Difference Between Influenza and COVID-19
To begin with, coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is caused by a virus rather than bacteria. COVID-19 is caused by a virus that belongs to the Coronaviridae family of viruses. Antibiotics have little effect on viruses. As a consequence, some persons who fall unwell with COVID-19 may get a bacterial infection. Antibiotics may be suggested in this scenario by a health care practitioner. The difference in transmission speed between the two viruses is significant. Compared to the COVID-19 virus, influenza has a shorter median incubation duration and a shorter serial interval. The COVID-19 virus has a serial interval of 5-6 days, whereas the influenza virus has a serial interval of 3 days. As a result, influenza can spread more quickly than COVID-19.
COVID-19 Impact on Buisness
Just a few weeks after the pandemic began and before the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act became available, the epidemic had already caused tremendous disruption among small enterprises. COVID-19 caused virtually all of the temporary closures, which accounted for 43% of all company closures. Reduced demand and staff health concerns were the leading causes for temporary closures, with supply chain disruptions playing a minor role. Since January, firms have reported a 39 percent reduction in active employment on average. COVID-19 may focus on attention, but it is only one of eight major macro trends that will transform the industry in the coming decade. The worldwide pandemic will have a long-term and far-reaching influence on business, but other macroeconomic developments, such as systematic distrust, deteriorating international ties, and climate change, are still present.
COVID-19’s effects will be primarily influenced by how long the epidemic lasts. People will revert to pre-pandemic modes of working more swiftly if the time limit is reduced. People, for example, returned to normal flying behavior three years following 9/11. If the pandemic continues, long-term social consequences are increasingly likely. For example, the Great Depression had a long-term influence on eating patterns.
The Sudden Appearance of a Pandemic
To most people in 2006, the notion of an unknown virus spilling out of a wild animal into humans, triggering person-to-person transmission and a worldwide pandemic, seemed a long way off. A different coronavirus was discovered in the body of a 68-year-old man returning from business in the Arabian Peninsula in 2015. Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome (MERS) had been identified as a sickness three years beforehand and was dubbed “camel flu” because dromedary camels seemed to carry and transmit the virus to humans. However, the MERS virus may have originated in bats – perhaps the Egyptian tomb bat.
It is possible that it infected humans before 2012, but those illnesses remained undiscovered. It is unknown whether the Korean businessman was infected by a camel or contracted the disease from a person during his stops in Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. However, that question probably did not matter to the 186 South Koreans who were infected directly or indirectly from him, and even less to the 38 who died.
It is difficult for the global community to invest in something that you consider to be risky. Spending much money, especially if it is government money, is a risk in and of itself, even if it is necessary to protect against a more significant risk. When there is a Sars outbreak, a swine flu pandemic, or an Ebola epidemic, government leaders and private donors respond with frightening generosity, but these types of investments disappear entirely when the crisis ends. These circumstances explain the reason why the world was not ready for a pandemic. We may be better prepared for the next epidemic, but it is too late to prepare for this one.