Introduction
Nowadays, the problem of the ecological situation is an important area in many studies. The state of human health directly depends on the environment, and therefore, people should be aware of the situations around them. In this case, the informants are magazine and newspaper articles, as well as news on television and the Internet. The articles Forget Shorter Shower” and “Waste Not, Want Not have” represent a set of knowledge and ideas about current issues and how to respond to them. It should be emphasized that the two vital texts have a common narrative structure, message, ideas, and explanations about the proper interaction of man and nature.
Main body
First of all, it is worth noting that the articles by Jensen and McKibben have several similarities and coincidences. The texts relate to a specific style of speech and narration – in this case, journalistic. In addition, in the works of the two authors, there are such characteristic artistic techniques as irony and notes of sarcasm. The writers use such a literary technique as the deliberate repetition of words or phrases to find a response from the reader and create a symbolic understanding of the world. Jensen sets out in a short and precise form the problems of the effectiveness of specific measures. Whereas McKibben talks about the types of waste that violate the natural cycles of life in nature and have negative consequences for humans. Moreover, they clearly follow the logic and structure of mental activity, see the whole picture, and identify problems and ways to eradicate existing environmental “ailments.” They touch on those aspects of public life, which previously, even if they paid attention to, but did not speak out, did not cover these pressing problems for everyone to see and understand.
Jensen’s statements subtly and satirically address historical moments and interpret them in the spectrum of modern realities. There, the author asks several questions about the root causes of blatant injustice in relation to the environment and the consequences that have occurred. The author points to the inaction, lack of initiative of the people to influence the state of the entire planet, and unwillingness to respond to current difficulties and radically change the future of the next generations. Thus, he gives readers food for thought, a starting point for independent ideas. Jensen teaches them to think and not just to contemplate what is happening in the world. Together with his audience, the writer attempts to find intelligible answers to the questions posed in his arguments.
McKibben states in his article that the natural heritage is increasingly threatened by destruction due not only to natural events but also by the actions of the public. These impacts can further aggravate the situation, causing dangerous, harmful, and destructive environmental phenomena. It also opens the eyes of the public to the truth that exists within the current realities but in a slightly different form. Undoubtedly, exhaust gases from cars, deforestation, and waste in the form of plastic polymers are sources of negative impact on the climate, the water that people drink, and the air they breathe. However, if you look at the situation more broadly and deeply, people, their lack of initiative, passivity, and inertia remain to blame.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the articles titled “Forget Shorter Showers” and “Waste Not, Want Not” have a similar style and structure of narration. They emphasize the concepts and elements inherent in the current existence and reality. Thanks to their writing skills and professional competencies, Jensen and McKibben hint not only at current problems and their initiators but also offer ways to influence the eradication of difficult situations occurring around the world.