The modern business environment has been pervasively influenced by radical decision-making processes that seek to expand the operations of firms beyond the narrow regional scope. Although the Born Globals are purported to have superior financial access, the same might not guarantee their success in the dynamic global market. The essay offers a critical comment of the given article by suggesting latest information, methods of analysis, or theoretical approaches that might contribute to the writer’s reasoning.
Although we may argue that access to a huge pool of financial resources is an added advantage to firms that operate at the global level (Born Globals), the authors should have also discussed the importance of sound financial management in the success of global firms. The article should indeed argue along with other positive management attributes that lead to the success of global firms. Internationalization and globalization are two distinct levels of business operations that have not been distinguished in the article for the benefit of the target audience.
Although the authors argue in favor of the Born Globals, management-related skills can be accessed by SMEs that are run at the international level. The Born Internationals can realize similar benefits even though the authors are arguing in support of Born Globals.
Venture capital and external business partners should not be the only factors that strengthen the operations of Born Globals. In any case, the failure rates of these organizations are sometimes quite high. The article does not present the reasons why Born Globals are bound to fail than Born Internationals. Through Research and Development, Born Internationals can experience exponential growth rates when social and economic growth factors are favorable.
Reference
Martelli, Joseph T., and Patricia B. Abels. “Multinational Corporations: The Changing Landscape.” Management Research Review, vol. 34, no. 8, 2011, pp. 889–909. Crossref. Web.