The author of this article expresses the views of such a well-known philosopher as Karl Marx. The researcher begins with the description of the time Karl Marx lived, which was in the 19th century. The 19th century is known as a period when capitalism was the main issue of discussion in the field of economy. According to the narrator, Karl Marx had a specific definition of human nature. In the article, the author explores Karl Marx’s concerns on the impacts of social class on human nature. He expounds on how social class could contribute immensely to depriving an individual’s human nature.
The author of the article further advances on how many people viewed Karl Marx. For instance, the narrator describes the philosopher as an original thinker loaded with the wrong ideas. The views of Karl Marx were greatly influenced by his support of communism. Many people link communism with wrong predictions of the future, hence disapproving Karl Marx’s philosophy.
However, in the article, the narrator points out how Karl Marx contributed positively to the society, based on the belief that he concerned about the involvement of both the social and the economic factors in shaping an individual. According to Karl Marx, a supportive society has great influence on the well-being of a person.
In the article, the author further focuses on how alienation contributed to the altering of human nature based on Karl Marx’s ideas. According to him, alienation is a condition when a person loses connection with the society, which results in one being incompetent in some situations. For instance, the loss of supportive social environment greatly hampers with the standards of an individual due to development of the feeling of inferiority within an individual in the society. Karl Marx also argued that differences between consumers and producers could result in denaturing of human nature. In addition he argued that most consumers depended on producers for survival, which resulted in a negative effect on the producer. He also blamed the producers of their overworking acts that contributed to the loss of balance in the society.
According to Karl Marx, the existence of imbalance between the producers and consumers was also present in working environments affecting both the employers and the employees. He also claimed that the employers depended on their employees in satisfying their daily demands disregarding human nature. According to Karl Marx, exploitation was another form of alienation because it freed capitalists from proletariats.
Karl Marx further argued that to achieve a balanced life, the product of the producer should be fully paid. He defined product as the sum of the used raw materials with labor inputted by the producer. For instance, Karl Marx argued that an independent worker had the potential of enjoying a balanced life due to observance of both the process of production as part of his/her property. On the other hand, he concluded that employed workers had different views of their lives because of their negative perception of the activities they had done under the control of their employers. In the article, equitability is further explained as the only element that could do away with the alienation in societies.
The author concludes by expounding the argument made by Karl Marx concerning division of labor. According to the philosopher, specializations in different fields immensely contributed to bridging the gap between the different social classes. Individuals needed to have specific skills to create an appropriate atmosphere convenient for all the people. He further argued that equity in earnings would greatly contribute to filling the psychological differences among the people.