Sugar is bad for the human body when it results in diverse medical complications among consumers. This product is obtained from different food items, including energy snacks, processed drinks, and barley products (Meldrum et al. 835). People engaging in uncontrollable consumption may suffer severe medical consequences, which include chronic illnesses. It is vital to acknowledge that all individuals are unique in biological functionalities. There are people whose body processes ensure effectiveness in breaking down the sugar. The product is broken down into valuable nutrients, providing the cells are energized to conduct other functions. Other individuals suffer from both low and high consumption of sugar (Hardin et al. 291). Their bodies react negatively to both low and high levels of consumption, as noted by healthcare experts. Most importantly, sugar is bad for the human body since its negative consequences include long-term medical complications.
Specifically, sugar is bad for the human body as it can cause blood sugar, as evidenced in different medical contexts. For instance, obese persons suffer from the condition due to uncontrolled eating behaviors (Hardin et al. 293). Normal biological functioning of their bodies encounters significant challenges due to high blood pressure. In essence, excess sugar in the human body manifests itself along the blood vessels in the form of fat. Specifically, the arteries take oxygenated blood to vital organs such as kidneys, liver, and lungs. Individuals suffering from high sugar content are advised to engage in physical activities for healthy living. Physiological activities increase the conversion of stored fat into energy when the body exercises. However, continued consumption of sugar might result in extreme death cases (Meldrum et al. 836). Organ failure arises when vital body parts lack sufficient nutrients and energy to facilitate beneficial human actions.
Moreover, sugar is bad for one’s health as it enhances the chances of excessive body weight. This discussion previously noted that the primary form of sugar is broken down into glucose as its basic form in biological processes. Excess glucose is stored in the liver in glycogen form aided by insulin. Individuals face the threat of excess body weight when sugar consumption amount exceeds the conversion rate (Meldrum et al. 838). The weight increases to severe levels, which threaten mobility as patients find to move body parts from one point to another. Patients suffering from excess body fats from sugary products also endure related illnesses such as diabetes, high blood pressure, or organ failure. Specific actions can help avoid extreme conversion impacts of unrestrained weight increase (Hardin et al. 294). Health experts consider the consumption of indigenous food products and physical exercises to prevent weight increases.
In conclusion, it is fundamental to regulate the consumption of sugar as it harms the body. Severe consequences of the product can include death due to organ failure, as evidenced by among obese patients. Individuals need to take caution when purchasing fast food products that contain high sugar content. Healthcare experts acknowledge that eating disorders can result in chronic illnesses when diagnosed. The body requires a certain level of glucose which enables cells to perform biological functions efficiently. The excess sugar is stored in the form of fat, which is facilitated by the liver. As a result, individuals can suffer from fatty liver disease, which threatens high blood pressure. In essence, this is also to mention that alcohol can be dangerous to individuals due to high sugar content. Uncontrolled consumption of alcohol may also depict similar medical outcomes as obese patients.
Works Cited
Hardin, Jessica, et al. “Body Size, Body Norms and Some Unintended Consequences of Obesity Intervention in the Pacific Islands.” Annals of Human Biology, vol. 45, no. 3, 2018, pp. 285-294.
Meldrum, David R., et al. “Obesity Pandemic: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions—But Do we have the Will?” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 107, no. 4, 2017, pp. 833-839.