The law provides a structure that governs the nation. Hence, the law outlines what is legal and unlawful. Additionally, where the law fails to elaborate, the other junior rules apply. Therefore, the law governs the political sphere by providing legislation that directs all the political activities. The political undertakings include elections and appointments to the governmental positions. On the social setting, there are countless laws that govern how people should relate. They include marriage laws, bill of rights, and the law of torts. The above examples are few of laws that relate to the social setting. The law ensures stability in the business sector through the numerous statutes. The statutes include the company law, the law contract and other legal acts. Overall, the law maintains stability through the diverse acts that constitute the entire legal framework.
Examples of where the law did not guarantee justice
The current violence in Mexico presents incidences where the law fails to enforce justice. Minimal victims of the drug violence have received justice since the illegal rackets are numerous with enormous resources. Additionally, individuals are afraid to witness against the violators of the law since they fear retaliatory attacks. The government troops in Syria have attacked civilians mercilessly leading to deaths despite the nation’s comprehensive legal framework. However, the political atmosphere cannot allow the implementation of the law. The solution to such a problem emanates from the political front where the opposing factions negotiate a deal. The South African apartheid regime hideously desecrated human rights in the late 20th century. However, leaders never suffered any legal consequences for the violations. A negotiated deal resolved the circumstances. Furthermore, the two factions established commissions that set the means to reconcile the citizenry.
Outcome of the Casey Anthony trial
The trial cleared Casey of any misdoing and only guilty of presenting false evidence. The trial generated massive controversy since Casey, a young mother, had murdered her young child. Nonetheless, the judicial system cleared her of any offence. To people, the ruling was unpopular and diminished confidence in an institution that ought to uphold justice.
Examples of exclusive federal jurisdiction
The term denotes a matter in which the regime has absolute control. Other legal authorities have no power upon any matter under the exclusive jurisdiction. The matters under the sole jurisdiction are of absolute importance nationally. They include deals relating to the radioactive materials and the safety of the environment. Once a matter falls under this jurisdiction, the central authority has an absolute control. Matters under this authority are of the national interest. Additionally, certain matters relating to the military fall under this category where the central power has the total discretion. Consequently, there are definite issues that concern the environment, the military and the radioactive material fall under the sole jurisdiction.
The U.S. Supreme Court reviews
Currently, the Supreme Court is cautious in making reviews of suits presided over by junior courts. Previously, the Supreme Court accepted applications for reviews depending on the right. Nonetheless, there is a procedure, which vets all the application for reviews. The vetting process denies most applications since it entrusted its authority to the circuit courts. The Supreme Court re-examines cases where decisions have constitutional inconsistencies. Moreover, it reviews suits with circuit splits.
Disparities among trial courts and appellate courts
The hearing of suits commence in a trial court. However, an appellate court provides an avenue to reverse the conclusion made in the prior court. Trial courts witness the initial presentation of proof utilized in the appellate court without any additions. The decisions by trial courts affect the defendant and the plaintiff. Conversely, those of an appellate court may influence additional parties such as lower courts that have to abide by such a decision.