Negative Aspects Affecting Accident
The NTSB accident report provides details about the crash that occurred on February 14, 2014, and involved Cessna 210L, N732EJ (National Transportation Safety Board, 2014). The crash resulted in the plane’s destruction and the death of the pilot and his wife. Having overestimated his skills and abilities, the pilot made several crucial mistakes, whereas the operator did not carry out the dispatch procedures properly, which caused the plane to crash.
In retrospect, the plane crash could be seen as the effect of several factors combined. For instance, the fact that the pilot overestimated his ability to control the plane in an environment that could be defined as rather challenging needs to be addressed. There is evidence from the company that requested the flight that the pilot had not contacted them despite their previous agreement (National Transportation Safety Board, 2014).
Therefore, the carelessness of the pilot must be viewed as one of the factors that led to the tragedy. In addition, the mistakes made by the operator, who guided the landing, have to be seen as the primary factors that determined the tragic outcome (National Transportation Safety Board, 2014). For instance, the fact that the controller failed to coordinate the available data with the nearby facility and, thus, made the pilot make several crucial mistakes needs to be mentioned.
Future Repercussions from a Similar Issue
Future cases involving the same events like the ones described in the report are likely to entail a wide range of repercussions. The specified repercussions would imply legal responsibilities for both the pilot and the controller, as well as the rest of the staff that will ostensibly be involved in the accident. For instance, in the case of survival, a pilot would have to face repercussions for the professional misjudgment and errors made when performing their duties.
Indeed, in case of violating the company’s orders and taking an extra member on his business trip to the designated area, the pilot might be sued for money that will be lost as a result of their careless actions. The lack of consideration for the weather conditions and the choice of flight strategies would also be deemed as inexcusable and requiring serious measures upon a detailed investigation. Therefore, the pilot would have to face severe legal consequences if a similar scenario is repeated, yet the pilot would not be injured or harmed in the process.
An operator that will need to guide a pilot and provide detailed information about the factors that will define the strategy for landing will also have to face the serious consequence and deal with legal responsibility for a negative outcome. The success of landing hinges on the instructions that an operator gives a pilot. Therefore, making mistakes in the process may result in the following crash, which means that the operator should also be held responsible for the outcome in case the instructions were misguiding.
The investigation of similar issues is likely to be considerably convoluted because of the lack of evidence and the presence of factors that may hinder the analysis, e.g., weather conditions that may make it difficult to understand what has happened. Therefore, the use of legal repercussions should also be viewed as a possibility once every single factor is identified and the role that every agent played in the event is identified successfully.
Reference
National Transportation Safety Board. (2014). NTSB identification: ERA14FA120. Web.