Introduction
Nature history, which began mid eighteenth century, soon became part of life sciences. The discipline gave rise to critical life-evolution theory organization and continued as a dynamic science with remarkable applied value. Nature history establishes the relationship between research areas by enlightening associated life sciences. The essay compares order of nature based on Farber, Linnaeus, and Buffon, gives historical context, and provides Linnaeus and Buffon’s institutional settings and backgrounds.
Main Body
Farber’s “order of nature” better positions people to comprehend and engage critical questions concerning the significant changes in how nature’s diversity has been studied and represented. Linnaeus established the order of nature by developing a catalog of life’s natural history. Therefore, he observed and maintained a deep yet religious significance relative to naming and classifying animals and plants. Buffon uncovered nature’s broadly outlined order comprising of more than a list of specific classes; instead, it portrayed an outstanding representation where people identified historical change, driving forces, genuine relationships, and geographical distributions.
Farber’s historical work context is established on his interest in science, which he acquired from his scientist father. He chose to focus on Histoire Naturelle by Buffon while at Indiana University. Farber’s first book, “The Emergence of Ornithology as a Scientific Discipline,” was published in 1982. Carl Linnaeus was born in Sweden to a clergyman but traveled to obtain a medical degree at Harderwijk University. Linnaeus chose to use Greek words andria and gynia, to reflect different marriage types in the plants. Buffon was appointment to the Royal Garden and did a monumental work of the natural history of every living being and mineral. He published books, which entailed compiling humans, birds, quadrupeds, and minerals’ natural history. His administrative prowess that became the source of his lasting reputation. Linnaeus lived most of his career in a small university town in the Netherlands and gained his natural history knowledge from medical education, including medical botany, physiology, and anatomy. Buffon lived in Paris, was scientifically informed and politically astute, and was appointed Royal Garden director. Buffon’s interest is generally in science, especially in forest cultivation and wood strength.
Conclusion
Towards understanding order of nature, the essay gives Farber’s. Linnaeus’s, and Buffon’s account of how they perceived history of nature. In so doing, the historical context of the scientists is provided. In contrast, Linnaeus associates his work by developing natural history’s life catalog while Buffon outlines his notion of history nature by broadly outlining flora and fauna using scientific perspective. Farber uses dominant scientific approaches of his age to make clear that his goal to identify and collect every flora and fauna on earth was closely attributed to European nations’ colonial ambitions.
Bibliography
Buffon, George Louis Leclerc. Buffon’s Natural history. Containing a theory of the earth, a general history of man, of the brute creation, and vegetables, mineral &c. &c. &c. London, 1897.
Farber, Paul Lawrence. Finding Order in Nature: The Naturalist Tradition from Linnaeus to E.O. Wilson. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.
Rose, Hugh. The Elements of Botany: containing the history of the science etc. etc.: Being a Translation of the Philosophia Botanica and other Treatises of the celebrated Linnaeus: An appendix is added wherein some plants lately found in Norfolk and Suffolk. London, 1775.