King ‘s “Letter From Birmingham Jail” and Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Letter From Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King and Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau were written in 1963 and 1849 accordingly. The premises of these writing are slightly different: King’s letter was an answer to his illegal imprisonment for conducting non-violent protest aimed at drawing public attention to the issue of racial segregation among Birmingham’s city officials while Thoreau’s essay was written as an opposition to slavery and the Mexican-American War. Despite this fact, both King and Thoreau had a common goal to expose the unjust laws that govern a society of civil resistance to unjust laws

It should be stressed that both King and Thoreau opposed the existing forms of governments, condemning the unjust, immoral laws that suppress people’s freedom, trying to implement their ideas in life through calling for civil resistance and non-violent means of struggle. United by the similar idea, both authors approached it differently resorting to various techniques while claiming civil resistance.

Both authors called for changes in the society that would foster justice and morality in it. However, Thoreau was intending to stand his point of view, to express his beliefs towards justice, while King provides a direct attack and severe opposition towards the clergymen structuring his letter so that refutes any their false statements, allegedly, based on moral and just laws. However, Thoreau states that only by civil disobedience and resistance, by overthrowing a government people could establish moral and ethical norms while King focuses on unjust actions of government and church towards black people persuasively explaining the fallacies of the existing system of laws. Moreover, Thoreau concentrates on actions that should be done to fight unjust laws, while King focuses on the underlying reasons that make a law immoral and unjust.

It should be pointed out that Thoreau’s and King’s views on citizens’ positions in the fight for justice are similar. Both authors emphasized the necessity of non-violent civil actions against unethical laws. Thoreau stated that it is people’s duty and obligation to claim for their rights and resist governmental inefficiency by acts of total civil disobedience. One of the ways, Thoreau offers is refusing to pay taxes to the government.

Similar to Thoreau, King is convinced that people should not resort to violent actions. But addressing clergymen, he stresses that suppressed Afro Americans would have no choice but to act violently against the injustice towards them. According to King, the only way to reduce the tensions between suppressed citizens and government is through non-violent protests and boycotts that would draw attention to a burning problem in society.

Despite both Thoreau and King, call for non-violent actions, they express their viewpoints differently. King makes use of a persuasive, gentle tone concentrating on the non-violent solution of confrontation as opposed to Thoreau being aggressive and assertive in expressing his beliefs in rejection of unjust government. Another difference between these two writings is the authors’ views towards the position of group and individual within society. While Thoreau lays emphasis on the importance of the results of civil oppression for an individual, King views improvements in the law system that would be beneficial for a group rather than an individual.

The approach towards obeying the law is also different in the writings in question. While King accepts going to jail intending to draw a wide response in the society towards the injustice of government, Thoreau appeals to people to act and stand for their principles and rights without any procrastination.

All things considered, it should be stressed that both Thoreau and King were passionate advocates of justice and morality in society and though different in some points, they both made a great contribution to the improvement of society.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, December 23). King 's “Letter From Birmingham Jail” and Thoreau's “Civil Disobedience”. https://ivypanda.com/essays/king-s-letter-from-birmingham-jail-and-thoreaus-civil-disobedience/

Work Cited

"King 's “Letter From Birmingham Jail” and Thoreau's “Civil Disobedience”." IvyPanda, 23 Dec. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/king-s-letter-from-birmingham-jail-and-thoreaus-civil-disobedience/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'King 's “Letter From Birmingham Jail” and Thoreau's “Civil Disobedience”'. 23 December.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "King 's “Letter From Birmingham Jail” and Thoreau's “Civil Disobedience”." December 23, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/king-s-letter-from-birmingham-jail-and-thoreaus-civil-disobedience/.

1. IvyPanda. "King 's “Letter From Birmingham Jail” and Thoreau's “Civil Disobedience”." December 23, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/king-s-letter-from-birmingham-jail-and-thoreaus-civil-disobedience/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "King 's “Letter From Birmingham Jail” and Thoreau's “Civil Disobedience”." December 23, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/king-s-letter-from-birmingham-jail-and-thoreaus-civil-disobedience/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1