Law Case Study: Dismissing First and Second Counts Case Study

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

This matter is before the Superior Court of Arizona led by Defendants Hanna N. Porch and the Law Offices of Hanna N. Porch (“Porch Defendants”) to dismiss Michelle Berry’s first and second counts. The Porch Defendant presume that the Counts on Fraud based on misrepresentation and Breach of warranty should be granted a relief due to Rule 44-2004(B) of Arizona Revised Statutes.

The request is supported by diverse Statutes of Limitations in Arizona securities cases. The duration of most statutes regarding fraud in purchase or sale securities is generally one to two years long. For example, the charge can be dismissed unless it is placed within two years after the discovery of the fraud (Mitchell). The plaintiff, Michelle Barry, recognized the fraudulent actions in June 2019; however, the case was brought to court only in November 2021. Additionally, the statute of limitations for the claim of fraud based on misrepresentation is a two-year statute defined in A.R.S. Sec. 12-542 (Mitchell). Therefore, the charges on the first count should be receded immediately due to the extension of its Statute of Limitations.

The second count is inadmissible for bringing accusations on the breach of warranty as well. Firstly, no solid evidence can be presented as the warranty was not mentioned in the signed contract. Oral unrecorded, and therefore doubtful, discussions cannot be considered appropriate evidence, as well as proof of guilt. In addition, the request to decline the second count is supported by the statute of limitations in terms of the breach of an oral contract. The right to prefer charges on the breach of oral contract is allowed within 3 years based on the relevant statute shown in A.R.S. Sec 12-543 (Mitchell). Hence, the plaintiff is no more eligible to press charges against the defendant on that issue; therefore, the count should be declined due to the expiration of the statute of limitations period.

Work Cited

Mitchell, R. D. (n. d.). Statutes of Limitation in Arizona securities cases. Robert D. Mitchell: Effective Solutions for Complex Financial Disputes. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, December 17). Law Case Study: Dismissing First and Second Counts. https://ivypanda.com/essays/law-case-study-dismissing-first-and-second-counts/

Work Cited

"Law Case Study: Dismissing First and Second Counts." IvyPanda, 17 Dec. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/law-case-study-dismissing-first-and-second-counts/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Law Case Study: Dismissing First and Second Counts'. 17 December.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Law Case Study: Dismissing First and Second Counts." December 17, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/law-case-study-dismissing-first-and-second-counts/.

1. IvyPanda. "Law Case Study: Dismissing First and Second Counts." December 17, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/law-case-study-dismissing-first-and-second-counts/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Law Case Study: Dismissing First and Second Counts." December 17, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/law-case-study-dismissing-first-and-second-counts/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1