Peer-Mentorship and Self-Management of Pain Research Paper

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Sample and Setting

Number of Subjects

To carry out a detailed analysis of the effects that peer-mentoring and self-management have on patients suffering from pain, one will have to recruit a total of at least 200 participants. Thus, the foundation for an all-embracive analysis can be created. With the above information in mind, one will have to consider using a sample size of 120 people. Thus, a basis for retrieving credible results can be built (Creswell, 2014).

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

The participants will be recruited among the people that suffer from pain and need strategies that will help reduce it. Since the perception of pain is individual and, therefore, measuring pain intensity is going to be problematic, it will be necessary to recruit the people that have the same condition (e.g., cancer). Thus, the results of the study will remain homogenous.

Sampling Strategy

To make sure that the outcomes of the study should remain objective, it will be necessary to provide every participant with an equal choice to be selected as a part of the sample group. Therefore, the use of random sampling is recommended. The identified framework will help reduce biases (Grove, Gray, & Burns, 2014).

Research Design

Description

The research will be conducted as a quasi-experimental randomized control trial. The participants will be represented by two main groups, i.e., Group A, where peer mentoring and self-management will be used, and the control group, where traditional approaches to pain alleviation are utilized. A comparison between the two will shed light on the subject matter.

Rationale

It is crucial to make sure that the research is modeled after a real-life scenario. Thus, the efficacy of the study will remain high. Furthermore, the introduction of randomness into the study will help make the outcomes more objective (McKean, Ross, & Dressler, 2016).

References

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Grove, C. K., Gray, J. R., & Burns, N. (2014). Understanding nursing research. Building an evidence-based practice. New York, NY: Elsevier Health Sciences.

McKean, S., Ross, J., & Dressler, D. D. (2016). Principles and practice of hospital medicine. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Professional.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, April 10). Peer-Mentorship and Self-Management of Pain. https://ivypanda.com/essays/peer-mentorship-and-self-management-of-pain/

Work Cited

"Peer-Mentorship and Self-Management of Pain." IvyPanda, 10 Apr. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/peer-mentorship-and-self-management-of-pain/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Peer-Mentorship and Self-Management of Pain'. 10 April.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Peer-Mentorship and Self-Management of Pain." April 10, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/peer-mentorship-and-self-management-of-pain/.

1. IvyPanda. "Peer-Mentorship and Self-Management of Pain." April 10, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/peer-mentorship-and-self-management-of-pain/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Peer-Mentorship and Self-Management of Pain." April 10, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/peer-mentorship-and-self-management-of-pain/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1