Home > Free Essays > Law > Common Law > Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation

Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation Essay

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda
Updated: May 7th, 2022

In the following paper, the United States Supreme Court case No. 11-1175 Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation will be addressed in terms of its major details with a purpose of gaining further experience with case analyses. The studying of this case helps acquiring additional understanding on how the use of different types of legislative reporters can assist researchers. Generally, the evaluation of facts shows that researches may benefit from such studies by means of actualizing their knowledge regarding the specific points of legal analysis such as studying the parties of the case, finding the primary issues in the case, and understanding the importance of the court decisions for the future of the legal system of the country.

The United States Supreme Court case No. 11-1175 was docketed on March 28, 2012. The parties in the case were Olivea Marx, the Petitioner, and General Revenue Corporation, the respondent. The case was argued in front of the United States Supreme Court on November 7, 2012 (Supreme Court of the United States par. 1, 2).

The case was decided by the United Supreme Court on November 7, 2012. The case No. 11-1175 was appealed from the United Sates Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (Supreme Court of the United States par. 4).

The primary issue of the case was whether the defendant in an FDCPA case is obliged to be awarded costs where the court proceedings were not “brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment” (“Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation” 2). The petitioner aimed to defend her right to reject paying the dept that the defendant was trying to enforce.

Critically reflecting on the importance of the case under consideration, it should be stated that it makes quite a precedent in 54 (d)(1) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure. The essence of this rule is in allowing the costs other than attorney’s fees to the prevailing party unless a court order or a federal statute provides otherwise (“Supreme Court News” par. 12). Thus, the significance of the case No. 11-1175 is of great importance for the operation of the country’s law system, and especially for its economic background. The reason why the significance of this case is so considerable is in the fact that both of the parties of the lawsuit, the petitioner and the respondent, have their financial expenses of not-insubstantial size, and, of course, it is essential for both of them to have a purposeful usage of their financial means.

As a final point, it should be mentioned that the evaluation of different court cases such as the United States Supreme Court case No. 11-1175 suggests a conclusion that researchers may significantly benefit from the studies of different reporters because they will have a variety of opportunities to actualize and deepen their knowledge regarding the specific points of legal analysis such as studying the parties of the case, finding the primary issues in the case, and understanding the importance of the court decisions for the future of the legal system of the country. In particular, examining of the case Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation identified that some cases appear to be important even for the financial matters that are connected with the legal system of the country and the lawsuits that take place within it.

References

Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation. 2012. Web.

Supreme Court News: Recent and Upcoming Cases. 2012. Web.

Supreme Court of the United States. Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation. 2012. Web.

This essay on Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation was written and submitted by your fellow student. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly.
Removal Request
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda.
Request the removal

Need a custom Essay sample written from scratch by
professional specifically for you?

Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar
Writer online avatar

certified writers online

Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, May 7). Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation. https://ivypanda.com/essays/olivea-marx-v-general-revenue-corporation/

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, May 7). Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation. Retrieved from https://ivypanda.com/essays/olivea-marx-v-general-revenue-corporation/

Work Cited

"Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation." IvyPanda, 7 May 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/olivea-marx-v-general-revenue-corporation/.

1. IvyPanda. "Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation." May 7, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/olivea-marx-v-general-revenue-corporation/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation." May 7, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/olivea-marx-v-general-revenue-corporation/.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation." May 7, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/olivea-marx-v-general-revenue-corporation/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation'. 7 May.

Powered by CiteTotal, essay bibliography maker
More related papers