Principle #1 – Evolution
“Typically, journalists, reporters, anchors, and editors are required to have accounts at these sites for use as part of their reporting duties, from sharing work to finding sources for stories” (Campbell et al. 60). Attempting to understand what the emergence of online networking platforms implies for reporting and reporters has become arguably the thriving topic of inquiry among people who take journalism. This is due to the rise in popularity of developing a thorough social media position and approach among news companies of all stripes in the last several years, from county publications to TV broadcasters. The film argues that to uncover the genuine essence of journalism, one should continually engage in the everyday activity of disseminating accurate information to society.
Page One amortizes its content with pieces concerning internet media, cable television, and the choice made by media companies to reduce their spending on televised coverage rather than the newspaper industry in general. I noted much of WikiLeaks’ capability to reveal a story on YouTube even without the assistance of a news outlet, as well as reporter Brian Stelter’s transition from independent blogging to desired Times staff member. I sternly noticed the majestic and sentimental tone of the introductory visuals of the Times publishing facility, which are painstakingly crafted and vividly colored, making room for the fuzz of online videos. The underlying facts regarding the nationwide insolvency of newspapers are presented through a patchwork of televised stories, which were chosen with a predilection for the amateurish.
Principle #2 – Dedication
“Although reporters have traditionally thought of themselves primarily as observers and recorders, some journalists have acknowledged a social responsibility” (Campbell et al. 96). The filmmakers mention the dangers and difficulties the newspaper faces in the early half of the film. They also admit some of the harm the Times has brought to its credibility, such as Judith Miller’s infamous stories regarding Iraq’s WMDs.
The producers then make their case for the Times’ continued relevance later. When foresightful Bruce Headlam and his writers reject the notion that the war in Iraq has finished, they demonstrate a behind-the-scenes journalistic choice. They also occasionally use Carr as the newspaper’s most vociferous defender. Thus, a redemption story for David Carr and The New York Times is created by the organization and informative framework of Page One. I do not mean to mock anyone when I say that. Only those unusually stagnant, the kind of people the Sulzbergers’ distant relatives used to refer to as all-rights, cannot acknowledge the necessity of rescue efforts. Only the condescending individuals who have hardly ever battled to get the story right on a time limit can assume the planet would be a more favorable place if the Times were to vanish. The rearranged truth of Page One can be appreciated and respected by the rest of us.
Principle #3 – Excellence
To answer the issue of what will transpire if the swift reality of media slips on the truth, actual journalism that characterizes and represents our community should receive the top most attention. Despite other newspapers gathering significant losses due to the internet, the New York Times has ceaselessly maintained its production, and this is facilitated by the impeccable work of the journalists seeking the truth no matter the cost. This clearly shows how excellence in their reporting gave them the top position relating to journalism, hence receiving the recognition they do from society and worldwide. Therefore, the New York Times will continue thriving in the competitive media environment due to excellence in their work, with the aim of only facts and truths.
Work Cited
Campbell, Richard, et al. “Chapter 3: Newspapers to Digital Frontiers: Journalism’s Journey.” Media Essentials: A Brief Introduction, Fifth ed., Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2020, pp. 57–96. Web.