Introduction
Since its opening in 1879, the Ealing Common Underground Station, located in the center of London’s bustling Ealing area and now housed in a Grade II-listed building, has remained in continuous service. The structure is historically noteworthy since it was one of the earliest underground railway stations. Moreover, it is a prime example of the Victorian style of architecture that was prevalent during the period.
This project aims to increase participants’ awareness of and appreciation for the aesthetic, social, and cultural aspects and the artistry, material, and design qualities of the Ealing Common Tube Station. In addition, it is intended to conduct a general examination and a physical survey of the building to evaluate the structure’s current state and identify any signs of deterioration and defects. Below is a map showing the actual location of Ealing Common Tube Station and the neighboring towns.
Listed Status, History, Context
The Ealing Common Underground Station is a Grade II-listed building that serves as a monument to the city’s early development of the transportation system. It can be found in the center of the Ealing area in West London. Charles Clark, the architect for the Metropolitan District Railway (MDR), was responsible for the station’s design, which was constructed in 1879 (Douglas, 2011).
The MDR was one of the first businesses in London to operate an underground railway, and it was eventually absorbed into the London Underground network (Forsyth, 2013). The station’s architecture is influenced by the late Victorian style, which was prevalent when it was built (Douglas, 2011). This style is recognized by its rich red brickwork and intricate stone detailing. The Ealing Common Tube Station has two ticket halls with platforms on either side of the tracks, a novel design element for its time.
In 1879, when the station was first constructed, it looked different from when it was rebuilt in 1930. The station’s building in 1879 and the following years until 1930 was more compact and lacked the elements that appeared in the new version, such as the arched windows and ornamental cornices. The general style was similar; however, the original building corresponded more with the Victorian style due to such elements as a steeply pitched roof and asymmetry (Figure 2).
In 1886-1910, the station carried the name of West Acton. In 1903, the railway to Park Royal & Twyford was built. It was then that electric trains started running between Ealing Common and Acton Town, both on the new and the existing rails. In 1905, electric train exploitation began between Ealing Common and Ealing Broadway (Historic England, n.d).
The original station building, built in 1879, was dismantled and replaced between 1930 and 1931. The newly built facility was constructed of Portland stone; a heptagonal hall glazed on all sides was added, with Charles Holden as the creator (Historic England, n.d). The new facility, which opened on March 1, 1931, resembles Heaps and Holden’s contemporaneous renovation of Hounslow West station.
The station was an essential link in the network that connected different areas of London and made it easier for people to move around the city. At one point, the station comprised two distinct buildings that housed the ascending and descending platforms (Hollis & Gibson, 2005). In 1915, these structures were all consolidated into a single structure, which still stands today (Douglas, 2011). In 1987, the building’s façade was renovated, which assisted in maintaining the structure’s historical relevance and distinctive personality (Forsyth, 2013). The restoration has been an essential factor in the development of the city’s transportation infrastructure.
Heritage Assets/Significance
The Ealing Common London Regional Transport Underground Station is an important historical asset that should be preserved for future generations. Prior to 1879, more housing started to be built in the direction of Common Ealing, and thus, it was necessary to construct and provide transport, which is why the station construction was finished in 1879. The station opened its doors in 1879 as a part of the District Line extension, and it subsequently expanded in the 1930s (Noy & H., 2011).
Canopies over the platform areas and ornamental tiling are two examples of the station’s original Edwardian architecture and design characteristics that may still be seen today. The station has been an essential component of London’s transportation network for over a century. The station’s historical significance stems from its connection to the expansion and maturation of the London Underground system.
Aesthetic Value
The Ealing Common London Regional Transport Underground Station boasts some magnificent Edwardian architecture. The station’s complex elements and artistic embellishments create a powerful overall impression when seen visually. The architects gave significant thought to the exterior of the station, which resulted in a structure that was designed to be functional as well as aesthetically pleasing (Hollis & Gibson, 2005).
It has an appearance of refined sophistication due largely to the arched windows that line the station. Ornamental cornices are another element of the building’s design that contributes to the station’s overall appeal (Figure 3). The elevations of the building are complemented by the magnificent tiling found on the station platforms. The tilework throughout the station, which features both floral and geometric motifs, contributes to the building’s overall aesthetic appeal.
Ealing Common London Regional Transport Underground Station’s floral design is a stunning and one-of-a-kind aspect of the station that contributes to its overall attractiveness and warmly welcomes travelers. The station’s floral pattern is typical of Art Deco, a fashionable architectural style at the time. The floral design can be seen throughout the station, from the exterior to the ticketing area to the platform structures.
The ticketing area has a beautiful mosaic of multicolored flowers, and the platform structures are decorated with stylized flower and leaf relief sculptures. The station’s signs and directional arrows all feature a flower design. The platform buildings of Ealing Common station are flooded with light from the station’s massive arched windows. Stained glass panels depicting flowers and other natural elements fill the windows, further emphasizing the station’s floral motif.
Social/Cultural Value
The Ealing Common London Regional Transport Underground Station is significant in its importance to the local community and culture. The station is a vital connection point for commuters coming from the suburbs outside of London’s core who use public transportation to get into the city. This is an especially pressing concern for a neighborhood like Ealing Common, where many residents depend on public transportation to get to the city (Irvine & Maclennan, 2006).
The station’s proximity to the local residences makes it an important connection to the rest of London. The station is more than just a location from which one can travel; it is also the center of social activity in the neighborhood (Noy & H., 2011). By serving as a focal point for pre- and post-park get-togethers, the station has contributed to developing a community spirit in the surrounding area. Construction of the station was an essential component of an overarching strategy to improve the city’s transportation system, and it significantly contributed to the city’s economic development and population growth.
Craftsmanship/Materials Value
The Ealing Common London Regional Transport Underground Station was constructed using high-quality craftsmanship and materials. During the Edwardian era, when the station was built, people valued well-designed buildings that were created with care and precision. One such building was the station. The vivid red brickwork throughout the station is one of the most noticeable architectural characteristics of the building.
During the Edwardian period, red bricks were widely used as a building material because of their long lifespan and aesthetically pleasing appearance (Glover, 2007). The bricks used to construct the station were carefully selected and then arranged in a pattern that was supposed to give aesthetic interest. As a result, the building has a unique style. The brickwork at the station is accented with terracotta in many different places, so it is easy to find (Figure 4). Since the terracotta used in the station is of such high quality, it has been able to withstand the test of time without showing any signs of wear and tear (Glover, 2007).
In a similar vein, the tile work that can be found all over the station is a clear indication of the high quality of the structure (Figure 5). The gorgeous patterns and motifs that have been tiled into the floor are a direct reflection of the hard effort that was put in by the talented artisans who worked on this project.
Due to the high quality of its construction and the materials that were used, the Ealing Common London Regional Transport Underground Station is notable from an architectural and historical perspective. The station is a great example of Edwardian style and a tribute to the hard effort and genius of the builders who erected it (Emmitt et al., 2005). Not only is the station a wonderful illustration of the Edwardian style, but it is also a testament to the style. Because of the high quality of the materials used and the painstaking craftsmanship that went into its construction, the station has withstood the test of time and remained a distinctive neighborhood landmark over the years (Emmitt et al., 2005).
The station is covered in intricate tiling, terracotta detailing, and red brickwork, all visible throughout, which is evidence of the great quality of the building’s construction. The station’s sustained prominence as a community landmark and as an example of Edwardian craftsmanship can be attributed, in part, to these aspects, which have contributed to the station.
The Ealing Common London Regional Transport Tube Station is a tribute to the Arts and Crafts movement, both architecturally and mechanically, with its Edwardian architecture and engineering. The station was built during a significant change and innovation in London’s transportation infrastructure. Its design took into consideration the growing needs of the London Underground system, and its construction took place during this period. Cast-iron brackets hold the station’s platform canopies in place, making them an eye-catching component of the station’s design.
Design Value
Careful consideration was also given to the station’s architecture and layout to accommodate the requirements of the growing London Tube network. Platforms were arranged to make it simple and quick for passengers to board and alight from trains. At the same time, entrances and exits were positioned to make passenger movement through the station as seamless as possible. Another important component of the Ealing Underground station design is the safety of the passengers, which is provided by broad yellow lines separating the rails from the platform (Figure 6). The transition of the passengers from one side of the platform to another was also made with all the safety measures.
The platforms are designed in such a way that the passengers can have a pleasurable experience; for example, a space where they can rest is provided. Part of the platform is covered by roofs, so passengers can be there in case of rain.
Use Value
Located so close to Ealing Common, a popular park in the area, the station serves as a gathering place for the community. Convenience stores, eateries, and other vendors offering goods and services in the station’s main lobby are all helpful features for passengers and tourists. In addition, the station may also have information booths. The table below shows real-time departure times of the train to various destinations. It signifies the usage of the station and how important it is to the travelers.
Conditions
Several exterior issues and defects were discovered during a recent inspection of the Ealing Common London Regional Transport Underground Station. Three issues were specifically brought to light, all of which need to be resolved.
- The station’s external red brickwork was examined, and what seemed to be vertical fractures were discovered along the mortar joints (Figure 8). These cracks appeared due to the structure’s natural settlement over time, or they could have been a direct consequence of the building’s exposure to the elements, particularly the wind and the rain.
- Rust was found on several of the cast-iron brackets used to hold the platform canopies in place at the station. Rust can form on cast iron if it comes into contact with moisture or if water permeates the framework. To prevent the station from falling apart even worse than it already has, the rust on the brackets needs to be addressed as soon as possible.
- The magnificent tiling of floral and geometric patterns gracing the platform appears to have suffered some wear and tear over the years due to normal damage (Noy & H., 2011). This is likely the result of the continuous flow of people and the impacts of the sun and rain on the platform. Even though this fading has not compromised the station’s structural integrity, the station’s aesthetic appeal has been diminished.
Remedial Works
The Ealing Common London Regional Transport Underground Station has evolved into an indispensable neighborhood component throughout its history, serving locals, tourists, and commuters. A recent inspection, on the other hand, uncovered several problems that need to be rectified to ensure the station’s future safety and the preservation of its historical treasures (Irvine & Maclennan, 2006). Several plausible ways are available, any of which may be employed to get around these obstacles.
It was discovered that broken bricks were one of the most significant problems. The historical value of the station necessitates that any necessary repairs be carried out in a manner that will not cause any damage to the station’s architectural significance (Irvine & Maclennan, 2006). To accomplish this objective, it may be necessary to retain the services of an experienced mason who will monitor the cracks and patch them using a material consistent with the rest of the brickwork. When repairs are being conducted, the station’s structural integrity will be maintained.
During the inspection, water damage was also discovered. Despite appearances to the contrary, this is a significant issue that, if not handled, can result in significant structural damage. To stop water from getting inside the building, the windows and the rest of the façade need to be sealed (Irvine & Maclennan, 2006).
Maintaining a consistent cleaning schedule can help limit the possibility of dirt and grime formation, which can increase water damage over time (Irvine & Maclennan, 2006). This can be accomplished by keeping up with a regular cleaning regime. Throughout the inspection, the deterioration of the ornamental ironwork was the final issue discovered.
Regarding rust and corrosion, older buildings’ ironwork is more susceptible to damage. If one wants to address this issue, one might need to engage a metalwork contractor who can give the ornamental ironwork a full washing and remove any rust or corrosion that could be present. However, suppose the damage is too extensive.
In that case, it may be necessary to replace the decorative ironwork with brand-new components that are custom-made and exact replicas of the old ones (Gorse & Highfield, 2009). Cleaning the ironwork and applying a protective coating will slow its degradation (Earl, 2003). However, in this case, the floral patterns that constitute aesthetic value will be removed, which will damage the significance of the station.
Fixing the issues that have been occurring at the Ealing Common London Regional Transport Underground Station could be accomplished using several different strategies. The station may be brought back to its former splendor while preserving the structure’s historical significance (Gorse & Highfield, 2009).
This can be achieved by vigilantly looking for and repairing any signs of cracking in the brickwork, sealing the façade to prevent water damage, and cleaning and treating the ornate ironwork detail (Irvine & Maclennan, 2006). With the right approach, it is possible to preserve this historically significant edifice for the benefit of future generations.
Conclusion
Ultimately, fixing the problems at the Ealing Common London Regional Transport Underground Station is essential for keeping it secure, practical, and aesthetically pleasing. Cracks in the brickwork must be carefully monitored and repaired, the façade must be sealed to prevent water damage, and the beautiful ironwork must be cleaned and treated to bring the station back to its former grandeur while protecting its heritage values. Any repairs should be handled with extreme caution, perhaps with the help of specialized contractors, to protect the station’s historic design. As a result of these revitalization works, the Ealing Common London Regional Transport Underground Station will remain a prominent transportation hub and a symbol of the area’s rich cultural heritage for centuries to come.
Furthermore, the process of conducting this research has highlighted the importance of taking a holistic approach to corrective works, which includes considering the influence that one region of the building has on other regions, as well as the importance of conducting surveys regularly in order to detect flaws at an earlier stage. Overall, the material offered in this study is useful and illuminating concerning the importance of preserving the heritage values of buildings and the strategies that can be employed to achieve this goal.
Reference List
Alamy, L. (2021) ‘Ealing common underground tube station Art Deco architecture by Charles Holden Stock Photo,’ Alamy. Web.
Bowroaduk (2019) CO stock in Ealing Common Depot, Flickr. Yahoo! Web.
Ealing Today (2022). Trains not serving West Ealing Station due to safety concerns. Web.
Ealing Today (n.d.) ‘Welcome to ealingtoday.co.uk, the site for Ealing residents – and anyone planning to buy in Ealing, eat or shop in Ealing. For more on our aims, click here, Ealing’s Local Website.’ Web.
Douglas, J. (2011) Building adaptation. London: Spon Press Butterworth-Heinemann.
Earl, J. (2015) Building conservation philosophy. 3rd edn. London: Routledge.
Emmitt, S., Gorse, C.A. and Barry, R. (2005) Barry’s introduction to the construction of buildings. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
Forsyth, M., ed., 2013. Understanding historic building conservation. John Wiley & Sons.
Geograph. (2018). Ealing Common underground station, Greater London. Web.
Glover, P. (2007) Building surveys. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann c/o Esevier.
Gorse, C.A. and Highfield, D. (2009) Refurbishment and upgrading of Buildings. London, Maidenhead: MacGraw-Hill.
Guiterrez, D. (n.d.) London Underground photography by David Gutierrez, London architectural photographer., London photographer specialising in architectural, interior, real estate, property, cityscape, urban, modern design, travel, night photography, provides photography services, images for corporate, editorial , advertising market in London, UK.. Web.
Historic England. (n.d.) Ealing Common London regional transport underground station, including vestibule shops and platforms. Web.
Hollis, M. and Gibson, C. (2005) Surveying buildings. Conventry.: Rics Books.
Irvine, W. and Maclennan, F. (2006) Surveying for construction. London, Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
London Transport Museum. (n.d.) B/W print; Ealing Common and West Acton underground station exterior, District Line, 1907. Web.
Munro, E. (2019) Ealing Common Station Interior, Flickr. Yahoo! Web.
Noy, E.A. and H., D.J.E. (2011) Building surveys and reports. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Proust, M. (n.d.) Ealing common tube station, Mapcarta. Web.
The Enfield Society (2022) Piccadilly Underground stations, The Enfield Society. Web.
Transport for London | Every Journey Matters. (2019). Ealing Common Underground station. Transport for London. Web.