In making moral decisions, truth becomes relative and what one considers morally right in a given situation might be morally wrong when viewed from another perspective in another situation. In the film Right or Wrong (Making Moral Decisions), each character is faced with a moral dilemma in making moral decisions. After the guard sees Harryâs friends vandalize Kastnerâs house, he is faced with moral dilemma of reporting Harry to police given the fact that he knows Harryâs father.
He thinks on whether to cover Harry on basis of his fatherâs relationship, or report him to the police on basis of duty; as a guard, he has the responsibility of reporting such cases. The guardâs decision to report Harry to the authorities suggests deontological ethics where âethics judges the morality of an action based on the action’s adherence to rulesâ (Salzmann 6). If I were the guard, I would report Harry to the police because my duties dictate that I do so.
Similarly, Harryâs mother has a decision to make; to hide or present Harry to the police officers; she chooses the latter. Before producing Harry to the police, she thinks whether to hide her beloved son, or produce the unbecoming son, who keeps gangs for friends. Her decision viz. to produce her son to the police officers suggests utilitarianism, where, âthe moral worth of an action is determined by its outcomeâ (Shaw 33).
Harryâs mother focuses on the outcome of her actions that, Harry would change his unbecoming behavior. If I were Harryâs mother, I would do exactly what she did. The important things should never be left at the mercy of the less important things. Hiding Harry would appear as an act of love, but the long-term outcome would be ushering Harry into hooliganism.
On the other side, Kastnerâs opinion to bring Harry to trial due to his failure to divulge information about his friends suggests the ethical theory of consequentialism. In Kastnerâs perspective, trying Harry would assist in curbing vandalism. According to Page, âthe consequences of one’s conduct; are the true basis for any judgment about the morality of that conductâ (54).
Therefore, the consequences of Kastnerâs actions validate the morality of his decision. It would have been ethical for Sergeant Kelly if he forced Harry to talk for his (Harry) own good. This suggests ethical altruism whereby, âindividuals have a moral obligation to help, serve, or benefit othersâ (Rand 61). Sergeant Kelly is morally obliged to help Harry by pushing him to name his friends. This would ultimately benefit Harry for he did not participate in vandalizing Kastnerâs building.
As the film closes, Barker asks Harry, âIs it right to hide a lawbreaker from justice?” (Right or Wrong? Making Moral Decisions). This question suggests the ethical theory of deontological ethics versus relativism. Deontological in the sense that, we should not hide criminals for the law requires otherwise, and relativism in the sense that, hiding oneâs friends even though they are criminals serves the purpose of true friendship.
The issue of âtrue friendshipâ is relative and it varies from one person to another. To Harry, it is morally right to hide his friends while to Barker, it is morally wrong to hide lawbreakers. If I were Harry, I would mention the names of my friends. The fact that I did not participate in the vandalism shows that I disapprove the behavior. I would use consequentialism theory to defend my stand. By mentioning my friends to the police implies they will be charged for their behavior thus forcing them to change. Therefore, the results/consequences of my decision will be morally upright and this underscores the ethical theory of consequentialism.
Works Cited
Right or Wrong? (Making Moral Decisions). Coronet Instructional Films, 1954. Web.
Page, James. Peace Education: Exploring Ethical and Philosophical Foundations. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, 2008.
Rand, Ayn. Philosophy: Who Needs It. Signet: New York, 1984.
Salzmann, Todd. Deontology and Teleology: An Investigation of the Normative Debate in Roman Catholic Moral Theology. University Press, 1995.
Shaw, William. Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc., 1999.