Clinical Staff Training: Research Data Analysis Dissertation

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Research data for the research problem were developed as follows:

The coding of members of the surgical unit was 1 for the surgeon and 2 for other surgical team members, including surgical technologists and the circulating nurse.

Two training modalities were used: 1 (intensive classroom training) and 2 (hands on training). The willingness to use equipment, implement research, impact the hospital performance, and find new ways of using equipment were scale variables ranging from 0 to 100. Statistical analysis of qualitative data is made possible by assigning quantitative value to qualitative data using the Likert scale (Walker & Maddan, 2013). The frequency of technology use, patient satisfaction, and quality of service were measured using the Likert scale as follows:

  • The frequency of technology use was ranked 1 (never), 2 (rarely), 3 (occasionally), 4 (frequently), and 5 (very frequently).
  • The quality of services was ranked 1 (very poor), 2 (poor), 3 (average), 4 (good), and 5 (very good).
  • Similarly, patient satisfaction was ranked 1 (very dissatisfied, 2 (dissatisfied), 3 (neutral), 4 (satisfied), and 5 (very satisfied).

The following table shows the sample data that was collected:

MemberWorking experienceOverall working experienceTrainingEquipment useNew ways of utilizing equipmentResearch implementationTechnology usePatient satisfactionService qualityHospital performance
132414566454315
142426057564324
143414340653423
153613455652532
163012360763422
133414431674533
242526566455422
252927666654553
242826677345144
233228770475454
233115044643442
253013133434131
263314620323255
262827768344434
252713415503353
242826045345545
233213930444533
223612340371554

Based on the above data, the answers to the research questions are as follows:

What form of training is more effective in the training of staff members on the utilization of the equipment? Why?

Correlations

Pearson Correlation coefficient shows that there was a significant positive correlation between training modality and willingness to use equipment r = 0.87, BCa CI [0.652, 0.956], p ˂0.001. As the training modality shifted from 1 (intensive classroom training) to 2 (hands on training), the willingness to use equipment increased. This observation could be attributed to gaining confidence with equipment during training.

How does the intervention correlate with the frequency of the use of technology, patients’ satisfaction, as well as the quality of services provided?

Correlations

The Spearman’s correlation coefficient matrix shows that training modality does not have a significant correlation with patient satisfaction, rs= 0.-023, 95% BCa CI [-0.478, 0.405], p=0.928. The training modality is also not correlated with the quality of service rs= 0.102, 95% BCa CI [-0.327, 0.471], p=0.688. However, there is a significant correlation between training modality and the frequency of technology use, rs= 0.748, 95% BCa CI [0.096, 0.506], p˂0.001.

How does the intervention affect the participants’ willingness to implement their own research or find new ways of utilizing the equipment?

Correlations

The point-biserial correlation coefficient shows that the intervention has a significant correlation on new ways of using equipment, rpb= 0.670, 95% BCa CI [0.346, 0.889], p˂0.001. However, there was no significant correlation between the intervention and the willingness to implement own research, rpb= -0.305, 95% BCa CI [-0.691, 0.155], p˂0.001.

How does the intervention affect the participants’ willingness to affect the hospital’s performance as well as certain purchasing policies?

Correlations

The results showed that there was no significant correlation between the intervention and the subjects’ willingness to affect the hospital’s performance as well as certain purchasing policies, rpb= -0.30, 95% BCa CI [-0.102, 0.686], p=0.220.

References

The results showed that there was no significant correlation between the intervention and the subjects’ willingness to affect the hospital’s performance as well as certain purchasing policies, rpb= -0.30, 95% BCa CI [-0.102, 0.686], p= 0.220.

Walker, J. J., & Maddan, S. (2013). Understanding statistics for the social sciences, criminal justice, and criminology. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, April 10). Clinical Staff Training: Research Data Analysis. https://ivypanda.com/essays/clinical-staff-training-research-data-analysis/

Work Cited

"Clinical Staff Training: Research Data Analysis." IvyPanda, 10 Apr. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/clinical-staff-training-research-data-analysis/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Clinical Staff Training: Research Data Analysis'. 10 April.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Clinical Staff Training: Research Data Analysis." April 10, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/clinical-staff-training-research-data-analysis/.

1. IvyPanda. "Clinical Staff Training: Research Data Analysis." April 10, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/clinical-staff-training-research-data-analysis/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Clinical Staff Training: Research Data Analysis." April 10, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/clinical-staff-training-research-data-analysis/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1