Introduction
Family caregivers aid in the processes of daily life and offer support relating to an inherent physical or mental handicap for at-home care provision. Caregivers are accountable not only for satisfying the physical requirements of patients and individuals in residential care, but also for promoting total happiness and emotional well-being. In the selected research article, the issue of supporting nursing care for family caregivers is discussed by applying a retrospective nursing file study.
Source
The specific scholarly nursing research article that was selected as a source is named “Supportive nursing care for family caregivers – A retrospective nursing file study.” In fact, the study can be considered as relevant since it was originally issued in 2021. Therefore, the source is within the time frame of five years and is acceptable according to the principles of current academic examination and scientific novelty. The work was published in a peer-reviewed journal which is called “Applied Nursing Research”. Concerning the bibliography and the list of references that are provided in the article, it is feasible to state that all scholarly sources are represented by the authors using the most current APA formatting rules. The permalink to the indicated article via Chamberlain University library is presented (Web).
Credibility of the Source
A credible and reliable source is one that is free of prejudice, supported by facts, and authored by a reputable writer or institution. In general, there are many sources in the scientific sector, and determining the legitimacy of such sources is a crucial information literacy competence. Considering the review of the characteristics of credible sources, it is possible to refer to the indication of several essential aspects that include accuracy, currency, relevance, purpose, and authority.
Regarding the description of two characteristics that verify the credibility of the selected source, it is reasonable to specifically emphasize currency and authority. The chosen article can be highlighted as current since it was published in the academic journal in 2021. In addition, the authors utilize exclusively relevant and new works as references since the majority of the bibliography list contain studies that were issued within the previous five years. Furthermore, the scholars describe and discuss a current issue in the field of nursing in the article, which is related to supportive nursing care for family caregivers. The research corresponds to the aspects of authority since it was published in a peer-reviewed journal and initially conducted by the scientists and professors at Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences in the Netherlands.
In terms of the explanation of why each of the two characteristics is evidence of credibility, it is obligatory to determine their value. The period material was published or generated indicates how recent and current it is or how timely it is in relation to the topic being researched. The date of copyright and the period of publishing are important markers of the content’s currency. If the study area is time-sensitive, the paper’s currency will play a role in determining whether or not it is appropriate for the examination. Embracing new ideas since an authoritative figure claims they are accurate is known as the authority technique. The level of confidence that researchers have in a source is referred to as authority and validity. Moreover, competent researchers recognize that non-traditional sources can provide useful data.
Synopsis of the Study
Family and community caregivers allow individuals to be cared for and live at home, whilst nurses tend to assist these persons’ family carers. The purpose of the chosen work is to acquire additional knowledge regarding nurses’ comments on supportive therapy for family carers. Twelve residential care organizations in the Netherlands were selected to be engaged in the retrospective nursing record study in terms of research design (van Driel et al., 2021). Ten organizations planned to participate in the research, but only four were able to do it practically (van Driel et al., 2021). The home care organizations chose all medical files associated with a set of time-based inclusion criteria. Considering the discussion of a sample, a record number of 59 nursing documents were examined, with the number of data files per organization ranging from 8 to 23 (van Driel et al., 2021). In terms of the data collection methods, the authors created a method to retrieve information from the records, such as clinical features, diagnosis, death location, family caregiver aspects, and supportive nursing practice actions.
The scholars gathered data retrospectively till the period of statistical analysis if individuals who satisfied the established evaluation and exclusion criteria were still alive at the time. Confidentiality conditions were satisfied since the research was conducted in total compliance with Dutch privacy laws. According to the summary of findings, 54 of the 59 medical records revealed information regarding the patient’s family carers and how they interacted with him (van Driel et al., 2021). Nurses reported a variety of issues and nursing conditions on family carers, which were seldom found by the existing requirements assessment instruments for family caregivers. Moreover, nurses failed to report on intended supportive therapy to receive feedback on recognized issues or diagnoses, as well as the review of family caregivers’ perspectives.
Critique and Recommendations
Emphasizing the strengths of the selected scholarly article, it can be stated that the research’s benefit is that three authors collected and analyzed the information, and the results were thoroughly debated within the research group. Furthermore, the findings are consistent with an earlier study on nurse documentation and recording in patient charts (van Driel et al., 2021). Concerning the limitations of the academic work, it is feasible to note that examining the recording of nursing reports is insufficient to comprehend supportive nursing services for family carers of patients towards their death. As a result, the outcomes must be regarded with caution in this circumstance. The capacity to present a complete picture of nursing practice for family caregivers in this environment is limited due to non-recorded information. Additionally, in my opinion, the original research’s selection of exclusively four home healthcare organizations is a drawback. In terms of recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate, to my mind, it is possible to highlight the importance of studying the relationship between caregivers and patients. More precise and comprehensive nursing documentation is required to consistently assist family caregivers of individuals.
Conclusion
To summarize, “Supportive nursing care for family caregivers – A retrospective nursing file study” is the title of the scientific nursing research publication that was chosen as a source. The goal of the research study is to gather knowledge about nurses’ perspectives on supportive treatment for family carers. To emphasize the research’s strengths, it may be claimed that the research’s benefit is that three authors gathered and evaluated the data, and the findings were fully argued within the research group. In terms of the academic work’s limitations, it is worth noting that evaluating the recording of nursing reports is insufficient for understanding supportive nursing services for family carers of patients nearing death.
Reference
van Driel, A. G., Becqué, Y., Rietjens, J., van der Heide, A., & Witkamp, F. E. (2021). Supportive nursing care for family caregivers – A retrospective nursing file study. Applied Nursing Research, 59, 151434–151434. Web.