Introduction
A school setting comprises several key components, including the physical environment, curriculum, faculty leadership, and culture. Educators should thus prioritize an inclusive and supportive environment that fosters collaboration among all elements, enabling them to work together harmoniously. Moreover, students of different ages, learning levels, and capabilities study, play, and coordinate in a myriad of other activities, just as they do in their actual homes. Thus, members of specific schools often become highly connected, making an individual’s issue a shared problem.
The resulting bonds are usually tighter in low-income learning institutes since members in economically deprived schools handle difficulties together virtually every day, making them more connected. Accordingly, critical moments occurring in these settings cause enormous consequences. Leaders must thus embody genuine governance traits for society to function in unity. The following account recounts the recent tragic incident at Good-Hope Elementary School. The work provides specific administrative strategies, based on Northouse’s philosophies of governance, that the school head can apply to save the situation.
Critical Incident
The busy and jovial school day was coming to a close, and everyone was ready to head home. Students and faculty members at Good-Hope Elementary School were excited to break for the summer holiday. Every plan was in place for the imminent break, with students busy wishing their peers a lovely time until their next meeting.
The institution was also in the process of planning a forthcoming tour. It was a trip designed for the year’s top performers in various areas, including both teachers and students. Mr. Brown, the new principal, had introduced this motivational endeavor to promote competitiveness. The administrator was renowned for enhancing overall performance in educational institutions.
The anticipation increased joy and unity in the school to exceptional levels. However, the school’s environment swiftly spun into one of grief and astonishment at around three o’clock in the evening when news about Mrs. Smith’s collapse in her classroom and the failed resuscitation process spread. She was the institution’s most beloved faculty member and acted as a mother to every learner.
Mrs. Smith was a fervent, loving, and devoted coach who had served at Good-Hope Elementary School for over 15 years. The teacher’s kind heart made her dear to everyone, including students, staff associates, and the community. Her demise meant an unfathomable loss to the school and every party involved.
A significant aspect leading to Mrs. Smith’s deep connection with students was her patience with them. The late worked together with learners experiencing learning issues until they grasped the concept. She was also highly committed to the students’ welfare, always giving her whole self to ensure that every learner and stakeholder felt satisfied. Therefore, everybody in the school deeply felt Mrs. Smith’s loss, leading to grief and cries among learners and colleagues.
The abrupt change of events demanded effective management of issues. Teachers needed a leader who could understand them, while learners required tolerance and relief. The ball thus rested on the head’s ability to manage effectively, amidst grieving the untimely death of a colleague and possibly pondering the likely grueling by the district’s board.
The school principal and staff struggled substantially to make sense of the happenings. They later learned from the involved medics that Mrs. Smith had experienced a heart attack. The information hit the community hard, leading to confusion and a sense of suddenness. The realization that their lost teacher had been suffering chest pains and other conditions related to heart issues for several weeks before her death made them wonder.
However, being a single mother with minimal resources made it hard for Mrs. Smith to afford health care insurance. The condition meant that the educator could not access the required medical treatment. Losing a teacher due to controllable circumstances was painful, especially for the principal, who always wished to give his teacher better pay.
Currently, the school cannot afford all the necessary introductory provisions, including textbooks and writing materials. Teachers had fought for pay increments for a long time, but could not obtain them, despite the head’s efforts to improve the situation. The school is a low-income Title 1 institution, and most of the learners there come from impoverished backgrounds, making it very difficult for them to pay their fees on time.
Mrs. Smith’s death was a wake-up call for the community and school district. Many learners in the facility already struggled academically and socially due to the poor economic state. The lot now had to deal with the departure of an adored educator. Mrs. Smith always went the extra mile to teach and offer guidance and emotional support to everybody.
The principal consulted her frequently on various matters related to the population and the best way to address emerging issues. She always gave informed and reliable advice that ensured the school’s progress. Smith was a parent to many and regularly used part of her earnings to settle the fees of brilliant students. She hardly cared whether the parents would refund her or not. She was such a selfless being that everybody wished to be near her, but unfortunately, she left the school at a critical moment. The thought of breaking the sad news to her family and how they, particularly her children, would react caused more pain to the staff.
The teacher’s death forced the Honolulu school district to realize the harsh truths regarding educational dissimilarity and the consequences it had on learners and staff members. The department began reassessing its priorities and implementing necessary changes to enhance the support provided to schools, staff, and learners. The conspicuous absence of mental health support and resources in the district pointed to the officers’ negligence.
The condition demanded rapid changes to promote fairness among the low-income facilities. The deep emotions experienced by students and staff at the moment and throughout the learning process required professional interventions that were often absent. The principal struggled significantly to manage his emotions and situations, continuously facing crying faces that had a meaningful impact on him.
The head was now establishing reliable funding for the school’s operations during the break, despite the absence of a vital helper. He was also supposed to initiate fundraising efforts for Mrs. Smith’s burial. Similarly, the school head had to find funds to offer scholarships to the numerous students sponsored by Mrs. Smith. The plan was to establish a financing program in Mrs. Smith’s name to maintain her presence in the school and community.
Leadership Models’ Implementation and Analysis
Mrs. Smith’s earlier injury at the school sparked discussions about the uneven distribution of capital and finances in low-income institutions. The state government and school district acknowledged the reality that existing policies and programs expose teachers and learners to significant challenges. Over 50% of America’s poor schools lack fundamental resources, crucial support staff, and mental health services (Kantamneni, 2020). The condition makes it challenging for institutions and their leaders to adequately address the complex needs of their stakeholders, particularly teachers and apprentices (Gaitens et al., 2021).
While Mrs. Smith’s injury was shocking, the occurrence led to several changes among the different players. The incident led to the enactment of new policies in the schools and districts. Her death thus stands to cause even more modifications in the sector.
The involved school district needs to renovate its tactics to prevent similar incidents (Ribeiro, 2019). Innovative plans are necessary for the region to resolve funding and other provision disputes in the area (Marianne, 2020). Nonetheless, concerns persist about the potential to implement such changes nationally and whether the developed corrective measures will be fully implemented.
The devastating event regarding Mrs. Smith’s death at school due to stress-related conditions required effective administrative intervention. The school’s principal and the district’s management have roles to play in this matter. Northouse’s ‘models of leadership’ prove highly applicable to both groups and can meaningfully help to manage the situation.
Trait Model
The trait model requires leaders to exhibit specific characteristics to lead effectively in various situations. The philosophy identifies personal qualities that make a manager effective and operational (Gammel & Furtner, 2021). Examples of such characteristics include charisma, confidence, and intelligence (Harrison et al., 2020).
Charismatic individuals are generally appealing and likable, enabling them to influence their followers with relative ease. Moreover, confident leaders remain self-assured and generally become a source of hope to their teams when things are going wrong. Lastly, intelligent individuals innovate effective working strategies using their brainpower to resolve issues or achieve anticipated results (Ytterstad & Olaisen, 2023). Thus, Good-Hope Elementary School’s principal and district heads can adopt the trait model to lead stakeholders to calmness and better management of events amidst the confusion and pain resulting from Mrs. Smith’s unexpected death.
Skills Model
Ensuring that students do not continue experiencing gaps in content delivery that remind them of the loss of their beloved teacher is vital. The matter requires the principal to utilize Northouse’s skills model in the present situation. The principle (skills model) helps administrators to utilize available resources to ensure normality (Northouse, 2022).
A vital aspect concerning the skills philosophy applicable in this case is task delegation (Northouse, 2021). The institution’s head should quickly determine the subjects taught by the departed colleague to save learners from loss. Mr. Brown must find the best replacements available, both within and outside the facility, to teach the deprived classes. He should then delegate roles to the fitting faculty members in a manner that ensures a smooth flow of school operations (Tilahun, 2020).
Utilizing this model reveals trust towards the remaining teachers and ensures stability among students. Being the school’s counselor, Mrs. Smith’s departure leaves students and teachers alike exposed to stress-related issues. The headteacher must thus allocate the responsibility to a qualifying staff member and offer the necessary support for the new role-player to fit the role.
Situational Leadership Model
Acknowledging changes in the situation and adopting the exemplary leadership approach to allow community members to mourn connotes Northouse’s situational leadership facet. According to Eddy and Kirby (2020), effective leaders are individuals who possess the ability to analyze their environment. The practice aids administrators in devising fitting approaches that help people realize normalcy.
Wu et al. (2021) reiterate that a democratic leader failing to make quick decisions during a crisis loses the opportunity to control issues. That is because disasters make it impossible for stakeholders to convene and reach a consensus. Therefore, the situational leadership model requires managers to adapt to changing conditions to remain effective and steer teams toward stability.
According to the principle, leadership is contingent upon circumstances and the feelings of supporters (Ahlquist, 2023). Adaptation involves adjusting administrative styles to meet the prevailing needs and requirements. Employing the situational method helps the principal manage the school community’s wishes while avoiding possible frictions that may arise due to the members’ stress-informed thoughtlessness during this emergency. Consequently, being more hands-on and directing the team in decision-making during the confusion amounts to acting according to the situation on the principal’s side.
Transformational Leadership Model
Good Hope Elementary School’s principal must also adopt the transformational leadership model suggested by Northouse to ensure progress in the school. The institution exists within a remote, low-income society and features many learners from troubled families. Over 60% of deprived students often lack access to meals and school fees (Cohen et al., 2021).
Muñiz (2021) reports that physical fights are common among impoverished communities as members attempt to establish their authority over others. Mrs. Smith was the primary benefactor in this situation, using her financial resources to ensure that bright students remained in school. Smith’s absence implies a massive gap in learners’ behavior and the institution’s general stability.
The condition necessitates the principal’s intervention in transforming the status quo. Strong (2019) praises Northouse’s models for their ability to change and inspire followers to achieve uncommon goals. The transformational philosophy maintains that leaders become effective by enabling and motivating their supporters to realize their full potential (UMass Global, 2023). Identifying a teacher with the ability to emulate Mrs. Smith and offering support towards the change will not only empower the specific staff but also help the entire school overcome the pain of living without their beloved mentor and friend.
Authentic Leadership Model
The authentic leadership model accentuates the prominence of transparency and self-awareness in management. It suggests that leaders who remain true to their beliefs and values are more likely to earn the trust of their followers. Mr. Brown must ensure that he remains authentic to continue influencing the subjects (Iszatt‐White & Kempster, 2019).
Notably, Mrs. Smith’s death means that the staff and students lack someone to trust and share personal issues with. This facet leads to mental distress that may threaten the team’s stability. The fact that Mrs. Smith succumbed to a heart attack may mean that several other faculty members are struggling silently (Agyapong et al., 2022)—the school’s poor condition forces staff to overwork, among other issues. Mr. Brown must ensure high levels of integrity and commitment to succeed. Coming from the community around the school provides the teacher with crucial knowledge about the area and its personnel. The principal must utilize this benefit to promote stability within the school community, enjoy peaceful leadership, and foster change.
Servant Leadership Model
Finally, the principal can employ the servant leadership style to ensure unity and support from faculty members during the grieving period. Demonstrating humility and attending to the needs of every member are examples of the aspects that make one a servant leader (White, 2022). Some teachers will have to teach more lessons before the school can find a replacement for the departed staff. All these imply shocks and increased pressure among the teaching fraternity. The head must manage changes effectively for things to flow smoothly. Appreciating the sacrifices and efforts made by teachers and adopting ways to cushion them from excessive pressure will enable the principal to become a servant leader (LEADx, 2022).
The principal shall organize support groups and provide means for grief counseling to show empathy. Offering suppleness in work responsibilities during the morning time to allow members to heal corresponds to the servant model (International Institute for Management Development, 2023). This principle recommends that leaders prioritize serving their followers’ needs over focusing on their own welfare. Using the strategy will allow Mr. Brown to act selflessly and sustain a united team capable of weathering the tides.
Conclusion
The occurrences at Good-Hope Elementary School depict the typical happenings in many low-income learning institutions in the U.S. The issue further underscores the profound challenges of leadership in such settings. Mr. Brown is the principal of the school where a teacher, Mrs. Smith, dies from a heart attack during school hours before a scheduled closing meeting. The matter causes profound havoc as faculty members and learners come to terms with the sad news. The principal must control issues and use the occurrence to initiate a lifelong revolutionary initiative.
Northouse’s leadership models are particularly relevant in the current state, offering the principal and the school district reliable strategies to manage the crisis. Northouse differs from many other management scholars who promote specific leadership principles. The researcher describes several administrative approaches and situations where they are best suited (Crane, 2022).
Thus, the scholar’s approach significantly unravels the contradiction caused by opposing findings on management strategies. Appreciating Northouse’s message will help Mr. Brown devise appropriate ways to manage the condition at his school. The servant, situational, and transformational leadership principles can significantly help administrators.
Summaries
Organizations require different management approaches at different times, based on the prevailing conditions. However, many administrators prefer specific styles, which are used regardless of the circumstances (Ribeiro, 2019). This aspect contradicts the situational model advanced by Northouse (2022). Situational heads know when to apply democratic leadership facets and when to make decisions independently.
Notably, Marianne (2020) argues that crises destabilize democratic leaders by undermining the legitimacy of consent. Good-Hope Elementary School is in this situation, and its effective handling of issues relies primarily on the manager and his leadership capability. The leader must be several things at once. Mr. Brown must decide independently on the course the school should take, given the urgency of the situation.
The principal should further introduce favorable temporary school policies and loosen some of the existing ones (Burke, 2021). Mr. Brown needs to become a servant, transformational, empathetic, and authentic groundbreaker. The leader is required to establish balance and act appropriately in different situations to resolve the matter. Every party at the institute currently requires support, and Mr. Brown is responsible for providing it as the institute’s head.
Recommendations and Solutions
Lastly, life’s circumstances often require humans to grow and try new things. Mr. Brown’s struggles with addressing concerns regarding the institution’s critical event reveal his lack of principled governance abilities, which are essential for an innovative principal (Crane, 2022). Correspondingly, the point that Mrs. Smith served while unwell without the school head noticing implies incompetence in human resources management (Burke, 2021).
Examining Mr. Brown and Mrs. Smith’s characters reveals apparent supervisory differences. Mrs. Smith was no stranger to the challenges faced by learners, as she regularly separated and counseled fighting pupils. Her selflessness and humanity even saw her sometimes experience severe injuries while protecting apprentices from a psychotic learner.
Mr. Brown is skilled at delegating responsibilities and ensuring that people deliver. According to Northouse (2022), administrators require training in situational, servant, and transformational leadership models to become effective. Marianne (2020) suggests that school heads should proactively initiate positive changes in the status quo. However, Mr. Brown waits until critical incidents happen in his school for the district to react. It is paramount that Mr. Brown enrolls in management courses to become a well-rounded leader.
References
Agyapong, B., Obuobi-Donkor, G., Burback, L., & Wei, Y. (2022). Stress, burnout, anxiety and depression among teachers: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10706.
Ahlquist, J. (2023). Digital Leadership in higher education: Purposeful social media in a connected world. Taylor & Francis.
Burke, L. (2021). Navigating grief and memorials. Inside Higher Ed.
Cohen, J. F., Hecht, A. A., McLoughlin, G. M., Turner, L., & Schwartz, M. B. (2021). Universal school meals and associations with student participation, attendance, academic performance, diet quality, food security, and body mass index: A systematic review. Nutrients, 13(3), 911.
Crane, R.B. (2022). Adaptive leadership practices: High school leadership in Maine during the COVID-19 crisis. [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Maine]. Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
Eddy, P. L., & Kirby, E. (2020). Leading for tomorrow: A primer for succeeding in higher education leadership. Rutgers University Press.
Gaitens, J., Condon, M., Fernandes, E., & McDiarmid, M. (2021). COVID-19 and essential workers: A narrative review of health outcomes and moral injury. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1446.
Gammel, J. H. & Furtner, M. R. (2021). Process perspectives on leader traits, behaviors, and leadership situations. The Handbook of Personality Dynamics and Processes, 1(2), 1119-1138.
Harrison, C., Omeihe, I., Simba, A., & Omeihe, K. (2020). Leading the way: The entrepreneur or the leader? Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 1-17.
International Institute for Management Development. (2023). Servant leadership. IMD.
Iszatt‐White, M. & Kempster, S. (2019). Authentic leadership: Getting back to the roots of the ‘root construct’? International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(3), 356-369.
Kantamneni, N. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on marginalized populations in the United States: A research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119(1), 1034-39.
LEADx. (2022). Servant leadership: Definition, examples, and characteristics.
Marianne, M. (2020). Leadership in times of crisis: A systematic literature review [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Balamand]. UOB Theses and Projects.
Muñiz, J. O. (2021). Exclusionary discipline policies, school-police partnerships, surveillance technologies and disproportionality: A review of the school to prison pipeline literature. The Urban Review, 53(5), 735-760.
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Introduction to leadership: Concepts and practice. SAGE.
Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice. SAGE.
Ribeiro, S. (2019). Leadership at the primary school level in post-conflict Timor-Leste: A study of the historical background, recent developments and current concerns of school leaders [Doctoral Thesis, The University of Western Australia].
Strong, J. (2019). Strong leadership: Effective principles, proven strategies. Lulu Press, Incorporated.
Tilahun, G. (2020). Practice and role of transformational leadership on organizational performance. GRIN.
UMass Global. (2023). What is transformational leadership? Understanding the impact of inspirational guidance. UMass Global Main Campus.
White, K.S. (2022). What is servant leadership? A philosophy for people-first leadership. SHRM Executive Network.
Wu, Y. L., Shao, B., Newman, A., & Schwarz, G. (2021). Crisis leadership: A review and future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), 101518.
Ytterstad, S. & Olaisen, J. (2023). An overview of perspectives of transformational leadership. Learning Transformational Leadership: A Pedagogical and Practical Perspective, 3(2), 13-33.