Introduction
This paper evaluates the idea of leadership, the practice, and manipulation on individual motivation within corporations. Leadership entails employment of facts and skills to sway a group to accomplish certain defined objectives. A leader is responsible for direction of an organization in an effective and efficient manner (Doohan 200, p. 3).
Motivation concerns personal or collective spirit or urge to dedicated service. There are varied leadership impacts on employee motivation; this usually follows a need-satisfaction profile that may be unique in organizations (Hoffmann 2007, pg. 3). Organization’s culture follows the principle that both the person and association manipulate one another’s behavior and life practices.
Each entity joins group with unique individual attributes, values, distinctiveness, and skills from other places. The boss should thus be keen to identify and motivate or reprimand practices that are or not suited for the performance of his organization (Griffin &Moorhead 2009, p.68). The most central factor here is that individuals do not labor alone; there are contacts from managers, co-workers, measures within the work setting, and transformations that may occur overtime.
Leadership and Motivation in Organizations
An investigation into the various leadership models and principles and their consequential stimuli on the motivation and attitudes of the workers or individuals in an organization is important. Leadership styles continue to adjust with the growing century age due to increased globalization and changes in trade conditions.
Committed leaders overlook predictions and fads and rather focus on evidence style to leadership. Since leadership deals with relating with other people, human conduct needs approaches that will make it conducive for association and comfort (Kouzes & Posner 2010, p. xix). There is consequently no leadership model based on fad that can ensure output and efficiency.
There are process theories that postulate initiation, redirection, and stoppage of worker impetus and conduct. These include “Universalist Assumption” that stipulates that personalities strive and are motivated to accomplish objectives they adore at individual levels. This may vary culturally and within different organizations (Hoffmann 2007, p. 7). “The Assumption of Content and Process” explains motivation according to things that attract and energizes employees.
Leadership and Motivation on Innovation
The ability of leadership to recognize presence of frontline staff exceptional in identification of novel approaches of doing activities leads to innovation. A motivational leader ought to be aware that everyone constantly adds fresh value and ideas to the organization.
Therefore, indulgence of management in stimulation and appreciation of employees’ efforts to “think outside the box” creates an innovative mood and constructive competition is enhanced (Jacobson, 2002). Employees in most companies become proud when their new ideas create a difference within their workplaces. However, poor leadership results in scarcity of motivational energy, making most employees feel ineffective and unable to transform “the system” (Jacobsen, 2002).
An effective headship should not overlook the likelihood of their workers being an unexploited goldmine of superior ideas. Through this, even the top management engages the minds of frontline workers, not alienating itself to an elitist position. Competitive innovation is stimulated through this process in any union.
In recognition that some followers might be highly proficient and ingenious, a leader ought not to feel threatened or insecure by engaging such minds (Crossan & Apaydin, 2009). Instead, participatory leadership, with inspiration to transform and reach managerial targets encourages innovation.
Innovation is largely viewed as a significant source of viable advantage in the increasingly transforming environment. Innovation competence is a very vital indicator of company performance ( Crossan & Apaydin, 2009). Leadership that recognizes that none has monopoly over good ideas results into motivation of followers thus amplified novelty and performance.
Leaders who are aggressive in eliciting dreams of their workers involve everyone in daily operations. This practice has an outstanding multiplier result on rapidity of any change process and worker dedication to those transformations. Leaders thus should cultivate attitude of openness, which makes employees engaged in novelty and organizational rejuvenation.
Methodology
This dissertation intends to appraise the consequence of various leadership approaches, practices, and behavior on employee motivation and culture. It again will analyze the variances that exist amid top Leaders and line or middle level managers. The research will rely chiefly on the existing leadership approaches and motivation theories.
Theoretical frameworks and information can be from secondary sources. These might comprise books, journals, articles, newspapers, and internet sources. Primary data sources may not be of help as this would be unrepresentative, time, cost, and labor rigorous. This methodology will aid methodical examination of hypothesized ideas about relationships in leadership, motivation, and organizational culture.
Common content theories like “the hierarchy of needs theory,” Frederick Herzberg’s “two factor motivation theory,” and “achievement motivation theory” all require analysis and scientific research in various organizations and leadership approaches used (Hoffmann 2007, p. 7). There should be a strong focus on the leaders’ understanding of the workers’ needs as these are influential motivators.
Analytical appraisal scheme will be applied for methodical evaluation of literature sources. This will aid to advance process quality and results. This may be accompanied with constraints such as inadequate representation of sources and many materials to analyze (Crossan & Apaydin, 2009). This course shall comprise facts compilation, analysis, fusion, and presentation. There will be identification of relevant papers, application of inherent facts to sample articles, and search of various databases using key words.
Both quantitative and expressive data analysis approaches will be employed. Since the research aims at presenting a complete synopsis and a theoretical, rather than experiential consolidation, descriptive analysis will be preferred. Overall, the method shall be systematic analysis. Systematic facts gathering measures, expressive and quantitative data scrutiny approaches will be used in the research.
Leaders Behavior and Personality with Organization Culture
Certain headship approaches as transformational leadership moulds both the influential and followers to strive collectively towards a target. Ideally, people tend to act as teams given room for participatory leadership, that is, when individuals grasp and practice similar planned visions and values (Ashkanasy, Wilderom & Peterson 2010, p 237).
A vision-led guidance helps to arouse organization’s activities and enhances collaboration and involvement of all persons. There is room for learning of new ideas and development of followers. Flourishing organizations identify with tough vision, values, and beliefs that stimulate transformation and unification towards common goals.
Weak leadership vision and beliefs destroy competitive and constructive organizational traditions (Ashkanasy, Wilderom & Peterson 2010, p 238). Organizations become distinct only through their leadership, which make each of them acquire unique culture. Caution is required to avoid leaders who stress on negative or deviant practices as this may harm organizations or societies.
Research question
The basis of leadership is to motivate individuals attain their potential in work environment. Culture may define values, vision, and principles of a leadership pattern. These affect managerial systems within organizations from the lowest line managers to the peak executives (Scott 2010, p. 68).
There exists a definite pattern of leadership culture in an organization, though specialization, knowledge, and roles may vary (Scott 2010, p. 62). Hence, how do different leadership systems motivate and influence followers, or manipulate organizational culture? The study question here thus may be the influence of different leadership styles on employee motivation and general organizational customs.
Conclusion
Leadership is the function of knowing oneself, adopting a well-communicated vision, developing confidence amid contemporaries, and initiating action to realize own capabilities. Motivation majorly is psychological and is the willingness of persons to undertake a process for gratifying their wants.
Organizational culture and individual performances are greatly influenced by leadership. Only well-motivated groups will strive accomplish organizational brilliance. There thus needs to be an active research and investigations on the notion of leadership and its consequences on employee performance. This will assist to fill gaps and advance management for better performances.
List of References
Ashkanasy, N. Wilderom, C. & Peterson, M. (2010), the Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate, California, CA, SAGE Publications, Inc.
Crossan, M. & Apaydin, M. (2009) A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.[Online] Wiley Online Library.
Doohan, L. (2007), Spiritual Leadership: The Quest for Integrity, New Jersey, Paulist press.
Griffin, R. & Moorhead, G. (2009), Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations, Ohio, OH, Cengage Learning.
Hoffmann, S. (2007), How Do Motivation and Leadership Affect the Corporate Culture of Multinational Firms? Norderstedt, GRIN Verlag.
Hoffmann, S. (2007), Classical Motivation Theories – Similarities and Differences Between Them, Norderstedt, GRIN Verlag.
Jacobson, D. (2002) The Link between Motivation and Innovation. The U.S. Army’s top leadership recently did a very smart thing: They listened to one of their enlisted men. [Online] GovLeaders.Org.
Kouzes, J. &Posner, B. (2010), The Truth about Leadership: The No-fads, Heart-of-the-Matter Facts You Need to Know, California, CA, John Wiley and Sons.
Scott, K. (2010), Transforming Leadership, New York, NY, Church Publishing, Inc.