Cooper’s Ethical Decision-Making Model: Corcoran State Prison Explicatory Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Introduction

The ethical decision-making model as advanced by Cooper (2009) offered a way through which sequences of questions can be formulated to provide guidance to the public administrators in a systematic evaluation of identical and challenging moral predicaments. The model has varied features that involve various levels of views concerning ethical apprehensions ranging from expressive to moral reflections.

In between the levels of perspectives are the moral rules and the ethical analysis. The Coopers decision-making model also includes sequences of steps that are iterative and back-looping (Cooper, 2012). The steps range from the description of the dilemma to finding the fit or ethical resolution.

Within the continuum of the series of steps are the definitions of the ethical issues involved, ascertaining the unconventional method as well as having a forecast of the conceivable consequences (Cooper, 2012). The varied features and consequences remain critical in the analysis of the Corcoran case.

Description of the Situation and Ethical Issues Involved in the Case

The case of Corcoran State Prison presents ethical situations that involve public administrators as well as the civil servants. The case revolves around the two prison guards Rigg and Caruso who were discontented with the manner in which the inmates were being treated.

Rigg and Caruso were particularly not happy with the way the inmate, Preston Tate, was treated and finally murdered by fellow prison guards and how the guards manipulated the reports in order to justify their actions (Dryburgh, 2009). According to Rigg and Caruso, the actions of the fellow prison guards were unwarranted and amounts to unethical behavior as well as contrary to the mission and values of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDOCR).

The core values of the department are based on integrity, justice and accountability, which were constantly being violated by the prison guards either by their conducts or their correctional strategies.

Description of the Possible Course of Action the Guards Could Have Taken

Exposing the unethical behaviors was not been the only action Caruso and Rigg could have taken. In fact, there were various options which included creating change within the organization through inventing new strategies of dealing with inmates’ violent behaviors (Cooper, 2012).

Besides, Rigg and Caruso could have opted to use ethical procedures by involving the authorities within the prison ranks not only within the Corcoran correction department but also from the major corrections departments within the state and at the federal levels. Moreover, Caruso and Rigg could have retrained the other prison guards on the moral issues and values of the organization as well as the consequences.

The Reasons Why They Chose to be Whistle Blowers

Rigg and Caruso decided to go public after all the alternative strategies failed. In fact, the attempts made by Caruso and Rigg to create change within the department failed before turning to the FBI for help (Dryburgh, 2009). Caruso and Rigg attempted to create awareness by citing deficiency in the laws that regulated the use of firearms and the conduct of the prison guards.

Rigg and Caruso argued that even though the prison guards were authorized to use the firearms, there were no clear rules on how the firearms should be used. Besides, Caruso and Rigg were loyal to the mission of the department that was aimed at guiding all employees’ leadership and behavior (Dryburgh, 2009).

Positive and Negative Consequences of Each Possible Course of Action

Each action by Rigg and Caruso had both positive and negative consequences. The action of whistle blowing or going public, which Caruso and Rigg resolved to take finally resulted into the two guards losing their jobs either by resigning or being fired from the organization.

Besides, whistle blowing resulted in the continuous suffering from the fear of retaliation even after leaving the public services and being offered the court protections. However, the action satisfied the individuals’ ego of being ethical and the need to uphold moral behaviors and conducts within the public service (Cooper, 2012).

On the part of the organization, the Corcoran prison department suffered the reputational damage particularly, in the public perspective. Besides, the department suffered a financial loss through the compensations made into one of the whistle blowers.

Even though the actions of creating change within the prison department did not result in the positive outcome, it was one of the best ways of creating and instilling ethical conducts within the organization. However, the organization did not recognize the importance of such ethical actions. As a result, Caruso and Rigg were perceived as going against the wishes of the organization and the fellow guards.

An Explanation of How the Ethical dilemma Was Resolved and Its Impacts

The ethical dilemma in this case is whether to disclose the immoral behavior in the part of prison officers or face the consequences of being fired from the civil services. The ethical issues presented in the case are one of the moral predicaments facing public servants (Cooper, 2012).

In the case, Caruso and Rigg used both internal and external channels to express their concern about the manner in which the inmates were being treated (Dryburgh, 2009). The environmental changes in both the workplace practices and legal system enabled the two guards to take action even though they were fully aware of the consequences.

However, the whole issue was settled in court and even though the prison department did not admit any wrongdoing, it suffered the consequence of financial loss through compensations made to the guards.

References

Cooper, T. L. (2012). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative roles. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons

Dryburgh, M. M. (2009). Personal and policy implications of whistle-blowing: The case of Corcoran State Prison. Public Integrity, 11(2), 155–170.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2019, June 22). Cooper's Ethical Decision-Making Model: Corcoran State Prison. https://ivypanda.com/essays/coopers-ethical-decision-making-model-2/

Work Cited

"Cooper's Ethical Decision-Making Model: Corcoran State Prison." IvyPanda, 22 June 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/coopers-ethical-decision-making-model-2/.

References

IvyPanda. (2019) 'Cooper's Ethical Decision-Making Model: Corcoran State Prison'. 22 June.

References

IvyPanda. 2019. "Cooper's Ethical Decision-Making Model: Corcoran State Prison." June 22, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/coopers-ethical-decision-making-model-2/.

1. IvyPanda. "Cooper's Ethical Decision-Making Model: Corcoran State Prison." June 22, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/coopers-ethical-decision-making-model-2/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Cooper's Ethical Decision-Making Model: Corcoran State Prison." June 22, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/coopers-ethical-decision-making-model-2/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1