Introduction
Motivation refers to the urge to work to reach a particular level or attain a certain target, which results in goal-directed conduct. When an individual is inspired, it means they are making a lot of effort to complete a project. For an individual to work effectively, enthusiasm is undoubtedly necessary, yet it is insufficient in most people. Inspiration helps personnel achieve individual and corporate objectives and, to some point, the aspirations of individual countries. Motivation also plays a critical part in all privately held or state-owned businesses. The motivational theory includes Maslow’s hierarchy hypothesis, Hertzberg’s inspiration principle, and many more (Li et al., 2019). The most effective inspiring theory is one that alters people’s behaviors. Maslow’s concept of the hierarchical order mainly points out what people want. Maslow categorized all individual desires into a hierarchy, from the lowest to highest order, primarily based on professional training.
The Situations in which a Leader Used a Motivation Theory
Leaders can use theories such as Hertzberg’s principle of motivation to inspire interns during industrial training. In case an intern exceeds company goals at the end of a progress report, the management always acknowledges the intern’s accomplishments inside the company. The process motivated the interns to put in a lot of effort and reach even beyond the company’s objectives. Interns always performed their tasks tirelessly to keep advancing within the company when the managers noticed their performance since they were interested in moving forward. According to Hertzberg’s hypothesis of inspiration, a performance review was appropriate because interns could accept working for the company because the supervisor appreciated their efforts (Li et al., 2019). The intern’s motivation resulted from positive attention, which made the intended conduct more likely to occur in the time ahead by giving encouraging or stimulating stimuli to the interns after the company delayed the behavior.
The Situations where Motivational Tools Failed
The use of financial rewards as incentive plans was one of the cases which failed to work. The management decided to put financial rewards since they cover everything from the job setting to the many perks of a job. When there is a positive work atmosphere, people are likelier to go above and beyond to achieve organizational targets, even if there is no direct financial benefit (Li et al., 2019). Personnel is more likely to commit themselves to their task without worrying about compensation because they know the administration’s importance on staff. Additionally, since the government designed insurance policies to guarantee that workers are in healthy condition and that the workers will receive high-quality health services in the event of a disaster, the delivery of advantages like rewards fosters a feeling of belonging among the members of the company.
Finance does not appear to impact how well the company’s personnel perform. As a result, employees remain motivated and ready to contribute to the company. Additionally, money does not satisfy the employee’s relationship with the company; instead, the employee’s demand for economic security (Li et al., 2019). Financial security was the main reason for the individuals to look for work so that they could put bread on the table and construct houses for their families. Individuals’ primary means of living are their fundamental desires; hence it is essential to give job applicants confidence that they can achieve the demands. Nevertheless, incentive extends past satisfying a worker’s fundamental needs in the workplace.
Leaders can link financial ability to motivate people to aversive stimuli, which generally happens when a given incentive is missing from a specific individual’s conduct. Leaders should eliminate any adverse repercussions; otherwise, the chance that the particular conduct will occur once more in the time ahead increases (Li et al., 2019). The same is true of Hertzberg’s environmental health components, which state that elements like protection and colleague relationships have little bearing on a worker’s effectiveness at work. The query might rise whether the employee would love to work in a company where they receive monthly payments and have no influence over decisions.
People and animals act the same and can typically change their conduct through stimulus and response. Achievement depends on various factors, including the compensation and rank that a person will receive for completing a particular task or satisfying the prerequisites for a particular duty given inside a company (Li et al., 2019). When personnel knows they might receive a prize annually for their efforts, their conduct frequently changes. The company will observe staff working tiresomely to guarantee that personnel can get a prize.
Conclusion
Finally, workers might require additional coaching in a certain realm of experience to become flawless in the task and increase their chances of succeeding in reaching organizational objectives. Companies should adopt concepts such as Herzberg’s hypothesis of inspiration and Maslow’s hierarchy hypothesis. Companies should understand that an individual is motivated through accomplishment, exceeding the desired targets, acknowledgment, and the overall workplace environment. Staff will only strive harder in matters that advance them up the organizational pyramid.
Reference
Li, D., Xu, X., Chen, C. F., & Menassa, C. (2019). Understanding energy-saving behaviors in the American workplace: A unified theory of motivation, opportunity, and ability. Energy Research & Social Science, 51, 198-209.