Sandra Fernandes and Shobha Naidu’s journal illustrates the authors’ understanding of a significant topic in the nursing profession. “Promoting Participation in self-care management among patients with diabetes mellitus” article exposes readers to Peplau’s theory to understand the concept of interpersonal relationships. Fernandes and Naidu are qualified scholars who have the knowledge, experience, and skill to address healthcare matters. Fernandes is an Associate Professor of nursing with a master’s degree in the same profession. Similarly, Naidu is a health expert at the College of Nursing Pune in India. As such, the two authors meet the qualifications or requirements to author nursing-related reports and studies. Article 1 evaluates the effectiveness of Peplau’s theory in promoting the promotion of individual care for type II diabetes patients (Fernandes & Naidu, 2017). According to the study, diabetes mellitus is common among elderly persons and rare among youth.
In contrast, Michael Hall and Edward Tolhurst demonstrate their prowess in analyzing “nurses’ perspectives in supporting patients with diabetes mellitus.” In their article, Hall & Tolhurst (2020) incorporates the primary care setting to monitor people living with type II diabetes. According to the article, access to external support, communication, and extra attention to affected populations help nurses promote self-management among people diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Reviewing both articles provides readers with the insights to highlight the main points, arguments, findings, strengths, and weaknesses of the nursing journal and article.
The statement problem is clearly stated in Fernandes & Naidu’s (2017) journal. At the beginning of the study, the authors familiarize their readers with the growing dangers of diabetes mellitus. According to the writers of article 1, type 2 diabetes was becoming a common public health threat. The experiment’s purpose is clear based on its title. Unlike in Fernandes and Naidu’s journal, it is not easy to locate the statement problem in Hall & Tolhurst’s (2020) article. The text-only provides an overview of care for individuals battling diabetes. Article 2 highlights the role of nurses in supporting people living with diabetes mellitus but unclearly identifies the statement problem. However, both articles are significant to nursing because they create awareness of managing diabetes mellitus.
Fernandes & Naidu (2017) is a recent journal published in the past five years. The journal is a recent study that incorporated primary and secondary sources. Nonetheless, the references incorporated in the work were only listed but not cited in the research. Inversely, Hall & Tolhurst (2020) is the most recent article that effectively cited and referenced primary sources throughout the work. Arguments in the article are properly stated and supported by the sources; as such, Hall & Tolhurst’s article was more articulate and convincing. A solid basis for the study is provided in both the journal and article based on the clear methods included in the experiments.
Even though Fernandes & Naidu’s work constituted primary and secondary research, the journal did not adequately define key concepts well as it appears in Hall & Tolhurst (2020). Hall & Tolhurst’s article defines the exclusion and inclusion criteria, demographic variables, and nursing assessments are defined in Hall & Tolhurst’s article. Theoretical frameworks formulate the basis of conceptual analysis; the component is missing in the international nursing journal, making it difficult to interpret the results.
Hall and Tolhurst provided the background, study objectives, and methodology and skipped the hypotheses segment. Qualitative research depends on independent and dependent variables to measure the changes in any experiment. It would be complicated to relate the nursing perspectives to self-management strategies within a primary setting without a clear thesis statement. The reverse is true in Fernandes & Naidu’s (2017) journal because the work uses interpersonal relationships to design a model of offering self-responsibility and care for patients with type 2 diabetes. In addition, the absence of an explicitly stated hypothesis and research question in Hall and Tolhurst’s article has been justified using study themes below the research methods.
The research methods and procedures incorporated in both texts indicate the coherent skills and knowledgeability of the authors on nursing concepts. For example, Hall and Co-researcher used a primary setting to undertake the experiment. Engaging individuals from the West Midlands region shows the surety of the scholars in awareness creation. Although the article implemented a methodology sector in it, the paper failed to use qualitative and quantitative data collection methods to support nurses’ perception of self-management and care of type II diabetes patients. The research design, population, sample, and data collection measures were associated in both papers, but Fernandes and Naidu (2017) inappropriately described the population and sample of the test. The international journal of nursing focused only on the demographic variables and failed to state the independent sample quality in the experiment. The generalization of self-care support in the journal shows the paper’s weakness in defending its thesis.
Hall and Tolhurst (2020) grouped its data in a single table, while Fernandes and Naidu (2017) incorporated numerous data sets to compare the viability of their hypothesis. The justification of the measurements in the first research article shows the importance of Peplau’s theory in promoting interactive relationships among patients. On the other end, the data collected in the second nursing journal shows the possibility of biases in the experiment. A single data set of participant characteristics shows no relationships between a primary setting and the states of type II diabetes populations. Data analysis and research findings supported the article and journal titles. Nevertheless, the sufficient information listed under the findings in Hall and the co-author’s work simplified the meta-analysis of the nursing evidence practice more than Fernandes and the partner. The article’s implications bring smiles to readers; the critique recommends students read the text and use the knowledge to boost their understanding of patient care. The research was reasonable and complete based on the findings and connections to its initial objectives of promoting self-awareness of diabetes and how to survive the public health threat.
Observing the structure of the qualitative research, it is evident that Hall and Tolhurst incorporated an in-depth phenomenon of interest. Comparing the procedures and results to the quantitative research, the critique chooses the second article over the journal. The article demonstrates its themes fluently and systematically, exposing readers to better positions of interpreting the significance of self-care management in a primary setting characterized by type 2 diabetes diagnoses. The study purpose in the article matches that of the research design, while the results in the nursing journal mismatched the quantitative variables to the original aim of the experiment.
The data analysis approach in the journal was not appropriate in the journal. Meaning Hall and the study partner organized the text in a standard research design. Recommending the article starts with formatting and citing information from primary and secondary sources. The reports in both the nursing journal and article adequately described how the actual analysis of the study process escalated. In article one, the evidence provided that elderly people are more vulnerable to type 2 diabetes. While article 2 concluded that the self-analysis of type 2 diabetes is complicated due to the disparities in people’s experience upon diagnosis with the disease.
References
Fernandes, S., & Naidu, S. (2017). Promoting Participation in Self Care Management among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: An Application of Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relationships. International Journal of Nursing Education, 9(4), 129-134. Web.
Hall, M., & Tolhurst, E. (2020). Nurse Perspectives on Supporting Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes within a Primary Care Setting. Journal of Diabetes Nursing, 24(5). ISSN 2517-7753