Dignam, Colette, et al. “Moving from “Do Not Resuscitate” Orders to Standardized Resuscitation Plans and Shared-Decision Making in Hospital Inpatients.” Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, vol. 7, 2021, pp. 1-10.
This article dwells on how DNR orders could affect the process of care provision on a long-term scale. The authors claimed that the quality and frequency of CPR orders vary drastically, which may lead to reduced quality of care (Dignam et al. 4). The article is published in a renowned journal by a team of experts in the field of care provision, so the source can be deemed credible. This research article is relevant because it hints at the idea that DNR activities often overlook patient preferences and cannot be standardized while remaining medically appropriate.
Fan, Sheng-Yu, and Jyh-Gang Hsieh. “The Experience of Do-not-Resuscitate Orders and End-of-Life Care Discussions among Physicians.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 18, 2020, pp. 6869-6879.
This article is important because it discusses DNR decisions and their impact on patients and their families. The majority of negative outcomes transpire when care providers ignore insights provided by the patient and their family members (Fan and Hsieh 6872). This source is credible because it explores DNR experiences through the prism of a thematic analysis of available evidence. The article is relevant to the current research project because it includes the key barriers to decision-making that may have an influence on patient outcomes on a long-term scale.
Goodarzi, Afshin, et al. “Knowledge, Attitude and Decision-Making of Nurses in the Resuscitation Team towards Terminating Resuscitation and Do-not-Resuscitate Order.” Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, vol. 32, no. 2, 2022, pp. 413-422.
This article explores the concept of CPR in relation to the need to make decisions related to the termination of resuscitation. Goodarzi et al. explore the possibilities of avoiding legal and ethical confusion when improving the decision-making process associated with DNR (418). It can be safe to say that the source is credible because renowned researchers utilized a reliable methodology to collect and analyze the data (e.g., Spearman’s correlation analysis, Fisher’s exact, and Mann-Whitney’s U tests). The article is relevant since it addresses the ethics of DNR decisions and bares the concerns surrounding the potential ways of improving DNR-related processes.
Works Cited
Dignam, Colette, et al. “Moving from “Do not Resuscitate” Orders to Standardized Resuscitation Plans and Shared-Decision Making in Hospital Inpatients.” Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, vol. 7, 2021, pp. 1-10.
Fan, Sheng-Yu, and Jyh-Gang Hsieh. “The Experience of Do-not-Resuscitate Orders and End-of-Life Care Discussions among Physicians.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 18, 2020, pp. 6869-6879.
Goodarzi, Afshin, et al. “Knowledge, Attitude and Decision-making of Nurses in the Resuscitation Team towards Terminating Resuscitation and Do-not-Resuscitate Order.” Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, vol. 32, no. 2, 2022, pp. 413-422.