Introduction
The ethical issues that arise within the scope of the case are related to the field of privacy, and one’s right to know their health conditions. As a starting point, it should be stressed that Victoria is a minor daughter, which implies a number of crucial aspects.
Discussion
Particularly, her mother is eligible to decide what is best for Victoria and can require the staff not to intervene in their personal life. This is founded on the principle of privacy and respect for it. Then, Tina – as a mother – can decide not to reveal the diagnosis to her daughter. She is responsible for Victoria’s well-being and, as she said, her protection. Given such a state of affairs, the staff has no right to disclose the diagnosis to the daughter and violate the principle of privacy. They cannot act this way without Tina’s permission which would be essential in this vein.
On the other hand, it is important to take into account the background of the case. It is said that it was Tina’s fault that her daughter was born HIV-positive, given the history of Tina’s relationship with her boyfriend. Moreover, the staff cannot ignore the fact that Tina is likely to be wrong in her decision not to reveal the diagnosis to Victoria. This decision will cause harm to Victoria, as well as to young people with whom she will have sexual contact. The possible harm to society and Victoria is obvious, and the staff is to take action. Referring to the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct – its 1.06 provision, particularly – they can report the situation to eligible institutions (American Psychological Association, 2017).
Conclusion
The Ethics Committee will conduct an investigation of the case and may force Tina to disclose the diagnosis to Victoria. The provided information seems to be enough to resolve the situation and develop a further course of action in conjunction with the Ethical Committee.
Reference
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Web.