“Mandatory Firm Rotation and Partner Signing” by Bergner Essay (Article Review)

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda

The article titled “Mandatory Firm Rotation and Partner Signing” explores the two new standards of quality accounting that were released by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). These standards are partner signature requirements and mandatory firm rotation. The mandatory rotation requirement promotes auditors’ independence. On the other hand, mandatory partner signing aims at eliminating social biases that the auditor may develop unconsciously towards his/her clients as a result of working closely with them. These close ties, economic or social, between the auditor and the client make the auditor lose objectivity not noticing it.

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Article Review on “Mandatory Firm Rotation and Partner Signing” by Bergner
808 writers online

Accounting professionals raised more concerns over the mandatory rotation requirement than the lead engagement partner requirement. The main argument behind opposing the mandatory firm rotation requirement was that it would make audit firms incur more costs and affect the quality of auditing negatively once implemented. It was also observed that the mandatory rotation requirement was likely to disrupt auditing firms in their duties. The article presents an argument that new auditors took a lot of time learning a client upon implementing this requirement. This had the likelihood of decreasing the quality of the audit. This issue has been proven through research showing that the initial years of an audit are mainly characterized by audit failure, thus, the mandatory firm rotation requirement would only complicate the situation instead of preventing it.

Those who supported the mandatory firm rotation requirement stated that it would neutralize the possibility of auditors’ independence being compromised by the convenient relationship that develops between a client and an auditor over time. The requirement was aimed at improving skepticism and objectivity among auditors. The premise behind this argument was that continued interaction between a client and an auditor leads to a situation where the client influences the auditor. This raises the risk of compromising the auditor’s independence and skepticism unconsciously.

In the article, it is also discussed that an auditor is more likely to succumb to a client’s demands since losing the client can lead to psychological loss. It is, however, notable that there is no research backing the argument that mandatory firm rotation has the potential of breaking ties developed between the client and the auditor.

Having the lead engagement, the partner puts his/her name and signature before an audit report is disclosed to the public and eliminates unconscious bias by promoting identifiability. In essence, this guarantees transparency and accountability among auditors. The end result of these actions is that firms are challenged to improve the quality of audits. It should be noted that identifiability is a form of accountability, thus the signature requirement enhances accountability and independence among auditors. It can be concluded based on the research that has shown that people are more likely to perform acceptable actions if they are identified by outsiders to avoid public backlash.

Bergner (38) concludes that both proponents and opponents of the mandatory firm rotation requirement have valid points, but there is a need to reconcile and have a uniform solution. While proponents look at the social side of the argument, they ignore the cost and quality concerns that are raised by the opponents. This situation complicates the efforts of finding a lasting and favorable solution for both sides. Although the author points to the possibility of reconciling the two sides, he does not guarantee that this would lead to an ultimate solution.

Works Cited

Bergner, Jason. “Mandatory Firm Rotation and Partner Signing.” The CPA Journal 83.8 (2013): 36-38. Print.

1 hour!
The minimum time our certified writers need to deliver a 100% original paper
Print
Need an custom research paper on “Mandatory Firm Rotation and Partner Signing” by Bergner written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, June 7). “Mandatory Firm Rotation and Partner Signing” by Bergner. https://ivypanda.com/essays/mandatory-firm-rotation-and-partner-signing-article-by-bergner/

Work Cited

"“Mandatory Firm Rotation and Partner Signing” by Bergner." IvyPanda, 7 June 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/mandatory-firm-rotation-and-partner-signing-article-by-bergner/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) '“Mandatory Firm Rotation and Partner Signing” by Bergner'. 7 June.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "“Mandatory Firm Rotation and Partner Signing” by Bergner." June 7, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/mandatory-firm-rotation-and-partner-signing-article-by-bergner/.

1. IvyPanda. "“Mandatory Firm Rotation and Partner Signing” by Bergner." June 7, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/mandatory-firm-rotation-and-partner-signing-article-by-bergner/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "“Mandatory Firm Rotation and Partner Signing” by Bergner." June 7, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/mandatory-firm-rotation-and-partner-signing-article-by-bergner/.

Powered by CiteTotal, bibliography generator
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1