Hillary Clinton’ Education Policy Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda®
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

Introduction

Hillary Clinton is one of the potential candidates for the 2016 American presidential elections. Clinton plans to formulate new policies that can transform the country’s education policy. Obama’s government implemented new changes in the education sector. However, many people believe that “such policy changes have been controversial” (Hillary Clinton on Education, 205, para. 4). Hillary Clinton is “a Democratic reformer who wants to increase performance and accountability in every American school” (West, 2014, p. 4). Clinton’s objectives are by the famous Democrats for Education Reform (DFER). This essay gives a detailed analysis of the policy changes proposed by Clinton.

Proposed Educational Policy

Many Democratic Reformers such as Hillary Clinton want to improve the American education system. She plans to implement specific measures to get the best outcomes. Some of these measures include “better data collection methods, school choice policies, and high academic standards” (Bernstein, 2008, p. 43). She also plans “to protect the rights of every teacher” (West, 2014, p. 5). She “also plans to link teacher pay to student performance” (Allen & Parnes, 2015, p. 28). Clinton also plans to improve the quality of early childhood education. The “proposed policy borrows a lot from the No Child Left Behind Act” (Clinton, 2015, p. 32).

The new policy will ensure the government increases its investments in childhood education. The policy will also support more teachers to provide quality education (West, 2014). The candidate also plans to improve the funding of different American schools (Clinton, 2015). The other complimentary strategy seeks to offer better pay to American teachers.

Making Predictions

The above policy does not seek to transform the common standards embraced in the country’s educational sector. However, the policy will improve the quality of education availed to every American learner. The current “education system seeks to increase access to charter schools” (Allen & Parnes, 2015, p. 42). This reformation policy will ensure every child gets quality education. Experts believe that Hillary Clinton will “support merit pay for teachers based on their scores” (Williams, 2015, p. 4). She will also support charter schools in the country.

Hillary Clinton also plans “to focus on education without bringing in politics” (Williams, 2015, p. 4). She also plans to empower more children from disadvantaged backgrounds. According to Clinton, a universal pre-kindergarten will be essential towards supporting the educational needs of every student (Hillary Clinton on Education, 2015). The policy will also support more teachers. This practice will ensure such teachers improve their skills.

Diminishing Negative Implications

This discussion shows how Hillary Clinton plans to address various problems affecting the American education system. Early education will be a major focus for this presidential aspirant. The decision to reward teachers for their excellence will encourage them to support the needs of more learners (Williams, 2015). Such efforts will address most of the challenges affecting the country’s education sector. New subjects such as arts should be supported to empower more learners (“Hillary Clinton”, 2008). Such subjects have been lacking in the country’s education system (Williams, 2015). These practices will transform the nature of the country’s educational system.

Enhancing Positive Implications

The above proposal has the potential to present positive implications. For instance, the new policy will “support new investments in early childhood education” (Williams, 2015, p. 5). This approach will “change the outcomes of many individuals in their lives” (Kelin, 2015, p. 6). Teachers will also be encouraged to implement new practices that can produce the best outcomes. Teachers will acquire new skills and competencies. Such skills will make it easier for them to empower their learners. New evaluation systems will be introduced for different teachers. Such systems will ensure every teacher focuses on the best educational outcomes. The issue of funding will also be taken seriously. Equitable funding will eventually improve the quality of American education.

Considering my Philosophies on Education

My philosophy on education is founded on the No Child Left Behind Act. The philosophy supports the provision of quality resources. Historical theories support the use of quality educational resources. Such resources can support the educational needs of more children. That being the case, Hillary Clinton’s policy on education will support the needs of many learners. She proposes new practices that can equip schools with more funds. This strategy will ensure more schools provide quality education to their learners. Social theories support the provision of quality education to different populations. Clinton’s focus on “early-childhood education will also produce positive outcomes” (West, 2014, p. 5). Early-childhood education “creates the required background for fulfillment in life” (Kelin, 2015, p. 6). Different educational theories can address various challenges in every learning stage. Social theories also support the changing needs of learners with diverse educational needs (Kelin, 2015). The above theories have the potential to empower more learners.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the agreeable fact is that different federal issues will affect the country’s education system. Leaders should promote the best policies to support the educational needs of more learners. Parents, educationists, politicians, and teachers should work together to develop new policies (West, 2014). Such policies will produce the best results. This approach will deliver quality education to every learner.

Reference List

Allen, J., & Parnes, A. (2015). HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton. New York, NY: Broadway Books.

Bernstein, C. (2008). A Woman in Charge: The Life of Hillary Rodham Clinton. New York, NY: Vintage.

Clinton, H. (2015). Hard Times. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

Hillary Clinton on Education. (2015). Web.

Hillary Clinton: The Education Candidate. (2008). VC Echoes, 10(4), 1-16.

Kelin, A. (2015). Web.

West, D. (2014). . Web.

Williams, C. (2015). . Web.

Print
More related papers
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2020, July 14). Hillary Clinton' Education Policy. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hillary-clinton-education-policy/

Work Cited

"Hillary Clinton' Education Policy." IvyPanda, 14 July 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/hillary-clinton-education-policy/.

References

IvyPanda. (2020) 'Hillary Clinton' Education Policy'. 14 July.

References

IvyPanda. 2020. "Hillary Clinton' Education Policy." July 14, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hillary-clinton-education-policy/.

1. IvyPanda. "Hillary Clinton' Education Policy." July 14, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hillary-clinton-education-policy/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Hillary Clinton' Education Policy." July 14, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hillary-clinton-education-policy/.

Powered by CiteTotal, citation maker
If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
Cite
Print
1 / 1