In 1817, Percy Bissche Shelley and Horace Smith have entered a friendly sonnet-writing competition. Writers featured in their poems the half-destroyed remnants of the statue, which was erected to Egyptian Pharaoh Ramses II. Ozymandias was another name for this Egyptian monarch, it was given to him by Greek travelers.
The central theme of the poem is human vanity. Both writers tried to express the idea that decline is inevitable. No matter whom you are. Even mighty kings pass into nothingness. Kings, knights, pharaohs, and their deeds, with the flow of time, slip into obscurity. They just become a history. John Berger in his work âWays of seeingâ pointed out: âThe past is not for living in; it is well of conclusions from which we draw in order to act. Cultural mystification of the past entails a double loss. Works of art are made unnecessarily remote. And the past offers us fewer conclusions to complete in actionâ. Both works have the same subject, they are stylistically rich and contain a number of verbal images. Though, there are also differences that should be mentioned.
The work âOzimandiasâ by Percy Bissche Shelly is the mindbender for the readership. The author uses three characters in his work: narrator, traveler, and Ozymandias. The poem is an Italian sonnet with unusual rhyming scheme, it is written in iambic pentameter. The poem contains various poetic devices.
At the beginning of the poem, Shelley depicts the outer manifestation of the remnants. It helps the reader to form an image of the destroyed statue in his mind. Poet uses metaphor, epithets, and inversion here: âTwo vast and trunkless legs of stone stand in the desert⊠Near them, on the sand, half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown, and wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold commandâ. In the metaphor âtrunkless legs of stone stand in the desertâŠâ the author uses the tenor âlags of stoneâ, the vehicle âhuman beingâ, and the ground for comparison is âshared ability to perform actionsâ. Of great interest is the statement: âMy name is Ozymandias, king of kings: Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!â, it is an irony. The usage of this stylistic device, shows poetâs decision to tell target the audience that even the most powerful people become a history, their unfathomed might fades, and people forget about their existence. The phrase âNothing beside remainsâ is sarcasm. It contains negative connotations. There is a feeling that author laughs at the past might of the pharaoh. In this sonnet, Shelley uses symbolic images to express his ideas. The destroyed statue of pharaoh has a double sense. On the one hand, it symbolizes greatness, which vanishes as time goes by. On the other, it shows that the art is eternal.
Horace Smith uses the trochaic foot in his poem. There are two characters in his poem: the narrator, and the desert. There is the phrase, which confirms that desert is the second character: âThe only shadow that the desert knowsâŠâ. Author compares the tenor âdesertâ with the vehicle âhuman beingâ. This poem contains a lot of poetic devices. Smith did not include the depiction of the ruins, he just wrote about gigantic leg. The epithet âGigantic legâ is not as much impressive, as Shelleyâs metaphor âTwo vast and trunkless legs of stone stand in the desertâŠâ. The reader imagines just one huge leg, and that is it. The grandeur of the colossal statue is lost in this poem. In his work, Smith mixes several images: image of desert, image of Ozymandias, image of Babylon, image of London. As a result, we got the overflow of unnecessary information. The work âOn a stupendous Legâ lacks cohesion.
In conclusion, it should be stated, these works differently treat the same subject. Unfortunately, even casual reader might notice that the poem written by Smith seems to be weaker, than that, written by Shelley. The poem âOn a stupendous Legâ is beautiful in and of itself, but it is not âOzymandiasâ.
Works Cited
- Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. London, UK: BBC/Penguin, 1972. Print.
- Shelley, Percy Bissche. Ozymandias 2012. Web.
- Smith, Horace. On a stupendous Leg of Granite 2012.