In essence, guilt belongs to each person’s inner morality category. As a rule, it is always an emotional phenomenon. Guilt is a profound experience of inconsistency with a generally recognized morality that one feels before others. Since this concept belongs to the internal categories of morality, one always experiences it individually, without regard to the opinions of others. However, even though guilt is exceptionally personalized, publicity has the right to evaluate the choices of others. People often condemn each other for actions that contradict their beliefs without considering the reasons for such behavior. The motive for certain decisions consistently has a reason that can be weighty. However, even if the global situation is unfair, blame must be assessed in each case of personal interaction.
Communication with parents, peers, and the subculture in which a person is formed affects personality formation. The transition from individual to personality entails significant changes in traits, which tend to be directed toward greater maturity and stability. Under certain circumstances, however, even initially, innocent people can be involved in terrible things. When it comes to unethical behavior, well-mannered people are not inclined to go to extremes, but sometimes mind games can play tricks on even the most upright and positive characters. For example, bullying a person at school undoubtedly impacts character building. A person who has experienced injustice for a long time has a greater desire to assert oneself and prove ones worth. However, there is a high chance that a person who has experienced injustice will begin to copy the behavior of the abusers and take revenge or self-assert themselves at the expense of others. The root of this is global injustice because no one deserves to be wronged. Nevertheless, doing wrong in return cannot be considered justified.
Thus, the category of guilt must be evaluated case by case, and injustice is not a reason for the lack of local guilt. Each obedience can refer to right or wrong, rational or irrational, and can be evaluated in terms of guilt. Each interaction is remarkable, and one cannot generalize behavior and evaluate it solely in terms of general injustice. In doing an act, a person makes a choice, and everyone should be able to consider that choice and condemn or justify the person.