Home > Free Essays > Education > Education Theories > Creating a scoring rubric
Cite this

Creating a scoring rubric Essay


Analytical Scoring Rubric

  1. Unsatisfactory;
  2. Minimal competence;
  3. Competent;
  4. Exemplary.

Scoring rubric for social science essay assignment

Aspects Criteria (Descriptions of Scoring Levels) Score
Editorial Aspect 1: Clarity, organization, word usage, and understandability Student has shown no evidence of clarity, organization, word usage and ease of understanding. Articulation of response is poor
Response articulation is not detailed. There is limited evidence of clarity, organization, usage of words, and understandability
Response articulation is plausible. The candidate has shown competency in clarity, organization, word usage, and understandability of paper
Response articulation is competent. The candidate has shown high competency in clarity, organization, word usage, and understandability of paper
Editorial Aspect 2: Grammar punctuation and spelling The student’s work has numerous grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes that interfere with the flow and meaning of essay.
The student’s work contains major grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes that disrupt the flow and clarity of response
The student’s contains no grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes but has a few detectable minor mistakes
The student’s work has no grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes that are readily detectable therefore the response is meaningful and clear
Editorial Aspect 3: Paper quality Student’s paper is completely substandard with no quality
Incompetence in writing and research skills
The student provides sufficient logical explanation of the five required point of view.
The student displays paper of high quality with no errors. Student show impressive understanding of the topic
Editorial Aspect 4: Introduction and conclusion The student fails to provide a logical conclusion that summarizes the five required points of view
The student provides an insufficient summary of the main points. The conclusion is generally weak and does not explain much
The student provides sufficient summary of the main points. The conclusion is generally strong but too short with few details
The student provides sufficient and well articulated summary of the main points. The conclusion is strong and does not leave out any detail of the discussion
Content Aspect 1: Five different point of view: slavery, nationalism sectionalism, territorial crisis, and state rights The student fails to provide a description and comparison of any point of view as to why the US civil war occurred. There is no clear evidence of the relevance in the student’s discussions
The student clearly provides only two of the five required point views as to why the US Civil War occurred. There is limited evidence of relevance of discussion
The student only provides at least four of the five required point of view as to why the US Civil War occurred, and compares and contrast them properly to create a relevant discussion
The student provides all of the five required point of view as to why the US Civil War occurred, and compares and contrast them properly to create a relevant discussion.
Content Aspect 2: comparing critical aspects The student fails to provide a description and comparison of any point of view as to why the US civil war occurred. There is no clear evidence of the relevance in the student’s discussions
The student clearly provides only two of the five required point views as to why the US Civil War occurred. There is limited evidence of relevance of discussion
The student only provides at least four of the five required point of view as to why the US Civil War occurred, and compares and contrast them properly to create a relevant discussion
The student provides all of the five required point of view as to why the US Civil War occurred, and compares and contrast them properly to create a relevant discussion.
Content Aspect 3: Depth of research The student fails to provide a logical explanation of the five required point of view. The student only mentions a few of the points with no logic detail information about the issues
The student provides a logical explanation of the five required point of view but with minimal competency. The student only mentions a few of the points with no logical detail information about the issues
The student provides sufficient logical explanation of the five required point of view. The student mentions at least all of the points with no logic detail information about the issues
The student provides sufficient logical explanation of the five required point of view. The student mentions at least all of the points with logic detail information about the issues
Content Aspect 4: in-text citation and references The student fails to use 3 primary and 2 secondary sources or fails to include any in-text citation or references for the primary and secondary sources used
The student only provides at least two in-text citation for the required number of sources
The student uses five sources ( three primary and two secondary sources) and gives appropriate references and in-text citation but with formatting errors based on APA standards
The student uses five sources ( three primary and two secondary sources) and gives appropriate references and in-text citation but with no formatting errors based on APA standards

Level of performance

Unsatisfactory

The lowest level of performance is unsatisfactory. This level gets a score of 1. Generally, a candidate who gets this score did not understand the assignment in any way (Tierney and Marielle, 2004). There is an obvious lack of understanding of what is required. Both editorial and content aspects are poorly displayed (Tierney and Marielle, 2004). Clearly, the student did not take time to do the assignment well.

Minimal competence

This is the second lowest level of performance. Student’s work in this level has a few major mistakes and other minor mistakes (Tierney and Marielle, 2004). The student shows inadequate understanding of the assignment. The logic of argument also lacks clarity making it hard for the reader to understand (Tierney and Marielle, 2004). Basically the student failed to take time to do the assignment and therefore was forced to do it in a rush (Tierney and Marielle, 2004).

Competent

This level of performance is good and satisfactory. The student will show an understanding of all aspects needed to be measured. There are no major mistakes but there can be a few detectable minor mistakes (Mertler, 2001).

Exemplary

This is the highest level of performance. The student shows high competence of understand and responding to the assignment (Moskal, 2000). The work is free of major and minor errors. This level shows that student spent quality time to research and do the assignment (Moskal, 2000).

References

Mertler, C. 2001, ‘‘, Practical assessment, research and evaluation, vol. 7, no. 2. Web.

Moskal, B. 2000, ‘‘, Practical assessment research and evaluation, vol. 7, no. 3. Web.

Tierney, R. & Marielle, S. 2004, ‘‘, Practical assessment research and evaluation, vol. 9, no. 2. Web.

This essay on Creating a scoring rubric was written and submitted by your fellow student. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly.
Removal Request
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda.
Request the removal

Need a custom Essay sample written from scratch by
professional specifically for you?

Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar

certified writers online

GET WRITING HELP
Cite This paper

Select a citation style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2020, April 30). Creating a scoring rubric. Retrieved from https://ivypanda.com/essays/creating-a-scoring-rubric/

Work Cited

"Creating a scoring rubric." IvyPanda, 30 Apr. 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/creating-a-scoring-rubric/.

1. IvyPanda. "Creating a scoring rubric." April 30, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/creating-a-scoring-rubric/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Creating a scoring rubric." April 30, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/creating-a-scoring-rubric/.

References

IvyPanda. 2020. "Creating a scoring rubric." April 30, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/creating-a-scoring-rubric/.

References

IvyPanda. (2020) 'Creating a scoring rubric'. 30 April.

More related papers
Pss... Stuck with your
assignment? 😱
Support
Online
Pss... Stuck with your assignment? 😱
Do you need an essay to be done?
What type of assignment 📝 do you need?
How many pages (words) do you need? Let's see if we can help you!