The fair justice system is said to be one of the greatest achievements of the modern age. People believe that in the age of tolerance and democracy all people should be equal in the face of the law. That is why, representatives of various layers of society, social classes and cultures are said to be given a fair trial regardless of their state. However, the situation is not so simple as any various aspects could influence the trial and introduce some special conditions for the accused. Juveniles belong to the group which are given some special conditions and who might count on special attitude towards them. However, there are no reasons for this attitude.
Speaking about the given issue, it is important to give the clear definition of this category and determine who could be judged by the juvenile court. According to the existing laws, all young people, who have not reached the age of 18 years, should be judged under some special conditions by the juvenile court that will take into account their age (What is Juvenile Delinquency? 2011). It means that if a person is 17 years old he/she can still count on some indulgence. However, people aged 17 years are the independent individuals with a certain mentality and attitudes towards various issues. Under these conditions, the reasons for some special attitude towards them seem rather vague.
There is no use denying the fact that the number of crimes committed by juveniles increases every year. Moreover, there is the tendency towards the lowering of the age of young delinquents (Butts & Snyder, n.d). It becomes obvious that some serious measures to control this issue are needed. Resting on these facts, the process of the authorizing of young people with the same rights as adults have seems to be a good solution to the existing problem. Having realized the great responsibility and the possible punishment for a certain crime, young people could start to act more gingerly and think about the circumstances of their actions.
Besides, there is another disputable issue connected with the juvenile delinquency. The fact is that very often parents are called responsible for their childrens actions and are punished by a court. This practice could be taken as the fatally flawed. Parents care for their children and try to create the best conditions for them. Moreover, it is for them to educate children and explain the norms of behavior. However, if a child is not able to follow these norms and observe the law, parents should not be punished as it is not their fault. The environment has the great influence on a child (From Juvenile Delinquency to Young Adult Offending, n.d.) and if he/she obtains some ideas different from the values promoted by parents, it is the societys, not the familys fault.
With this in mind, it is possible to make a certain conclusion. The growth of the showings of the juvenile delinquency shows the necessity of the introduction of some measures to control this sphere. That is why, it is possible to say that juveniles should be guaranteed the same rights that adults have and given a free trial on the same conditions. This step could help young people to realize the great responsibility and be afraid of the aftermath of their violent actions. Moreover, parents should not suffer from the actions of their children and be punished instead of them as it could only make the situation worse.
References
Butts, J., & Snyder, H. (n.d.). Ph.D The Youngest Delinquents: Offenders Under Age 15. Web.
From Juvenile Delinquency to Young Adult Offending. (n.d.). Web.
What is Juvenile Delinquency? (2011). Web.