Hypothesis Testing and Variance Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda®
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

Abstract

The intrinsic job satisfaction of both males and females has no difference as the t value of their average means 0.064 and has a p-value of 0.949 which is greater than 0.05. However, there is a difference in Extrinsic Satisfaction by Position since the p-value is less than 0.05 and the t value is greater than t critical.

Introduction

Hypothesis testing is a decision-making process where a certain claim on a population is evaluated. In hypothesis testing, the population is defined as a certain claim made about the population. In hypothesis testing, a significance level is determined, a sample taken, then data relating to the sample are collected and calculations are made for testing. The result of the calculation is a conclusion. Hypothesis testing involves the creation of a null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis. It involves parameters such as standard deviation, means, and proportions. We have several tests such as T-test, Z-test, F-test, and Chi-test (Bowerman, O’Connell, Orris, and Murphree, 2010).

In this case, the hypothesis will help to predict the expected relationship between Extrinsic Satisfaction and Position as well as intrinsic job satisfaction and gender. We will use the provided population value based on the data collected from the sample.

Hypothesis Test #1: Looking at Intrinsic Satisfaction by Gender

The question: Is there a significant difference in the Intrinsic Satisfaction for male and females?

The null and alternate hypothesis

Ho: µ12

Ha: the means are not equal

The Significance level is 95% i.e. α = 0.05

Using the test statistic: Reject H0 if t < -1.997 or if t > +1.997 one tailed

Using p-value: Reject H0 if p-value < 0.05

The test

FemaleMale
Mean5.1807695.18913
Variance0.0968150.614768
Observations2646
Hypothesized Mean Difference0
df65
t Stat-0.06396
P(T<=t) one-tail0.474598
t Critical one-tail1.668636
P(T<=t) two-tail0.949197
t Critical two-tail1.997138

The value of the Test Statistic is -0.064

The P-value is 0.949

P-value < 0.001

Intrinsic Satisfaction by Gender

Decision

Decision (If P ≤ α, reject Ho; otherwise do not reject Ho) accepts, Ho: µ12 as P-value is greater than the selected significance level (0.05) and concludes the level satisfaction is equal for all genders. It has been found that there is no considerable difference in the intrinsic job satisfaction for both male and female.

Explanation of decision made

A significant level, α=0.05 it can be noted that -1.997<-0.064>1.997, therefore, the null hypothesis can be accepted and an alternative hypothesis can be rejected which states that there is no significant difference between the intrinsic job satisfaction of both males and females.

Applications for managers

The managers of the company can use this information to treat both male and female equally as there is a difference in their job satisfaction.

Hypothesis Test #2 Looking at Extrinsic Satisfaction by Position

H0: There is no significant difference between the means of both Salaried Employee and Hourly Employee.

Ho: µ1≠µ2

Ha: There is a significant difference between the means of both Salaried Employee and Hourly Employee.

Ha: µ1≠µ2.

The Significance level is 95% i.e. α = 0.05.

The test

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances

Salaried EmployeeHourly Employee
Mean5.6085.361702
Variance0.10660.208067
Observations2547
Hypothesized Mean Difference0
df64
t Stat2.641964991
P(T<=t) one-tail0.005174427
t Critical one-tail1.669013026
P(T<=t) two-tail0.010348855
t Critical two-tail1.997729633

The critical value is 1.998, the value of test statistic is t = 2.642 and the P-value is = 0.010.

Decision

Decision (If P ≤ α, reject H0; otherwise do not reject H0). Do reject Ho: µ12, as P-value (0.010) is less than the selected significance level (0.05) and conclude Ho: µ12.

Explanation of decision made

Given that the p-value to be 0.010 and t calculated of 2.64, one will state that from the sample there is any evidence to suggest that Extrinsic Satisfaction for Salaried Employee and Hourly Employee is not the same.

Applications for managers

The manager can use this information to decide motivating factors for employees who are salaried and those on Hourly rates.

Z and T-Tests

The t distribution is similar to the z distribution in the following ways:

  1. It is bell-shaped;
  2. It is symmetric about the mean;
  3. The mean, median and mode are equal to zero and are located at the center of the distribution;
  4. The curve never touches the x-axis.

The t distribution differs from the Z distribution in the following ways:

  1. The variance is greater than 1;
  2. The t distribution is a family of curves based on the degrees of freedom, which is a number related to sample size;
  3. When the sample size increases, the t value nears z value. When the sample size is 30 or more, statisticians generally agree that the two distributions can be considered identical, since the difference between their values is relatively small.

Samples and Populations

A sample is a small part of the population that will be used in carrying out an analysis to estimate the characteristic of the population. A population is an entire group that the study targets to understand their characteristics (Healy, 2009).

Conclusion

Statistics and researches are vital as they are used to validate the hypothesis and conclusions. In this case, the statistical study reveals that there is strong evidence, which reflects the significant difference in the Extrinsic Satisfaction of both Salaried Employee and Hourly Employee. It reveals that there is no significant difference in intrinsic job satisfaction for both males and females.

References

Babbie, E. R. (2009). The basics of Social Research. Belmont: Cengage Learning.

Bowerman, B. L., O’Connell, R. T., Orris, J. B., & Murphree, E. S. (2010). Essential of Business Statistics. New York: McGraw Hill Irwin.

Healy, J. F. (2009). Statics: A Tool for Social Research. Belmont: Cengage Learning.

Print
More related papers
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2020, August 28). Hypothesis Testing and Variance. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hypothesis-testing-and-variance/

Work Cited

"Hypothesis Testing and Variance." IvyPanda, 28 Aug. 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/hypothesis-testing-and-variance/.

References

IvyPanda. (2020) 'Hypothesis Testing and Variance'. 28 August.

References

IvyPanda. 2020. "Hypothesis Testing and Variance." August 28, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hypothesis-testing-and-variance/.

1. IvyPanda. "Hypothesis Testing and Variance." August 28, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hypothesis-testing-and-variance/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Hypothesis Testing and Variance." August 28, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/hypothesis-testing-and-variance/.

Powered by CiteTotal, easy bibliography tool
If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
Cite
Print
1 / 1