Introduction
The collapse of the Soviet Union marked the end of the Cold War and the polarization of the world. Even though the event seems to be beneficial for humanity in the long run, the effects of the matter are numerous and complex. On the one hand, the collapse of the Soviet Union led to the rapid acceleration of regional security cooperation in the region, which is crucial for human security.1 Indeed, since the boundaries have dissolved, it seems natural that countries should be more open to cooperation. On the other hand, Simão claims that broader analysis leads to the understanding that post-Soviet societies suffer from instability and increasingly complex forms of insecurity.2 For instance, Leinsalu et al. report the increased number of conflicts based on ethnic differences and nationalistic moods.3 Such observations lead to the understanding that short- and long-term implications of the collapse of the Soviet Union concerning human security are controversial.
One of the pivotal matters is human rights and the protection of citizens of post-soviet countries. Soviet people were deprived of some of the central human rights, and the collapse of the regime should have positively influenced the matter. In the Soviet Union, people did have freedom of religion, and Stalin’s policies were explicitly nationalistic.4 After the collapse of the USSR, Post-Soviet countries made human rights one of the primary concerns.5 However, in Russia, human rights are applied in a week manner even 28 years after the regime has dissolved.6 The present paper aims at answering the question of what are the short-term and long-term implications of the collapse of the USSR for human rights in Russia. This paper argues that despite the apparent positive impact of the event, the human rights of Russian citizens are still often violated.
Historical Background
The collapse of the Soviet Union came as a complete surprise since neither western nor Soviet authorities believed that the country could disappear so rapidly. However, on December 25, 1991, the Soviet flag flew over Moscow Kremlin for the last time.7 On this day, the representatives of 12 Soviet republics declared the USSR no longer existed, and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) was established.8 There are different reasons cited for the matter, including a wide variety of external and internal causes.
The history of the Soviet Union began after the Russian revolution in 1917 when Bolsheviks came to power.9 Later, in 1922, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was established under the leadership of Vladimir Lenin, a Marxist leader.10 While initially the state was meant to be a society of true democracy, Stalin’s brutal regime and strengthening of the authoritative power of the Communist Party turned the country into a repressive state.11 However, in 1985, Gorbachev tried to turn the country back to democracy through political openness, or glasnost, and economic restructuring, also known as perestroika.12 Gorbachev’s policies are often cited as the reason for the collapse of the Soviet Union.
There were no significant economic or political pressures that could be stated as the reason for the desolation of the USSR. On the contrary, the country has recovered from a substantial drop in oil prices, and all the political goals of the previous decade were achieved.13 However, after the 1980 Olympics in Moscow, a remarkable break in consciousness was instilled in the minds of Soviet People.14 Political openness and all the press published by political opposition made people of the USSR realize that the rules of the country humiliated its people.15 In other words, the lack of political freedom and human rights was the primary driving force of the changes in the society of the country.
One of the reasons for the oppression of Soviet society was the extensive power of KGB and its leaders. KGB was the symbol of despotic Soviet rule since it was the tool used to maintain strict obedience of non-Russian republics to Moscow and suppress aspirations to any form of independence.16 In other words, even though the country was formally a union of 15 independent states, any autonomy was viewed as a threat to the regime. Any separatist moods were controlled, and people suspected of spreading such attitudes were thrown behind bars without a trial.17 However, the policy of glasnost led to the release of many oppositionists, which spread the word about the unjust nature of KGB.18 Eventually, KGB was unable to control all the new ideas in the press and the streets, and the suppression was ended by the dissolution of the USSR.
While most historians agree that the new way of thinking was the primary reason for the cardinal change, others suppose that the greed of the elite was the reason for the event. The soviet elite wanted to enrich themselves using the most valuable state property, which was possible only if USSR dissolved.19 Instead of creating a democratic state, the elite wanted to protect their property. This led to the idea that a corrupt regime was needed to ensure the power of money.20 In other words, while the abolishment of the Soviet Union had promising rhetoric behind it, the primary driving force may have been the desire for more power and money among the Soviet elite.
Analysis
Short-Term Implications
Before discussing the short-term consequences of the collapse of the Soviet Union, it is necessary to provide two definitions. The present paper treats all the effects of the dissolution within ten years after the event as short-term implications. Long-term implications are the effects, which can be witnessed after Vladimir Putin came to power. In other words, the present paper discusses two periods, the rule of Boris Yeltsin and the presidency of Vladimir Putin and Dmitry Medvedev.
The collapse of the oppressive regime promised a paradigm shift in human rights in Russia. However, according to Nowakowski, “transitions toward more democratic forms of governance and market economies have faced many obstacles, and have not necessarily facilitated the protection of such rights.”21 For the first decade, Russia was disturbed by the uncertainty in all spheres, including civic society, medicine, education, gender equality, ethnic conflicts, and rights of disabled and sexual minorities.
Even though civic society was granted by the Constitution of the Russian Federation accepted after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russians were still unable to join an organization freely. The Constitution gives the right to enter any society without prosecution;22 however, the extensive bureaucracy was used to limit the possibilities of NGOs.23 The media and the pressed was controlled by the government and failed to investigate the abuse and killings of activists and reporters.24 However, citizens were granted a chance to practice any religion, which was prohibited before the fall of the USSR.25 While there reports that “non-traditional” religions were still open to suppression and threats26, the change in this field was positive.
Initially, the fall of the Soviet Union significantly decreased access to healthcare and education. Danton reports that around 700,000 Russian citizens died every year due to the health crises.27 These problems had a particular effect on disabled people since healthcare and schooling facilities were not adjusted to meet the requirements for the special-needs population.28 At the same time, during the first decade after the collapse of the USSR, there were numerous reports about the oppression of ethnic minorities,29 violations of human rights in the Russian military due to an unsuccessful reform,30 and an increased number of human trafficking.31 Additionally, discrimination against women was a common feature since women are viewed as caretakers of the household and children, while men did not participate in these activities.32 However, despite the overall poor attention to human rights in Russia in the 1990s, there were some positive changes that need to be mentioned.
First, while the sexual minorities were still discriminated against, the emergence of the Russian Federation provided a legal background for further development. In the Soviet Union, homosexuality was illegal, and people could be put to prison for being gay or lesbian.33 While Russian people and authorities still consider homosexuality immoral, at least it was excluded from criminal codebooks. Such a drastic change may lay a beginning to the policy of tolerance towards LGBTQ. The same was done for disabled people since the Constitution declared the equality of opportunity as the primary principle.
Second, even though the opposing press was still controlled, it became legal to criticize any social or political issues. Article 59 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation declares that “defense of the Fatherland shall be a duty and obligation of citizens of the Russian Federation.”34 Law enforcers often stated that criticism of the government might be viewed as a failure to adhere to this article.35 However, the legal basis for the future elimination of the press was set during the period, which is a positive consequence of the dissolution of the USSR.
Third, citizens of Russia no longer needed to state their nationality in their passports, which is vital for ended discrimination based on ethnicity. The change made it no longer legal to ask for ethnical identity during job interviews, and the employer no longer had a chance to determine an applicant’s nationality. Before the change, it was legal to make being Russian one of the criteria for employment.36 In other words, it was no longer legal to discriminate against ethnical minorities.
In summary, the short-term consequences of the collapse of the Soviet Union are self-explanatory. According to Stokes, by the end of the twentieth century, Russia could not be called a full-fledged democratic state.37 While the change of the regime to democracy granted all the freedoms and human rights, the enforcement of these rights was laggard. The reasons for such lags include a wide variety of social, economic, and political issues. First, the generation did change during the first decade, and people continued to think as communists. According to Cohen, 76% of USSR citizens voted for preserving the USSR, which means that people valued their way of life.38 The minds of people do not change overnight; therefore, more time was needed for people to start thinking as a civic society. Second, Russia suffered from a considerable financial crisis, which meant that there was not enough money to reinforce human rights.39 Third, there were no leaders interested in enforcing the Constitution since the elite was interested in becoming wealthier using privatization.40 In brief, short-term consequences were disastrous for human rights in Russia; however, the legal bases for future development were laid.
Long-Term Implication
Long-term implications of the collapse of the Soviet
Almost thirty years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the situation concerning human rights in Russia has changed considerably. According to Romanova, Russia has made significant progress in the field of human rights, and it continues Europeanization, even though the country’s leaders do not admit it.41 An evident breakthrough can be seen in education, which has become more democratized.42 Francesconi, Marco et al. argues that education reform and introduction of the unified state exam allowed more talented students to enter prestigious universities.43 The changes decreased corruption and made the requirements for entering higher education institutions more transparent.44 In healthcare, Russia was able to address the majority of problems posed by the collapse of the Soviet Union; however, the effectiveness of the measures was limited. According to Nazarov and Avxentyev, the Russian healthcare system underperforms in terms of mortality, life expectancy, and access to care.45 Healthcare workers are underpaid, there is no universal outpatient drug provision program, and there is a structural disproportion in health spending sources.46 However, in general, the situation with healthcare and education improved considerably.
While Russian citizens are granted freedom of religion, the government continues to control religious organizations limiting their activity. Russian society is believed to be conservative, and it accepts only traditional religions, including Eastern Orthodox Church and Islam.47 However, the government continuously tries to attack smaller religious groups, such as the International Society of Krishna Consciousness and Jehovah’s Witnesses.48 For instance, Jehovah’s Witnesses are considered an unlawful organization in Russia for unclear reasons.49 People are taken to jail and interrogated for practicing their religion, which demonstrates a low level of human rights in terms of faith.
At the same time, religion and conservatism negatively influence the rights of sexual minorities.50 Putin’s organization made a considerable step back from the fundamental freedoms granted after the collapse of the Soviet Union.51 In 2013, the State Duma of the Russian Federation passed the law prohibiting the propaganda of homosexuality among children and adolescents.52 The law is extensively used to suppress human rights movements fighting for the rights of LGBTQ.53 In short, the situation in the sphere has deteriorated in comparison with the first decade after the fall of the USSR.
Numerous studies report that human rights in Russia are consistently violated. Mantzaris reports high rates of corruption in Russia, which is used to promote legislation limiting the rights of unprotected populations, including children, elderly, and disabled people.54 Moreover, racism and ethnic conflicts are also a growing concern in the country.55 Freedom in the World 2019, an independent website about human right, reports that “with loyalist security forces, a subservient judiciary, a controlled media environment, and a legislature consisting of a ruling party and pliable opposition factions, the Kremlin is able to manipulate elections and suppress genuine dissent.”56 In summary, long-term implications for the collapse of the Soviet Union are not as optimistic as it was initially projected.
In summary, Putin’s administration is associated with a return to Soviet methods and authoritative power. The majority of human rights are still suppressed to maintain the authoritative control of the President. Even though there are positive changes in healthcare and education, freedom of speech, religion, and sexual identity are granted only on paper. Cohen argues that the fall of the USSR brought an end to the democratization of Russia, which was started by Gorbachev in the late 1980s.57 Russian citizens lost the feeling of security and confidence, and the trust of the government is slowly decreasing.58 Freedom in the World 2019 website declares that Russian is not free with an overall score of 20 out of 100.59 While economic stability is achieved, Putin’s administration continues to control the press and opposition through official and unofficial channels. In brief, the long-term results of the Soviet Union’s collapse in terms of human rights in Russia are poor.
Conclusion
The dissolution of the USSR came as a surprise to the majority of experts since there were no apparent political or economic prerequisites. The lack of provision of basic human rights was one of the major concerns that led to the historical event. The collapse of the regime was associated with legal provisions of all democratic freedoms. Even though there were significant limitations to the implementation of these freedoms, the long-term results of the event were expected to be positive. However, the analysis shows that Russia seems to turn back to Soviet methods of controlling the thought of citizens by oppression and limiting human rights. While on paper, Russian citizens are granted all the rights and freedoms, they are often violated for political reasons.
Works Cited
Antonov, Mikhail. “Religion, Sexual Minorities, and the Rule of Law in Russia.” Journal of Law, Religion and State, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 152–183.
Arnold, Richard. “Systematic Racist Violence in Russia between ‘Hate Crime’ and ‘Ethnic Conflict’.” Theoretical Criminology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 239-256.
Aron, Leon. “Everything You Think You Know about the Collapse of the Soviet Union Is Wrong.” Foreign Policy, vol. 20, 2011, pp. 1-7.
Benites, Kirsten. “Repatriation of Ethnic Groups.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, pp. 89-97. Web.
Bonneville, Ken. “Civil Society and Human Rights.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, pp. 4-9. Web.
Cohen, Steven. “The Breakup of the Soviet Union Ended Russia’s March to Democracy.”The Guardian. 2006, Web.
Danton, Christine. “The Health Crisis in Russia.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, pp. 42-50. Web.
Francesconi, Marco et al. “Democratizing Access to Higher Education in Russia: The Consequences of the Unified State Exam Reform.” European Economic Review, vol. 117, pp. 56-82
Freedom in the World. “Russia.” Freedom in the World 2019, Web.
Freese, Susan. “Human Trafficking.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, pp. 61-71. Web.
Goble, Paul. “Federalism and Human Rights in the Soviet Union.” Cornell International Law Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, 1990, pp. 399-404.
Johnson, Annika. “Disability Rights.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, pp. 10-21. Web.
Kenez, Peter. A History of the Soviet Union from the Beginning to the End. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Kortunov, V. et al. “Homosexuality in Russia: Are There Reasons to Be Homophobic Today?” Social Sciences and Arts, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 517-528.
Mantzaris, E.A. “Corruption as a Violation of Basic Human Rights in South Africa and Russia.” African Journal of Public Affairs, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 15-30.
Knight, Amy. “The KGB, perestroika, and the collapse of the Soviet Union.” Journal of Cold War Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, 2003, pp. 67-93.
L, Vladimir. “Human Rights and How They are Applied in Post-Soviet Societies.” Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs vol. 5, no. 4, 2017, pp. 1-4.
Leinsalu, Mall et al. “Increasing Ethnic Differences in Mortality in Estonia after the Collapse of the Soviet Union.” Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, vol. 58, no. 7, 2004, pp. 583-589.
Libby, Kristina. “Ethnic Conflict.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, pp. 22-29. Web.
Marples, David. The Collapse of the Soviet Union, 1985-1991. Routledge, 2016.
Nazarov, Vladimir and Nikolay Avxentyev. “Healthcare in Russia: Problems and Perspectives.” Financial Journal, no. 4, pp 9-23.
Nowakowski, Arianna. “Introduction.”Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, pp. 1-3. Web.
Romanova, Tatiana. “Europeanisation and Russia.” The European Union and Its Eastern Neighbourhood edited by Paul Flenley and Michael Mannin, Manchester University Press, 2018.
Petrovsky, Vladimir. “Human Development and Human Security in Eurasia.” International Journal on World Peace vol. 22, no. 4, 2005, 17-75.
Samarin, Melissa. “Persecution Against Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia Escalates.”Human Rights Watch. 2019, Web.
Simão, Licínia. “(In)Security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies.” E-Cadernos CES vol. 19, 2013, pp. 132-152.
Smith, Cathy. “Violations of Human Rights in the Russian Military.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, pp. 51-60. Web.
Stokes, Nick. “Prospects for Democracy.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, pp. 72-81. Web.
Swift, Amy. “Political Repressions of Islam.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, pp. 82-88. Web.
“The Constitution of the Russian Federation.”Constitution.ru, Web.
Weilminster, Lisa. “Gender and Human Rights.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, pp. 30-41. Web.
Footnotes
1 Petrovsky, Vladimir. “Human Development and Human Security in Eurasia,” International Journal on World Peace 22, no. 4 (2005): 18.
2 Simão, Licínia. “(In)Security in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Contributions from Critical Security Studies,” E-Cadernos CES 19, (2013): 133.
3 Leinsalu, Mall et al. “Increasing Ethnic Differences in Mortality in Estonia after the Collapse of the Soviet Union,” Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 58, no. 7 (2004): 583-589
4 Goble, Paul, “Federalism and Human Rights in the Soviet Union,” Cornell International Law Journal 23, no. 2 (1990): 401.
5 L, Vladimir, “Human Rights and How They are Applied in Post-Soviet Societies,” Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs 5, no. 4 (2017): 1.
6 L 2.
7 Marples, David, The Collapse of the Soviet Union, 1985-1991 (Routledge) 32.
8 Marples 32.
9 Kenez, Peter. A History of the Soviet Union from the Beginning to the End (Cambridge University Press) 15.
10 Kenez 24.
11 Kenez 4.
12 Marples 37.
13 Aron, Leon. “Everything You Think You Know About the Collapse of the Soviet Union Is Wrong,” Foreign Policy, vol. 20, 2011, p. 2.
14 Aron 3.
15 Aron 4.
16 Knight, Amy. “The KGB, perestroika, and the collapse of the Soviet Union.” Journal of Cold War Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, 2003, p. 79.
17 Knight 80.
18 Knight 72.
19 Cohen, Steven. “The Breakup of the Soviet Union Ended Russia’s March to Democracy.” The Guardian, 13 Dec. 2006.
20 Cohen.
21 Nowakowski, Arianna. “Introduction.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, p. 1.
22 “The Constitution of the Russian Federation.” Constitution.ru.
23 Bonneville, Ken. “Civil Society and Human Rights.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, p. 4.
24 Bonneville 4.
25 Swift, Amy. “Political Repressions of Islam.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, p. 72.
26 Bonneville 4.
27 Danton, Christine. “The Health Crisis in Russia.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, p. 42.
28 Johnson, Annika. “Disability Rights.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, p. 10.
29 Libby, Kristina. “Ethnic Conflict.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, p. 22.
30 Smith, Cathy. “Violations of Human Rights in the Russian Military.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, p. 51
31 Freese, Susan. “Human Trafficking.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, p. 61.
32 Weilminster, Lisa. “Gender and Human Rights.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, p. 30
33 Weilminster 30
34 “The Constitution of the Russian Federation.”
35 Bonneville 4.
36 Goble 401.
37 Stokes, Nick. “Prospects for Democracy.” Human Rights in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 2007, p. 72.
38 Cohen.
39 Nowakowski 1.
40 Cohen.
41 Romanova, Tatiana. “Europeanisation and Russia.” The European Union and Its Eastern Neighbourhood edited by Paul Flenley and Michael Mannin, Manchester University Press, 2018
42 Francesconi, Marco et al. “Democratizing Access to Higher Education in Russia: The Consequences of the Unified State Exam Reform.” European Economic Review, vol. 117, pp. 56.
43 Francesconi et al. 58.
44 Francesconi et al. 59.
45 Nazarov, Vladimir, and Nikolay Avxentyev. “Healthcare in Russia: Problems and Perspectives.” Financial Journal, no. 4, p 10.
46 Nazarov 9.
47 Antonov, Mikhail. “Religion, Sexual Minorities, and the Rule of Law in Russia.” Journal of Law, Religion and State, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 153.
48 Bonneville 4.
49 Samarin, Melissa. “Persecution against Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia Escalates.” Human Rights Watch, 29 Oct. 2019.
50 Antonov 153.
51 Kortunov, V. et al. “Homosexuality in Russia: Are There Reasons to Be Homophobic Today?” Social Sciences and Arts, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 517.
52 Kortunov 517.
53 Kortunov 520.
54 Mantzaris, E.A. “Corruption as a Violation of Basic Human Rights in South Africa and Russia.” African Journal of Public Affairs, vol. 9, no. 8, p. 15.
55 Arnold, Richard. “Systematic Racist Violence in Russia between ‘Hate Crime’ and ‘Ethnic Conflict’.” Theoretical Criminology, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 240.
56 Freedom in the World. “Russia.” Freedom in the World 2019.
57 Cohen.
58 Cohen.
59 Freedom in the World.