Janet Moore should agree and accept the proposed job position. At the same time, she should demand the printing of the same warning labels on the packaging from snuff as on cigarettes. Karen said that studies are proving that there are negative consequences in the form of oral cancer. Since this business belongs to the tobacco industry, it is necessary to warn young people about the potential negative consequences. A warning about the dangers of its use can be applied on the side of the package and only in the text. At the same time, the text can be stylized to match other inscriptions on the packs, which will make it harder to notice, but this will suit employers. Thus, customers will be warned and responsibility for the health of teenagers will be removed from Janet Moore.
Considerations of virtue might be involved in making this decision as the decision confronting Janet, in this case, requires a choice between having to deceive young people and getting a job. A virtue approach to the moral problem in this case is similar to my approach. I have adopted a virtue approach as Janet will have the opportunity to change the situation. If someone else had filled the vacancy, perhaps they would not have been interested in preserving the health of teenagers, so the approach of virtue is taken into account in this solution. I think that utilitarianism or Kantian moral theory does not provide a better way to deal with the issue of this case. From the position of Kantian moral theory, the decision made will be considered immoral, since the purity of morality does not imply compromises. In utilitarianism, the decision made will be considered correct, since morality is determined by the benefits that a person brings. By taking up the proposed position, Janet has a chance to change the situation, which means that she is doing the right thing from the point of view of utilitarianism.