Introduction
The Bullitt country has made a state citation that all employees should ultimately follow within an organization, specifically the Jim Beam bourbon plant. The managers and the plant stakeholders’ key role is that they are at the forefront of administering that the country’s federal labor laws are followed to the letter regarding the break policy. After realizing that the company was violating the state’s laws, the firm changed the policy after concluding that the employees were taking advantage of the liberal break policy. The organization also stated that they consulted with the urologist to give the best policy reasonable to the employees as the old policies are degrading the company (Gottwald & Braun, 2019). Consequently, the company’s key organizational issues are to write a concrete memo to the cabinet, explaining clearly, why they changed the policies before the next hearing scheduled for next week.
Integrating the Specific Theory
Under this case study, the Jim Beam bourbon plant operates under a closed system. This is because, in a closed system, the organization is separated from the external environment. There is no interaction outside the organization which helps build knowledge from other organizations that could produce better growth (Schach et al., 2018). The company workers cannot change the organization’s policies, and they end up being degraded and embarrassed. In the Jim Beam bourbon case, more than 45 workers have been disciplined and lost their jobs (Gottwald & Braun, 2019). However, this has subjected other employees to begin wearing protective undergarments to avoid leaving the company’s line, or otherwise, they lose their jobs. It is so unhealthy and unethical that some employees have urinated on themselves for fear (Gottwald & Braun, 2019). The Jim Beam bourbon operates under a production line that sets a good example for a closed system.
The rational model is a specific theory that helps understand the specific behaviors through rational thinking and the decision-making process. The Jim Beam bourbon plant has set its intuitive implication on the workers’ welfare and realized that there is a need to change the closed system structure of the organization and integrate a rational model (Merida, 2015). In a close reading in this case study, some of the company’s staff members have revolted, and they are holding the company’s ground that the old policies from the federal labor laws are degrading. The company owes that they will not keep quiet and become miserable as they watch their employees being punished. Uzonwanne (2016) elucidates that “through the rational choice model, the theory focuses on the decisions of individual choices that result in the employees making their individual decisions” (p. 3). The individual decisions make the employee become motivated and, hence, productive.
The rational model requires unhurried, analytical, and logical decisions which prompt decision-makers to access the long-term effects of their decisions based on facts and task-oriented decision-making. According to Koechlin (2020), “the rational style relates to initiating the structure and the intragroup control orientation linked with higher company performance” and ensures a positive growth of the plant (p. 6). It guides how people engage in decision-making from a critical point of view.
Personal Reflection
For better growth and higher performance within the plant, the company should incorporate open systems structure that helps both employees and employers to a collaborative environment through definite communication, which can encourage the exchange of ideas. Mann (2018) explains that the “feedback the managers receive from their workers will help determine the appropriate management system that the managers will take to help better the company” (p. 88). Most importantly, Estevez (2020) suggests that “the open system theory originated from the natural sciences and replicates that in an open system” (p. 3). The organization considers the inputs from the environment, transforms the inputs into output, and then releases them to the environment or the society in which it operates.
Furthermore, there is a natural laws theory with intrinsic values that govern the respective behavior and reasoning. According to Estevez (2020), “the natural laws maintain that the concept of doing right and wrong is inherent to the people and are not made by court judges or society. Therefore, there should be a negotiation for any wrong did” (p. 4).
According to Zaffalon and Miranda (2018), Christian and religious views explain, “what is behind the universe is more like a mind than anything else we know… it is conscious and prefers to do one thing to another,” and therefore, no one has control over nature (p. 30). In biblical teaching, the act of doing what is right or wrong is reflected in individual virtues and moral obligations (The Bible. 1998). This reflects the value of natural law that justice how human beings behave and make fair decisions.
Conclusion
To sum up, it is the company’s responsibility to provide good working employment for all the workers and respect one’s rights and freedom. The policies should not undermine them and the free environment will help give higher output through good performance. The natural law theory is inherent in people and that they should do one activity at a time and should not be limited in any way because nature predicts the environment. The open system is well-suited for a good-performing company that yields high output since the employees are motivated by the working environment.
References
Estevez, E. (2020). Natural Law. Investopedia. Web.
Gottwald, S., & Braun, D. A. (2019). Bounded rational decision-making from elementary computations that reduce uncertainty.Entropy, 21(4), 375. Web.
Koechlin, E. (2020). Human decision-making beyond the rational decision theory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 4-6. Web.
Mann, R. P. (2018). Collective decision making by rational individuals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(44), 87-96. Web.
Merida, T. (2015). Christ-centered exposition: Exalting Jesus in 1 & 2 Kings. B & H Publishing Group.
Schach, S., Gottwald, S., & Braun, D. A. (2018). Quantifying motor task performance by bounded rational decision theory.Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12(932). Web.
The Bible. (1998). Authorized King James Version, Oxford UP.
Uzonwanne, F. (2016). Rational model of decision making. In book: Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp.1-6). Web.
Zaffalon, M., & Miranda, E. (2018). Desirability foundations of robust rational decision making. Synthese, 1-42. Web.