Introduction
Incomplete product content presented by the claim of product promoters limiting the information given to tell only part of their story is an intriguing claim. By advocating for the details proposing the use of the product, nutrient manufacturers can influence the decision of the consumer towards buying their products.
Discussion
For instance, in cases where the consumer exposes their information concerning previous problems of bones, the consumer whose product contains bone-strengthening minerals can tailor their explanation to the minerals towards the problem while neglecting the side effects and other major components of the supplement at hand. The consumer choice is, therefore, biased and based on the given information, which is quite limiting. The partial information aims to ensure customer satisfaction which directly translates to increased sales. However, this is a quack approach with a one-sided benefit to only the product seller.
Secondly, the concept of using questionnaires to indicate whether the customer needs direct supplements is quite ridiculous. By offering a set of questions on specific sampled data which is goal-oriented, the company aims to receive objective responses. However, in the process, there is unintentional bias due to the company introducing a specific perception of the nutritional matter. Despite being practical and introducing a standardized approach to meet its customers, most questionnaires often fail to receive honest feedback due to the impending fear associated with the whole method. In most cases, the scalability of the questionnaire ranges from a limited value due to the lack of an accurate diagnosis of the presumed problem.
Conclusion
The inaccuracies in the data collected regularly lead to a supplement sale to an ignorant customer. Being informed reduces the tendency of being duped by quacks whose primary goal is to make profits from the uninformed.