Source 1: Animal Rescue
The first source selected is the news article about animal rescue published by the New York Times. The title states that a Virginia facility rescued four thousand beagles, and they needed new homes (Jiménez and Rubin). The type of article is a news report written by two breaking news reporters, Jesus Jiménez and April Rubin. The issue discussed is that the dogs have around two months to find new homes after being discovered at a facility violating numerous federal standards. Over the last two years, repeated inspections of the Envigo breeding and research center in Cumberland, Virginia, have revealed many infractions of federal laws, leaving the beagles malnourished, unwell, wounded, and wounded and, in some cases, dead (Jiménez and Rubin). As a result, a federal court accepted a plan to rescue nearly four thousand beagles from the facility.
The structure of the presentation includes an explanation of the issue and reasons for the beagles’ rescue, followed by the time limit to find new homes for dogs and a chronology of facility inspections. The article creators highlight the issue of animal abuse and convey the urgency as the dogs need to be adopted as soon as possible. To achieve the goal, the creators use quotes, such as photos of the facility where dogs were living in unacceptable conditions. One of the remarks stated that it is vital to rescue the life and show dogs affection they have never felt before. I selected this article because I love animals, and it is truly terrific that some facilities do not follow regulations. I think the subject is crucial to addressing animal protection legislation’s importance. The material is presented clearly, incorporating facts, dates, and quotes. From my perspective, there is nothing to criticize, and the aspect to praise is that the news reporters shed light on the facility’s long history of mistreatment and endangering beagles.
Source 2: Climate Crisis
The second source is the news articles about the climate crisis published by the Guardian. The title acknowledges that the wealthy owner of Patagonia donates his firm to tackle the climate issue (McCormick). The author is Erin McCormick, a California database analyst, and reporter. The subject of the news article is the founder, Yvon Chouinard, who set a new model in corporate environmental leadership to combat the Earth’s climatic catastrophe. The structure of the presentation incorporates the brief background and reasons behind Chouinard’s decision, the clarifications on stock donations, and the company’s history of environmental activism (McCormick). The creator is trying to acknowledge the importance of donations to save the planet.
The tricks to achieve the goal include quotes about natural resources, restoration of the environment, and Chouinard’s statements about the climate crisis. For instance, the company’s mission statement is that Patagonia is in business to save the ecosystem. I selected this source primarily because of the article’s aim to encourage other businesses to contribute to preserving nature via donations. The subject is crucial because Patagonia’s new strategy is intended to create a precedent that discredits the classic shareholder capitalism thesis that business aims other than profit would mislead investors. Companies should embrace environmental ethics and donate more because most billionaires give away only a tiny portion of their net worth each year (McCormick). I praise the straightforward writing style of presenting facts and material preparation as it required the company’s investigation. The only criticism is that the reporter needed to include statistics on the climate crisis to emphasize the issue.
Source 3: Climate Change
The source featured is a BBC news report on climate change and the importance of reducing methane emissions. The title claims that reducing methane emissions will give people enough time to deal with climate change (McGrath). Matt McGrath, an environmental correspondent, prepared the article and presented findings based on the newly released IPCC report. The subject is that methane reduction will prevent long-term warming. Consequently, the structure of the presentation includes a solid thesis statement that experts advise to decrease methane emissions. The claim is followed by the IPCC report statistics, the difference explanation between CO2 and CH4, and completed by possible actions that different industries should consider (McGrath). The writer attempts to explain how small changes in several industries may quickly reduce methane generation.
The tricks to achieve the article’s objective are using credible statistics and demonstrating images to catch readers’ attention. I chose the article because I am interested in learning more about how to tackle climate change. For instance, around forty percent of methane originates from natural sources such as wetlands; nevertheless, the majority presently comes from various human activities (McGrath). The subject is informative as readers learn about various crisis-prevention activities, such as implementing technical modifications relating to waste and animal feed in agriculture.
From my perspective, the article is well-written, and there is nothing to criticize. The aspect to praise is using the IPCC report to acknowledge the issue’s importance, the experts’ quotes incorporation, and the wise image selection. The author also adds that the oil and gas sector confronts a significant problem in reducing methane emissions because current restrictions have failed to limit leaks (McGrath). Thus, treating methane differently through technology may give people more time to adjust to climate change.
Source 4: Wildlife in Danger
The final source is a news report published by Environment America, assuring that wildlife is in danger. The title acknowledges that a third of the country’s plants and animals are on the verge of extinction (Blackledge). The article’s author is a senior director at Environment America who oversees the organization’s work to conserve public lands, waters, and wildlife. The issue is that States have recognized over 12,000 species that require protection, such as the Florida panther and the monarch butterfly (Blackledge). Habitat degradation, pollutants, illness, and other factors threaten their survival. As a result, the United States Senate is debating the most significant piece of nature conservation policy since the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Blackledge). The article’s structure is divided into three crucial parts: introduction, wildlife in danger, and investing in the conservation of endangered species. The writer tries to demonstrate that endangered species must be saved and that people should vote to ensure that the Wildlife Act will pass.
The tricks employed by the writer are bold headings, the brief facts illustration, and the final question addressed to readers. The author asks the audience to take action by asking if they would assist conserve endangered species. I selected the source because I consider the issue of animal and plant extinction critical. From my perspective, the aspect to praise is that Blackledge achieved the goal because after reading the article, I realized that we need legislation to save wildlife. The bill’s funding would benefit initiatives such as habitat restoration and the reintroduction of native species. The only criticism is that the author could add more facts and data about threatened species.
Works Cited
Blackledge, Steve. “A Third of the Nation’s Plants and Animals are at Risk of Extinction.” Environment America, Web.
Jiménez, Jesus and April Rubin. “4,000 Beagles Are Being Rescued From a Virginia Facility. Now They Need New Homes.” The New York Times, Web.
McCormick, Erin. “Patagonia’s Billionaire Owner Gives Away Company to Fight Climate Crisis.” The Guardian, Web.
McGrath, Matt. “Climate Change: Curbing Methane Emissions will ‘Buy Us Time’.” BBC, Web.