Introduction
Explicit review of this analytical paper resonates within an unlimited time frame. Reflectively, the review will authenticate relevance of the research article, the foundations of Henri Fayol’s administrative theory by Wren, Badeian, and Breeze which comprehensively capture conceptualization ideas discussed within its periphery of ideal and actualization.
Besides, the paper reflects on the methodology strategy and adopted methods which appear to have employed qualitative and quantitative analysis in the thoughts of Henri Fayols on administration and management. In addition, the critique investigates research designs and conceptualized results which are quantifiable and assess the same in terms of relevance in the present organization structure.
The scope in this scenario is to capture influence of environment on performance in organizations across continents of the global society. In the conclusive segment, evaluation of originality, presentation of alternative recommendations, and conceptualization are placed in order to ensure relevance in review of prospect schema.
Components of the article
This article comprehensively reflects on the aspects administration and management. As a matter of fact, the article is clear on segmentation of the research targets which are dynamics and unique aspects of qualitative management.
In addition, the title captures focus of the research article as that pointed towards understanding a quantifiable aspect of environment on social welfare in place of work. Also, the findings and recommendations presented in this research article are non restrictive and may paint actual picture of structural aspects of management administration in different environments.
Main idea
The article gives an analysis of responsive organization framework. This sufficiently provides series of answers that are full of assumptions. As a matter of fact, most of references used in this article are up to date and presents an accurate literature review on current issues of the topic.
Therefore, it put into account various social and technological dynamics that directly impact workplace environment. Besides, the authors are specific on timeframe for the alleged causes and measurement indices for an otherwise result. As observed in the research methodology, the author employed the use of quantitative research methodology which measures assumptions given and reflectively develops quantifiable results.
This comprehensively captures the key theme which is reflection on influence of perceived and real environmental factors on performance of management and administrative policies. Moreover, since this paper dwells on aspects of role congruity, workplace initiative, supervisory roles, and other physical environmental factors, use of observations and direct interviews provides an accurate data.
Application
The author employs simple correlation analysis involving measurement of dependent and independent variables. These variables are space and facilities required in doing the job, relationship with supervisors at the workplace, equity and treatment at workplace, communication systems at work place, and environmental factors at work place. The simultaneous application and measurement of independent and dependent variable are great and captures true value representation of the target population.
In addition, I would recommend the author to use intrusive regression analysis that quantifies relationship between two variables. The relationship between the two variables can be expanded to more variables grouped in pairs. Formula for intrusive regression analysis; Y=a+ bx represents respective factors that are dependent and independent for every measurement and give room for interchangeability and testing special data.
When properly used, regression analysis produces quantifiable and realistic results within a minimal error range. In practicality, the research may assign variable Y to represent essence of communication systems at work and their relevance to duties carried out by employees and x being a dependent variable such as intrinsic motivational input by management. The same procedure is used to calculate the results for Y variable when x is an extrinsic part of the motivational aspect.
This calculation is repeated for the number of measurement variables to obtain accurate relationship and correlation between every pair of quantifiable factors. Once respective values are obtained, it is easier to mathematically draw intrinsic and extrinsic relationship between dependent and independent variables. Though the research work appears comprehensive and professional, it is apparent that the author has not included an appendix sheet for sample of the questionnaire, introduction letter, number of question asked, and forms of questions.
Conclusion
The most essential part of a properly written research paper should reflect on conceptualization and maintain originality. This research paper doesn’t provide a clear link between one variable to another and is majorly based on assumptions. Besides, the analysis presented presents a complete reflection of actual situation in different work environments. Due to special nature of the interest group, every work environment is unique.
Therefore, results obtained in this analysis are not biased and void of actual situation in work environment. Different work environments require different motivational factors. For instance, technical work environment is inclined towards following strict safety rules. On the other hand, social work environment is flexible to different conditions. In order to build an ideal work environment, organization structuring should be inclined towards inclusion of managerial perspective since this organ monitors progress of the working group.
Specifically, a good working environment should be flexible, relevant, and comfortable within set measurement standards that support intrinsic and extrinsic relationship environment has on performance of employees. However, these measures should be specific to a work environment, skills of employees, and goals of an organization. Besides, it is important to consider the size of an organization and nature of its duties. Conclusively, this article captures various issues on environmental impact on administration and management.
Literature
Wren, D., Bedeian, A., & Breeze, J. (2002). The foundations of Henri Fayol’s administrative theory. Management Decision Journal, 40(9), 906-918.