Updated:

Distributive and Integrative Negotiation Approaches Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

The set pie, or the limited available resources, is emphasized in the negotiating strategy known as distributive bargaining. It also pushes the parties to work for each participant’s most significant feasible result (Tuncel et al., 2020). In order to get the most remarkable result, this kind of competitive strategy aims to maximize one’s advantages while limiting those of the opposing side. The distributive bargaining paradigm may be used in various talks, including discussions about commercial deals and wage negotiations.

I have taken part in many discussions that fall under the category of distributive bargaining, such as salary negotiations. The most recent wage negotiation resulted in a salary of $12,000 yearly, more than I was first offered $10,000. I also employed the distributive negotiation technique to obtain the lowest price while purchasing a laptop. The laptop’s initial listed price was $400, but the vendor and I were able to negotiate on a different price, and the seller bargained based on laptop features. We tried to get the best deal possible, ultimately reaching $360, $40 less than the asking price. My desire to gain an advantage in this circumstance characterizes the distributive bargaining strategy. Because I was able to negotiate a higher wage effectively, I am confident in my ability to bargain utilizing this strategy.

An integrative bargaining approach is a form of negotiation in which all the parties focus on expanding the pie by increasing the resources available to accomplish their objectives. This cooperative technique aims to get the maximum advantage for all parties involved (Lo et al., 2018). The integrative negotiating approach may be used for various agreements, including joint ventures, supply chain issues, and group problem-solving discussions.

I have taken part in many negotiations that use the integrative bargaining technique. Agreements relating to the supply chain are only one example of these debates. I successfully obtained a better deal for the company and supplier in the most recent round of supply chain talks for stationery supply. I took part in price determination. I devised a fixed price and economical price modification, which benefitted both. I also utilized integrative bargaining to reach a win-win agreement in a group problem-solving negotiation. Some people handled money poorly and wanted the group to be disbanded, while the rest demanded financial transparency. After considering all points of view, it was determined that financial openness is required to create a win-win scenario since dissolution would not solve the issue. The suggestion was approved, and the group continued to work on its activities. I am confident in my ability to negotiate using this tactic since I reached an agreement that benefited both parties.

The integrative negotiating approach is easier to implement as it promotes cooperation and the growth of current resources rather than their removal. I feel more confident negotiating using this method since it allows for more creative ideas and flexibility (Park et al., 2019). Consequently, I feel more at ease using it but have concerns about both methods (Benetti et al., 2021). When parties participate in distributive bargaining, the situation could turn into a zero-sum game where one party gains at the expense of another. Integrative negotiations risk forcing too many substantial compromises, which might lead to a compromise that is unfair to both parties.

In conclusion, distributive and integrative bargaining are successful negotiating tactics with distinct benefits and drawbacks. Since it stresses the limited resources available and encourages the best outcome for each person, distributive bargaining is more competitive. Integrative bargaining is more cooperative than distributive since it concentrates on increasing the resources available to the parties, enabling a win-win result. I have used both approaches in various discussions and have successfully gotten the best possible outcome for myself and all parties. I am aware of the drawbacks of both strategies, such as the potential for a zero-sum game in distributive negotiating and the danger of making too many concessions in integrative negotiation.

References

Benetti, S., Ogliastri, E., & Caputo, A. (2021). . Journal of Management & Organization, 27(4), 786-808. Web.

Lo, H. W., Liou, J. J., Wang, H. S., & Tsai, Y. S. (2018). . Journal of cleaner production, 190, 339–352. Web.

Park, J., Rahman, H. A., Suh, J., & Hussin, H. (2019). . Sustainability, 11(23), 6832. Web.

Tuncel, E., Kong, D. T., Parks, J. M., & van Kleef, G. A. (2020). . Organizational behaviour and human decision processes, 161, 255-273. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2024, May 26). Distributive and Integrative Negotiation Approaches. https://ivypanda.com/essays/distributive-and-integrative-negotiation-approaches/

Work Cited

"Distributive and Integrative Negotiation Approaches." IvyPanda, 26 May 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/distributive-and-integrative-negotiation-approaches/.

References

IvyPanda. (2024) 'Distributive and Integrative Negotiation Approaches'. 26 May.

References

IvyPanda. 2024. "Distributive and Integrative Negotiation Approaches." May 26, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/distributive-and-integrative-negotiation-approaches/.

1. IvyPanda. "Distributive and Integrative Negotiation Approaches." May 26, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/distributive-and-integrative-negotiation-approaches/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Distributive and Integrative Negotiation Approaches." May 26, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/distributive-and-integrative-negotiation-approaches/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1