Schools are the institutions which are aimed to teach children to enter the future adult life with the amount of knowledge. Teachers are the guarantees of students’ knowledge and there are a lot of rules which are imposed on students, but there are also rules, which follow teachers’ school life. There are two main questions which should be considered, (1) whether it is possible to breach the contract and (2) when the new rules may be inserted in the school life on the local and state level.
Considering the question about the job contract it is impossible to skip the information that all working relations are noted there and that the point about contract breach has to be present there. All points should be discussed there, including the possibility of consistent breach of the contract and by one side. Labour legislation contemplates the time limits, which the worker should work off after the announcement of his/her leaving, and this time limit is two weeks. The meaning is that when the person leaves the employer should have enough time to find another person on the vacant place.
The other aspect of this question is the moral responsibility about the children and the personal ability to leave them in the middle of the school year without completing the program which was planned. The personal conscience is involved in this part of the question and everything depends on the inner qualities of the responsible person. Leaving the teaching practice for a better job no one has the right to condemn you, at the same time as the teacher, who was asked to leave the school because of professional unfitness (in the middle of the year), should not have any contradictions if the reasons for dismiss are argumentative.
The question about the time limits of discipline implementation at school should fall to the beginning of the school year, as it is difficult to reorganize the educational process to the new rules in the middle of the year when people have already planned the work and constructed some plans for future. Moreover, the question about the future changes should be discussed, then the announcement should be made that the state government plans to provide such penalties for these misconducts, as the opinion of the schools should be heard, and only then, after the question is discussed and agreed, the change may be announced as accepted. The acceptation of the misconduct penalties should be announced in the middle of the previous year with the amendment that it comes into effect from the next school year.
All the changes in the school live, taking into account the penalties for misconduct should be accepted on the district or even state level, and only then handled to the local schools. The examples of the penalties for misconduct may be as follows, every person should come through licensure after some period of time (the absence of the licensure is the penalty on the state level), the avoidance of the rules of the school, such as classes missing without reasonable cause (the penalty on the district level) or constant lateness for classes or latency of the document surrender (the punishment of the local level).
The offered examples should be punished as school is the place where children are taught and they should be given the examples of behavior. The absence of control among teachers will make impossible the whole educational progress, so penalties should be provided on all, state, district and local level.