Introduction
Clinical evaluation refers to a set of continuous activities that use scientifically proven techniques for conducting assessment and investigation of medical information. An evaluation plan is a guideline for performing the analysis process. Counseling entails a conversation between a therapist and the client and involves solving emotional matters. It allows the patient to fully acknowledge and understand the cause of their mental issues. The clinical trials and the program appraisal generate information and skills needed for counseling purposes. Clinical practices produce results that are used to offer counseling and guideline.
Screening
The sequence is formulated through financing from centers for disease control and organization for preventive teaching and research purposes. They are actions that include the identification of unknown illnesses through tests, medical examinations, and clinical procedures for drug addicts. Screening and identification form the basis for understanding the level at which the addict has been affected. Thus, the procedure is a factor in reducing the morbidity rates that are connected to certain illnesses. It entails understanding the patient’s cognitive behavior, physical examination and analysis, and conducting accurate laboratory tests. The presence of drugs after the test stimulates early diagnostic actions to reduce the progression of the effects.
There must be good criteria to facilitate good screening activity. For instance, it has to be cheap, ensure human safety, be readily accessible, and have an excellent medical treatment plan. It has to be accepted by the users to ensure it affects their health positively. It has to be scientifically proven with good reasonable research evidence and the ability to correctly predict the use of harmful substances. For instance, it should give a clear outline and the actual test obtained from the drug user. The experts should conduct regular screening to enhance the chance to know the stage it has reached and act accordingly.
There are various defined concepts for evaluating screen tests, which include validity and reliability. Validity shows the correctness and significance of how the conducted tests match the patient’s clear clinical signs. Reliability shows an experiment’s clinical ability to produce similar results even after doing the procedures more than once. Various types of reliability are used; for instance, sensitivity evaluates the drug users who have been addicted to substance abuse. Specificity provides an evaluation of those who lack the symptoms (Kirss, 2017). The use of multiple screening experiments has improved the effectiveness and accuracy of the predictive values.
During the clinical evaluation, several factors have to be considered; the researcher should include the correct group of individuals who use the drug and the adequate performance of a control experiment. The sample used to conduct the analysis should be good enough to obtain accurate results, thus, the larger the sample, the more accurate the findings. The methods used should have the capability of producing the required results. Therefore, researchers should perform the re-screening activities to obtain consistency (Daldere et al., 2018). The screen test conducted should improve the present state of chemical products and technologies used.
Ethical considerations and acts should have to be examined to avoid violation of the regulatory procedure and rules. It ensures that there is respect for all persons regardless of their race and religion. The users have to be educated on the danger of consuming bhang and future effects that can completely ruin their lives. The counseling sessions should be conducted regularly to allow the victim to understand important points.
The human rights and personal privacy issues of the concerned individual should be observed throughout the procedure, and the therapist should always abide by the patient’s consent. They are working with the family members and relatives towards concluding individual health matters. A screening program is set and implemented to ensure that a series of medical events are followed before diagnostic results are given out. Therefore, screening for drug and substance users is essential as it allows both the patient and therapist to know the level of the drug content and the necessary measure to be undertaken during treatment.
Examination and Analysis
Assessment involves a sequence of activities to gather information and come to satisfactory conclusions using psychosomatic and neurological experiments. It is aimed at determining the drug addicts’ problems and the available clinical symptoms. The clients’ readiness and willingness to undertake a treatment process is vital and should be regarded as the primary key factor. The collected data provides the caregiver with the necessary information regarding the patient. The above information may also assist in revealing the characteristics of the person, their emotional status, mental functioning, and contextual challenges (Wilborn et al., 2018).
Thus, this helps determine ways to deal with users in terms of being counseled, and if necessary, a treatment plan is formulated. However, proper concepts and techniques of treatment should be applied to assess if the procedures used are recommendable and consistent. Clinical services provided should follow a systematic process that ensures that only the needed services are applied. The validity involves comparing two different techniques and determining which method best serves the common purpose—predictive validity forecast about the upcoming events or what will happen in the future.
Standardization has to be used to ensure that patients’ experiences and different clinical services are the same, regardless of the process. Various methods of assessment are used; for instance, observation can be laboratory or naturalist. Laboratory actions entail keen looking into the specimen like a blood smear to obtain data that is used for assessment and evaluation (Harvey et al., 2019). Clinical interviews are done where there is a confrontation with the client and obtaining required data. This process facilitates the collection of the required information to help in different assessment stages.
Psychological tests help in understanding the individuals’ mental and biological functioning. Performing neurological test help the professional understand the analytical disorders caused by brain actions. Behavioral assessment helps in determining the target characters and understanding the severity of the condition. The serious and life-threatening case should be handled by a higher level of care. This is done under authorization from the expert dealing with the client.
The assessment finding should be well documented for further analysis. Close supervision and monitoring of clinical activities have to be put in place to facilitate the keen collection of required data. Each examination level should provide detailed information about what has been examined. The analyst’s level of knowledge and competence should be a reflection of what has been obtained from the user. Training is required where necessary to boost the individuals’ expertise level.
An effective procedure has to be formulated to ensure that the drug addicts can restore their health and reduce the effects. Suitable treatment recommendations and prescriptions are to be made to ensure patients’ well-being (Maugeri & Musumeci, 2021). For instance, drug users should be placed in rehabilitation centers to get enough counseling and the necessary medical attention. The legalized procedure should be applied where necessary, and consequences implied for violation of practice. The written information has to be kept in privacy, and only the authorized personnel should have the right to access it. In cases where the clinical issues are complicated, specialized medical services ensure effective service delivery.
References
Daldere, D., Zacharias, N., & Hinz, O. (2018). Which collaborative activities should firms perform to become gatekeepers in collaboration networks? Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), 14392. Web.
Harvey, H., Keen, J., Robinson, C., Roff, J., & Gross, T. (2019). Quantitative analysis of approaches to group marking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1133-1147. Web.
Kirss, T. (2017). Those who decide about the fate of the foreigner. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, 26(1), 128-133. Web.
Maugeri, G., & Musumeci, G. (2021). Adapted physical activity to ensure the physical and psychological well-being of COVID-19 patients. Journal 0f Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 6(1), 13. Web.
Wilborna, D., Kramer, M., Stevenson, B., & Dvorak, R. (2018). Should I stay, or should I go? Approach/avoidance conflict and emotional functioning. Personality and Mental Health, 12(4), 298-308. Web.