In Freedman’s writings, he gives meaning to “civil engagement” based on his predictive motion that aging persons will soon involve themselves different from their previous thoughts of retirement. It is to this effect, Freedman insists that in as much civic engagement is concerned, the act of civic engagement would be better off, with retired persons being its paramount custodians (Moody & Sasser, 2020). From this aspect, earlier ideas on retirements become absolute as they are given new retirement roles in society; that is, civic engagement. Therefore, civic engagement is the inclusive development of ideas and guidelines to agree governed commandeered by a neutral and competent party.
The author’s vision would come to pass by the society focusing on the retired persons. This stands out to be a project in which any organization or society should get involved. This is because it turns out that the retired of age to have time after work. According to Moody and Sasser (2020), it is estimated that retired persons have an average of 16 free hours per day, implying that they have reliable availability. Their availability enables people to reach out and seek their advice, and they may act as patrons to develop societal structures.
The retired have more time to live, therefore making them an experienced lot. With their encounters, retired persons are civic-oriented apart from having practical experience of raising families and building social networks. Here they are a social capital in which the young can refer to their lost past (Moody & Sasser, 2020). However, engaging the retired in civic discourse would allow older adults to have a sensible meaning to them. For example, they would like to leave a legacy for future use. Therefore, the urges of the retired would create an increase in talent and vibrancy among the retired.
Reference
Moody, H. R., & Sasser, J. R. (2020). Aging: Concepts and controversies. (9th ed.). Sage Publications.