Introduction
The article in questions dwells upon intellectual property protection. The author provides a brief analysis of major ways to protect intellectual property. The author claims that different countries have a variety of laws aimed at the protection of intellectual property.
Kotabe (2010) also argues that the contemporary business world requires global laws that could protect the intellectual property of companies operating in different countries. The author also highlights several global regulations which are being introduced. The author focuses on e-commerce and claims that it is very difficult to ensure the protection of intellectual property due to advances in information technologies. Kotabe (2010) notes that any electronic data are potentially vulnerable.
Strengths of the Article
It is necessary to state that the issues concerning intellectual property in e-business have been discussed for decades. Melvin (2011) also highlights existing ways to protect intellectual property and stresses the need to introduce global laws which could be applicable in all cases.
Kotabe (2010) provides meaningful arguments to support his statement. First, the author analyses such types of intellectual property protection as patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets. The author also mentions several treaties and conventions concerning international treaties for intellectual property protection. Remarkably, the author includes a variety of specific examples from real life. He mentions particular cases concerning intellectual property protection.
This makes the article more specific and reliable. The author does not simply reveal his viewpoint on the matter but provides specific pieces of evidence. This is one of the strengths of the article. It is also important to note that the author uses simple language along with the necessary terms.
The outline of the article is also very clear. Subtitles help the reader to easily follow the author. This makes the article suitable for a very wide audience. The article is recent, and it is located in a scholarly journal, which makes it a valuable source of information.
Limitations
Nonetheless, the article also has certain limitations. Even though Kotabe (2010) mentions some treaties and conventions which can help multinationals operate globally, it seems insufficient. The author claims that the article touches upon certain limitations in the field. However, these limitations are too general. It is obvious that intellectual property protection laws are different in different countries, and this is one of the limitations.
The author also mentions that in the process of creation, countries try to ensure more possibilities for companies located within their boundaries. Again, this is too general. The author does not provide sufficient examples to prove his point. This part of the article needs specific examples to form real life, which could speak louder than words.
Conclusion
On balance, it is possible to note that the article in question is a valuable source of information for research concerning intellectual property protection. The author provides a brief analysis of existing types of protection of intellectual law in some countries as well as globally.
The author claims that the contemporary globalized world needs new regulations as companies are vulnerable due to the potential accessibility of data. However, there are certain limitations to this article. For instance, it is necessary to provide examples of flaws of existing international laws for intellectual property protection. It is also possible to provide a certain methodology which could help develop effective regulations and laws.
Reference List
Kotabe, M. (2010). Evolving intellectual property protection in the world: Promises and limitations. UPR Business Journal, 1(1), 1-16.
Melvin, S. P. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.