Neutralization of Bundy, Manson and Arbery Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Ted Bundy

The first impression that Ted Bundy creates is that of a well-educated and conscious person. The criminal seems very observant and manipulative, which instills a sense of trust in his words. He provides decent claims and explanations without dodging an interviewer. In the first video, Bundy seems emotionally active, as though he is willing to justify himself. In contrast, he looks more tranquil in the second video, as if he has accepted the idea of being sentenced to death. His body language in the former interview, specifically smiles and open posture, demonstrates that he is ready for a discussion. Meanwhile, in the latter, Bundy can his arms clenched and keeps looking down.

Throughout the interviews, Bundy implements the denial of responsibility, the neutralization technique aimed at placing accountability for the committed action on other people or circumstances. For instance, in the first video, the killer states: “let’s just wait and let it [evidence] come out in court” (Captain Borax, 2021, 17:16). In the second video, he claims: “I am not blaming pornography and not saying that it caused me to do certain things” (Alphanite, 2021, 5:16). It is called justification, meaning that Bundy attempts to provide the premises of his acts even though they would be discredited. His statement implies that he does not desire to accept his guilt unless it is proved by the judges.

Whereas the first interviewer does not mention any victims but concentrates on his prison life and motives, the second asks to allude to his remorse towards the victims. Bundy says he is taken back to those moments and feels terrible about the murders. When the interviewer inquires Ted if he genuinely feels innocent, he nods and rubs his chin. This shows slight insecurity, as though he attempts to process this idea through his mind without fully accepting the committed crimes. As a result, it implies that he barely demonstrates any remorse, yet there is a deep understanding of the inevitable sentence.

Charles Manson

Originally, it seemed like Charles Manson acted in an arrogant manner, neglecting the interviewer. Moreover, the criminal looks to be self-conceited; his posture, which is half-sitting on a stool, says that he did not come to confess his fault. Being the most notorious killer of the twentieth century, Manson looks quite pathetic because of his appearance. Since it is a jail interview, he makes decisive statements and raises the tone of his voice whenever he wants to argue. The cult’s head mocks and openly quarrels with the interviewer.

In the video, he says: “I knew I wasn’t gonna go to the gas chamber because I hadn’t done anything wrong” (60 Minutes Australia, 2019, 1:00). This is the appeal to defeasibility that he uses to justify his deeds. The criminal also resorts to sad tales to prove that what he did was just a matter of circumstances. It is emphasized in his utterance about his past: “I’ve been to every reform school across the country” (60 Minutes Australia, 2019, 2:14). There is no recognition of disclaimers as Manson is straightforward in his speech. When speaking about Sharon Tate, one of his sect’s victims, he stammers and repeats the same words. On the whole, there is absolutely no remorse in his words and actions. It appears that Manson was totally obsessed with his cult, which made him believe in global superiority over humankind.

Ahmaud Arbery

The video is increasingly shocking and disturbing as it depicts the crime scene with both the victim and one of the criminals involved. However, it felt like Greg McMichael told a story of accidentally shooting a bird, not a person. Initially, I thought this man was passing by the crime scene and describing what he had just observed. McMichael’s voice sounds steady, and no remorse is heard in his narrative as if he is in a shock phase. For a moment, I believed that by speaking facts, he wanted to get away from the charges.

Nonetheless, he uses numerous manipulative neutralization techniques, which makes him sound convincing. For example, he says that the victim has reportedly provoked his son Travis and he ran out of the truck with a gun. Meanwhile, the father shouted: “Travis, don’t do anything!” (First Coast News, 2020, 6:23). This phrase seems like a denial of responsibility, and the prior circumstances reflect the condemnation of a condemner (as if the victim has aggravated the murderers). His utterance, “I pulled his hand out and then realized he didn’t have anything in his hand,” is a cognitive disclaimer (First Coast News, 2020, 6:52). The man clarifies that he has seen a gun in the victim’s arm, but there was nothing. No appeal to higher loyalties is identified, even though McMichael alludes to his investigating experience. When the victim is mentioned, the man acts confidently, describing every detail of the deed. In general, I did not notice any repentance in his voice as if his narrative sounded as if he was retelling a normal event. In fact, it appeared that the man had merely participated in the murder for racial reasons.

References

Alphanite. (2021). [Video]. YouTube.

Captain Borax. (2021). [Video]. YouTube.

First Coast News. (2020). [Video]. YouTube.

60 Minutes Australia. (2019). .

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2023, May 21). Neutralization of Bundy, Manson and Arbery. https://ivypanda.com/essays/neutralization-of-bundy-manson-and-arbery/

Work Cited

"Neutralization of Bundy, Manson and Arbery." IvyPanda, 21 May 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/neutralization-of-bundy-manson-and-arbery/.

References

IvyPanda. (2023) 'Neutralization of Bundy, Manson and Arbery'. 21 May.

References

IvyPanda. 2023. "Neutralization of Bundy, Manson and Arbery." May 21, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/neutralization-of-bundy-manson-and-arbery/.

1. IvyPanda. "Neutralization of Bundy, Manson and Arbery." May 21, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/neutralization-of-bundy-manson-and-arbery/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Neutralization of Bundy, Manson and Arbery." May 21, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/neutralization-of-bundy-manson-and-arbery/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1