Background Information
Climate change is critical with regard to governance and political control in contemporary society (Andresen 2). Global leaders deliberate on appropriate methods that suffice in relation to climate control and sustainability. As political leaders strive to identify favorable solutions, researchers endeavor to devise and formulate a regime that augments recurrent desire for climate control (Andresen 7). There have been extensive studies with regard to causative realities and remedial steps that suffice in relation to climate change.
In order to guarantee positive outcomes, researchers adopt a multidisciplinary approach that seeks to synchronize ideas and thoughts from diverse fields of engagement in contemporary society (Andresen 12). It is important to note that climate change is a complex reality that necessitates dedication towards its resolution. Stakeholders encounter challenges that emanate from political leadership and conflict of interests among powerful state entities.
Such nations find it difficult to facilitate the implementation of remedial policies because they affect vital engagements within their jurisdiction (Andresen 12). Development of global climate control regime can only materialize through political involvement and dedication. In the absence of such efforts, it is impossible for global leaders and stakeholders to guarantee formulation and propagation of an appropriate climate control regime (Andresen 14).
This research undertaking seeks to analyze factors that affect the development of effective a global climate control regime. It will contextualize diverse realities that hamper the realization of sustainable solutions in realms of climate change and degeneration. In order to achieve the aforementioned objectives, this essay will utilize information from credible and authoritative academic publications.
Contextual realities in global climate control
As earlier mentioned, climate change is a complex reality that manifests in contemporary society. It portends negative implications that ultimately curtail recurrent desire for environmental wellness and sustainability (Andresen 15). It is difficult for global leaders to counter the effects of climate change due to contextual thresholds that define its initiation, sustenance, and propagation. Research experts should strive to demystify diverse realities that suffice with regard to climate change and environmental degeneration (Andresen 17).
Devoid of such measures, it is difficult for authorities to formulate sustainable policies that support climate control. In order to develop such policies, global leaders should understand the inherent dichotomy of climate change and contextualize efforts that bolster such undertakings (Andresen 19). The complex orientation of climate change creates the need for collaborative efforts among stakeholders in diverse fields of interest. Climate change suffices in diverse realms of interest within society.
Therefore, it is necessary for leaders to fuse policies that complement the formulation of such paradigms of climate control and sustainability (Andresen 22). Climate control regimes should conceptualize ideas that relate to pertinent spheres of political, social, economic, and cultural engagements. On the other hand, political and social leaders must guarantee goodwill in order to propagate appropriate avenues of implementation (Andresen 22).
Perception plays an important role in guaranteeing the realization of requisite progress in relation to the formulation and actualization of climate control mechanisms. Currently, leaders popularize climate change as a global concern that is beyond domestic legislation and involvement (Young 34). They participate in global conferences that seek to formulate policies with regard to mitigation of environmental degradation. However, leaders do not facilitate domestic efforts toward the implementation of such policies (Young 34).
Although there is a need for global involvement, leaders must take decisive action against domestic factors that facilitate the propagation of negative environmental practices. Climate change requires multidisciplinary efforts that create the impetus for action towards the eradication of inappropriate environmental practices (Windram 21). Boardroom engagements are not sufficient to eradicate factors that predispose the environment to degradation.
Such efforts require dedication and willingness to make crucial decisions that affect existent political establishments (Windram 21). Countries must implement eco-friendly measures at the domestic level. Consequently, domestic gains spread to the global arena, thereby creating an opportunity for sustainability and progress with regard to environmental management (Windram 24).
Climate control revolves around international participation and creation of domestic frameworks that support the establishment of appropriate regimes. In the absence of political involvement, environmental agencies cannot actualize basic functions that gear towards climate control and sustainability in contemporary society (Windram 27).
Financial realities also affect the effective formulation and implementation of legislation that seeks to alleviate environmental degradation (Victor 69). Environmental legislative efforts require a huge amount of funds in order to ensure a comprehensive resolution of recurrent challenges within realms of diverse engagements (Victor 69). Donor agencies allocate funds that gear towards the creation of structural frameworks and avenues for implementing climate control.
However, most developing countries do not utilize such funds for the intended purpose. They often divert funds to other less viable ventures that do not satisfy thresholds of urgency as compared to climate change and environmental degradation (Victor 73). Developing countries also face challenges that relate to corruption and mismanagement of funds.
In most cases, leaders in such countries siphon public funds into private accounts, thereby jeopardizing efforts that seek to develop structures to counter climate change and resultant environmental degradation (Victor 75). Although such leaders do not admit wrongdoing, it is evident that developing countries do not exhibit commitment with regard to climate control and sustainability.
It is important for global leaders to guarantee the allocation of sufficient funds for climate control and other related activities in realms of environmental management (Trilling 42). Developed countries have duty and responsibility to promote climate control because it affects current and future prospects with regard to sustainability in the world. Climate control requires global attention because future generations are at risk of losing out on benefits that emanate from suitable environmental thresholds (Trilling 43).
Developed countries should also make more contribution to climate control because they are the largest polluters. Their corporate and economic activities revolve around mining, construction, manufacturing, and other related areas that contribute to excessive emission of industrial fumes. Industrial fumes are key contributors to environmental degradation and other negative implications such as global warming (Trilling 44).
Traditional frameworks of financial flow in climate control are culpable for the inherent disconnect between donors and recipient nations. Ordinarily, developing countries depend on funding from developed countries and international donor agencies (Nye, 57). Such countries do not make any efforts towards climate control and environmental management. Their domestic regimes do not consider climate control as a vital component in contemporary settings.
There is a need for holistic and concerted efforts that seek to overhaul existent paradigms of financial flow with regard to climate control and environmental management (Nye 57). Developing countries should incorporate climate control into domestic policy thresholds in order to guarantee continuity and sustainability in environmental management (Nye 59).
The international community and donor agencies should demand global commitment in order to sustain cooperation with developing countries. They should draft legislation to govern the formulation of climate control policies in developing countries (Nye 62).
Such intervention is necessary because climate change is a reality that could distort ecological patterns in the future. Developing countries should initiate domestic efforts and policies that support the allocation of funds towards realization and propagation of climate control (Nye 65).
Ideological views and responses play an important role in determining the orientation of stakeholders with regard to climate control. Due to current technological developments, stakeholders preoccupy with the formulation of policies that revolve around technology and its impact on climate regime in contemporary society (Depledge 31). Most assumptions fail to recognize that climate change is a multifaceted reality that requires holistic and concerted intervention.
The complex nature of climate change necessitates paradigm shifts in areas that characterize its management and avoidance. Most countries strive to develop technology at the expense of relevant policies that pre-empt climate change and environmental degradation (Depledge 33). Technological developments are responsible for high rates of climate change and environmental degradation. It is important for countries to develop policy frameworks that regulate development, adaptation, and application of technology.
Unregulated technological developments precipitate environmental disasters that often affect human existence and propagation in social contexts (Depledge 36). Legislative biases lead to misplaced prioritization of efforts and resources that seek to enhance climate control and management. For instance, most organizational and statutory provisions cite technology as the foremost contributor to climate change and environmental degradation (Brooks 78).
Such frameworks fail to recognize political, social, economic, and cultural considerations that affect climate control and governance. It is evident that climate control requires political goodwill and participation at all levels of implementation (Brooks, 78). Political leadership plays a central role in lobbying support for climate control initiatives. Most decisions and initiatives emanate from political platforms that suffice in diverse thresholds of engagement among global leaders.
Therefore, political leaders should utilize official platforms that present the opportunity for progress with regard to the formulation of global climate control regime (Brooks 81). They should also enhance the development of domestic statutory provisions that accentuate the realization of the aforementioned objectives. Such efforts cannot materialize in the absence of financial and political facilitation (Brown 14). Authorities should endeavor to influence decisions and policies that seek to bolster the realization of global climate control.
On the other hand, lobbyists should focus on pertinent issues that manifest with regard to climate change and environmental degradation (Brown 17). If not well covered, environmental degradation could affect ecological thresholds that support human existence and propagation in contemporary contexts.
Global climate control is an incumbent function of global leaders because it falls within their jurisdiction (Brown 21). It remains a vital component with regard to the realization of a sustainable and progressive relationship between human beings and the environment. Inappropriate application of technology affects ecological balance, thereby precipitating extensive damage to the environment (Brown 23).
Conclusion
Climate change is a critical issue with regard to governance and political control in contemporary society. Global leaders continue to deliberate on appropriate methods that suffice in relation to climate control and sustainability (Smith 69). As political leaders strive to establish favorable solutions, researchers endeavor to devise and formulate a regime that augments recurrent desire for climate control.
There have been extensive studies with regard to causative realities and remedial steps that suffice in relation to climate change (Smith 73). Development of a global climate control regime is a venture that necessitates support from relevant stakeholders.
However, it remains elusive due to numerous realities that characterize its realization (Smith 76). Global leaders should pursue avenues that guarantee speedy formulation of legislative provisions that support the establishment of an effective global climate control regime. It is important to note that most developed countries are uncooperative in efforts that seek to achieve sustainable and effective global climate control (Smith 79).
Works Cited
Andresen, Steinar. International Environmental Agreements: An Introduction. Newyork: Routledge, 2012. Print.
Brooks, Richard. Law and Ecology: Rise of the Ecosystem Regime. London: Ashgate, 2002. Print.
Brown, Janet. Global Environmental Politics. London: Westview Press, 2010. Print.
Depledge, Joanna. The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures. London: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Print.
Nye, Joseph. Governance in a Globalizing World. Newyork: Brookings Institution Press, 2000. Print.
Smith, Lester. Plan B: Rescuing a Planet under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble. Sussex: Norton, 2003. Print.
Trilling, Julia. Global Climate Change: European and American Policy Responses. Los Angeles: University of California, 2008. Print.
Victor, David. Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet. London: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Print.
Windram, Craig. International Trade and Climate Change Policies. Newyork: Earthscan, 2012. Print.
Young, Oran. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioural Mechanisms. Newyork: MIT Press, 2009. Print.