Initially, the article highlights that a significant number of people today call themselves “spiritual but not religious,” a phrase that tends to spark controversy in society (Burkeman par. 1). One of the followers of this movement is Sam Harris, who refers to the fact that spirituality, along with the assistance of meditation, helps him become happy and feel that the world is a part of him (Burkeman par. 2).
The primary difference between spirituality and religion is the fact that spirituality does not have a set of principles and dogmas that one has to follow during his or her life (Burkeman par. 3). It gives an opportunity for atheists to be “present” and experience different forms of life without any fear. Thus, the author of the article claims that Harris’ ideas might be egocentric, as the majority of religious believers rely on practice and he was “baffled” by the question of whether God exists and was engaged in rituals to feel “present” (Burkeman par. 4).
As for me, I believe that spirituality does differ from religion. I completely agree with the fact that religion requires one to comply with set dogmas and principles. A particular figure of God is a role model that one has to follow. On the other hand, spirituality is a self-centered practice since it focuses on the inner world of individuals and gives them the right to become close to the “present.” In this case, Harris’ argument is logical, but I also believe that he should not criticize religion in public. Overall, spirituality is strongly related to religion and disrespecting religion questions one’s ability to admire the beliefs and values of other people. In this case, modern society should allow people to represent their own sense of religion and spirituality, as these concepts contribute to the development of tolerance and personal growth.
Work Cited
Burkeman, Oliver. “Spiritual but Not Religious? You Are Not Alone.” The Guardian. 2016.