Philosophy Reading Reflection: “Annihilation” by Steven Luper Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Luper notices that while there might be destinies more regrettable than death, so losing life is yet a horrible destiny. Individuals may favor death to unceasing torment or punishment. However, few would dismiss the proposal to live as long as they need, and Epicurus’ contention is irrelevant. The expression from the content, ” An event can prevent me death from fulfilling my desires not just by frustrating my attempts to fulfill them, but also by removing my desires,” shows demise is an incident (Benatar, 2010, p.203).

This is basically because it impedes individuals’ cravings. On the off chance that people have a longing they need it to be satisfied, demise may forestall its satisfaction. If an individual appreciates living, biting the dust keeps the person in question from proceeding to do as such. Assuming somebody has expectations and goals, the person will be baffled by the demise. Simply, the motivations to live give motivations not to die. For this load of reasons, passing is grave adversity.

There is a representation of The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde where a young fellow sells his spirit for everlasting youth and excellence. When Dorian understands that it is anything but something he can clutch, he needs some investment, and he needs frantically to keep it. Along these lines, mortality does not simply annihilate excellence and youth. It makes them love and fixated, hence, in the long run, they will be obliterated. Luper’s view permits that situations can be terrible for us long after we are dead and without our thinking about them. I agree that given the certainty of death, it is a good idea to “Epicureanize” our cravings so they can be satisfied inside an ordinary human life expectancy and conditionalized toward the finish of life.

References

Benatar, D. (2010). Life, death, & meaning: key philosophical readings on the big questions. Rowman & Littlefield.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, October 28). Philosophy Reading Reflection: "Annihilation" by Steven Luper. https://ivypanda.com/essays/philosophy-reading-reflection-annihilation-by-steven-luper/

Work Cited

"Philosophy Reading Reflection: "Annihilation" by Steven Luper." IvyPanda, 28 Oct. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/philosophy-reading-reflection-annihilation-by-steven-luper/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Philosophy Reading Reflection: "Annihilation" by Steven Luper'. 28 October.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Philosophy Reading Reflection: "Annihilation" by Steven Luper." October 28, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/philosophy-reading-reflection-annihilation-by-steven-luper/.

1. IvyPanda. "Philosophy Reading Reflection: "Annihilation" by Steven Luper." October 28, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/philosophy-reading-reflection-annihilation-by-steven-luper/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Philosophy Reading Reflection: "Annihilation" by Steven Luper." October 28, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/philosophy-reading-reflection-annihilation-by-steven-luper/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1