Introduction
The assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy was a tragedy not only for the citizens of America but also for the world. The 35th president of the United States had strong moral values and tried to build a better future for all of us. His death raised many questions, one of which is the organization of a complex operation such as the tragic event in question. In my opinion, it is possible to orchestrate an assassination without spreading the word of the real masterminds.
Main body
Usually, the larger the number of people who know about something, the more likely it is that the information will leak. The number of people needed to kill a person varies depending on many factors. However, the general rule that applies not only to assassinations but also to all controlled information is ‘the fewer people know about it, the better.’ The preparation of Kennedy’s assassination appears to have been a complicated task that required a large number of people, including several gun teams. The fact that there is still no certainty about the people who organized the killing speaks to the fact that leakage was avoided despite a large number of people involved.
People may reveal information out of fear or remorse. To eliminate the first possibility, masterminds usually create a greater fear. For instance, if a person knows that his family or friends will die if they say something, they will be more likely to keep silent. This might have been the case here, but given the number of participants, it would have been challenging to blackmail all of them. A lack of remorse is a more likely scenario as one can find many people who do not agree with the president. If a person is certain that what they did was right, then they would have no reason to put themselves in danger or go to prison. Thus, people who participated in Kennedy’s assassination may have been ideologically strong and not inclined to reveal any information about the true masterminds.
In addition, the elimination of such a high-profile target as John Kennedy without information leakage may have been possible due to a lack of knowledge of any significant information among the participants. The principle of information concealment discussed above is highly likely to have been used in this case. Despite the number of people who may have participated in the organization, there was no need for them to know anything about the members of the plot against Kennedy. One of the many strategies was possibly the use of aliases and pawns who ordered professionals to shoot Kennedy. The same nameless people could have ordered guns, by which Kennedy was supposedly shot.
Anyone could have driven the people who shot Kennedy to the place where he was murdered. All that those people had to know was where to go. As long as the necessary amount of precaution was made—and the facts show that they were made—none of the participants had anything relevant to tell the investigators. Even if some of them (for instance, a van driver who drove the assassins to the site) wanted to tell the investigators that he had done so, it offers nothing about the real conspirators.
Conclusion
All things considered, there are a number of ways real killers could escape, with their identities left unknown. Fear, remorse, or lack of information are possible reasons that it is still unclear who killed Kennedy. Even such an intricate operation as the assassination of a president could be orchestrated, provided the right organizational approach is used.