Introduction
More has been seen in the expansion of risk management methods across a wide range of logistic frameworks in the previous few decades, including the milieu, well-being, nourishment, delinquency, broadcasting, and transportation. Many organizations have adopted ways of relating the risks in the environment. In the case of healthy living, undue attention has been paid to enhance people’s welfare. Therefore, organizations should relate the risks experienced with the environment they are in (Colonna, 2017). This danger, in a given setting, is not limited to industrial operations but instead involves how the partakers react to the perceived threats.
Civic relations, effective communication, and participating risk supervision have all progressed as strategies to deal with society’s divergent interests. Furthermore, community perception may pose a threat in the notion that they might jeopardize the rightfulness and constancy of existing risk management methods (Just & Echaust, 2021). This essay outlines how society and the public perceive the risks associated with public health and the sociological concepts that support the different understanding from health professionals. Moreover, COVID-19 and diabetes are used as reference conditions in this case to help in the exploration of the concern by these groups. These conditions help in understanding what the public and the health professionals know on issues concerning threats.
The recent outbreak has created an extended emergency. The risk of this condition to the society will have to be accepted and have ways in which they will live with the coronavirus. Health-related perceived risks are essential in driving patient participation, and empirical data shows that consumer decisions may be divided into three categories: deliberative, emotional, and instinctive (Panno, 2016). The role of mathematics, past experiences and prominent occurrences of the hazard, and emotion in the formation of purposeful health-related risk judgments will be well known. (Buchanan & Sripada, 2019). Furthermore, studies have looked into the effects of correct – and incorrect – critical assessments on health behaviors and attitudes (Wardman, 2020). Nevertheless, there is a dearth of data on how focuses on how emotional health-related cognitive factors are formed, and no study on how false optimism regarding perceived dangers is conceptualized to use these non-deliberative judgments
Sociological Role in Diseases and Illnesses
For healthcare professionals engaging with patients and family, as well as for primary care organizations to treat diseases and encourage recuperation, comprehending how to lay society sees the causes of illness and sickness is critical (Schneiker, 2018. Bystanders are less inclined to follow expert advice for managing health or preventing illness when they do not reflect specialists’ ideas about major effects on health (for instance, when they do not think that smoke is harmful to the body). Smoking increases the complications related to diabetes, putting people at risk (Schneiker, 2018). The laypeople and the health professionals adopt different lifestyle choices that would be the leading factor in understanding the risks of diabetes.
With an increase in body weight and sedentary the public and health professions have a high chance of acquiring diabetes. The understanding of the risks, in this case, differs since the health professionals are more equipped with the knowledge to counter diabetes as compared to the laypeople (Curran, 2018). Well-being risk perceptions are critical in motivating health actions, and empirical evidence suggests that perceived risk may be classified into three types: cognitive, emotional, and visceral (Curran, 2018). Much is predictable on the involvement of numeracy, prior understandings and salient occurrences of the danger, and sentiments in the construction of premeditated health-related risk judgments (Heilmann, 2019). Furthermore, studies have looked into the effects of correct–and incorrect–deliberative risk assessments on health behaviors and results (Stockdale, 2021). The members of the public and health experts have a similar understanding of risk as sociologists have shown that people’s financial position, ethnic customs, and other cultural factors are some of which play a role in illness and transmission.
Disparities in culture are repeated in our care and well-being treatment based on socioeconomic class, color and religion, and gender. For instance, diabetes is affected by this sociological factors mentioned above (Pitikoe, 2017). The formerly exclusively responsible for one’s health was based on biological and natural conditions (Stockdale, 2021). To improve the public health standards, there should be a prioritization of programs that are used for management (Rolfe et al., 2018). To improve risk supervision values transferrable to any healthcare environment, the fundamental mechanisms to detect and succeed threats or hazards are needed. For diabetes, therefore, patients should be educated on changing the behaviors that would then lead to better health.
From Social Issues to Dangers
Since its inception, the link between people and groups has been essential to sociological theory. Sociology has – and continues to – examine and describe this link in a variety of ways. Even while everyone recognized that there were no such things as “pure personalities” – people who were untouched by civilization and developed their beliefs, feelings, and destinies independently of it – they all concurred that the connection was not peaceful (Feng & Feng, 2017). People are bound by their social beliefs and cultural ties, and they struggle to transcend society and individual constraints (Stevens, 2020). Similarly, sociologists emphasized that human goals and values emerge not only from within but also from without – from norms and values that surround them and that they will gradually acquire (Schrecker, 2021). They do not create their objectives, values, or interests in isolation from those of others but rather in response to them.
When respective increasingly characterized as caregivers of last option for destitute healthcare or handle Medicare or other support organizations, some patient safety employees are worried. According to some who are anxious, these duties take time away from critical community health operations such as epidemiology and management (Lidskog & Sundqvist, 2012). As a result, neither the person nor the master are puppets, and therefore, conceptual frameworks and cultural identity function as both obstacles and enablers of social activity (Lidskog & Sundqvist, 2012). In a functioning democracy, advancement on healthcare issues needs adequate consensus on the goal and substance of human health to establish a foundation for social opinion (Harding, 2021). There is no common understanding among influence policy, healthcare professionals, quality healthcare institutions and employees, and thought leaders on how to translate a broad objective into particular action.
Thus, the above would be well related to the COVID 19 pandemic that has affected the healthcare system. The professions’ have a piece of more advanced knowledge on the coronavirus than the lay society (24th Sociology of Health and Illness Monograph, 2015). Many public health facilities have been under pressure on a capacity they do not meet during the pandemic. The dangers linked to the health system are that gaps will be created if they will not be protected, and therefore the population will be impacted, and the health of the people questioned.
Stressful situations cause individuals to feel concerned, anxious, and incapable of managing themselves and, therefore, unsafe to their well-being and can cause demise. Fear of contamination, misunderstandings, and myths about the coronavirus are all exacerbated by the ‘infodemic’ of incorrect information about the disease. Lengthy performance can be affected by social factors (24th Sociology of Health and Illness Monograph, 2015). Anxiety, uncertainty, a bad self-image, social isolation, as well as a loss of control over someone’s job and personal life all have a detrimental influence on another’s health.
False information about COVID-19 has a significant influence in establishing such views and behaviors across the world. The social difficulties happen slowly, boosting the incidence of severe depression and early mortality. Prolonged bouts of worry and uncertainty, by way of an absence of supporting connections, may be damaging an aspect of human life (Green, 2019). The lesser individuals in the established and created socioeconomic structure, the more common these problems become (Zinn, 2021). These challenges have different effects on the public and health professionals. For example, health care professionals have experienced yelling racial slurs, being branded an “infectious rat,” being beaten after taking public transportation, getting their things destroyed, and having their kids prejudiced even against colleagues.
Risk Misperceptions in the Public Eye, Explained by Sociology
Risk leaders and scholars progressively realize that the general popular view of danger differs from that of professionals. Fears and attitudes about possible hazards as well as the environment amongst the general population are important elements to consider in community health planning and policy implementation (Abiodun & Olu-Abiodun, 2018). Perceived risk can differ based on geography, age, ethnicity, wealth, and training. The landmark paper “Framework to assist versus technical risk,” published in the scientific journal by nuclear physicist Chauncey Starr, highlights the necessity of assessing public acceptance of risk (Cherry & Heininger, 2017). Because of the programs that have transmitted data to the public, they may impact how people perceived risks and resulting in disparities between potential and actual threats that are difficult to go forward with the statistical generator of hazards.
Sociological Theoretical Approaches
The established epistemological split in sociological concepts amid those that claim that society can be understood objectively by finding and studying its structures, and others argue for a more interpretive or particular approach to social phenomena that focuses more on communal actors (Abbas, 2019). However, in modern years, a third viewpoint has emerged, attempting to reconcile the dichotomy between the qualified importance of social thespians and social institutions. Scientists have spent their time giving attempts to understanding the various community and people’s perceptions of the dangers (Mitchell et al., 2017. Therefore, Identification measures and different theoretical approaches to the above issues have to be dealt with.
Health and Disease from a Functionalist Perspective
The conceptual approach focuses on the significance of contemporary societies, sustainability, and collaboration. Communal events have described their purpose in keeping society’s persistence (Mitchell et al., 2017). We acquire societal principles that are then translated into responsibilities through the socialization process. As a result, it appears that human behavior is structured to attain unanimity (Sinclair, 2019). Having COVID-19 effects shows how unstable society is and, therefore, sickness is endorsed as a custom of nonconformity.
From a functionalist standpoint, health becomes a need for the proper running of society. Being sick entails neglecting to fulfill one’s social obligations; illness is thus regarded as “unmotivated deviation” (Giordano, 2021).” The mechanism of the ‘sick duty’ idea, as well as the regulation by the associated ‘social management’ role of doctors in allowing people to take on such a sick condition. People that are infected by the coronavirus or have a condition such as diabetes are regarded as unproductive from a societal perspective (Ward, 2020). The health professionals are, therefore, required to make policies that would incorporate all the people, and this creates the difference between the laypeople’s understanding of risk and the medical professions (Kearney, McGeoch, & Chown, 2019). The latter would function even after infection compared to the public that would be restricted on some responsibilities.
Health and Disease from a Marxist Perspective
Material production, as of the creation of the basic social requirements such as food, housing, and apparel in a sustenance frugality, is the large production of supplies in modern consumerist society. According to the Marxist viewpoint, it is the most central of all human endeavors (Kearney, McGeoch, & Chown, 2019). Whether the manufacturing takes place in a contemporary or existence bargain, it necessitates some level of organization and the use of appropriate instruments. This is referred to as the ‘powers of innovation.’ Marx recognized that all forms of production include social connections (Feng & Feng, 2017). This approach is applicable in medical sociology in developing the social roots of a disease (Reinert, 2016). The functioning of the capitalist economic system is regarded as influencing population health outcomes.
Global capitalism is usually directly threatened by crises such as COVID-19 as well as other predicaments that would not pose a challenge to the supremacy of intrinsic value. Indeed, problems such as gender discrimination, joblessness, and climate variation play critical roles in the development and maintenance of entrepreneurship (Kearney, McGeoch, & Chown, 2019). Instead, socialism is challenged by how it responds to crises such as the coronavirus outbreak. If, in the handling of the situation, things besides valuation are prioritized, society is jeopardized. When it comes to the COVID-19 pandemic, the reaction is all about saving lives.
The worth of life may be conceptualized in many formats; nonetheless, this is complex and difficult to reduce to a standard financial number. First, health is compromised at the production chain scale, either specifically through workplace diseases and accidents, psychological health issues, or indirectly through the larger consequences of wealth creation in modern society (Cieslik, 2017). The manufacturing processes harm the environment, while the use of the consumables has protracted health implications linked to packaged foods, preservatives, and automobile accidents, among other things (Lupton, 2017). Secondly, the degree of dispersion has an impact on health where individuals reside, their access to learning resources, and their style of existence are all influenced by their income distribution (Lupton, 2017). One should not be Marxist to understand that most of the current societal terrible conditions stem from its material foundations and that people at the bottom of the social ladder (lay people) suffer more considerable risks of disease, infirmity, and early death than the health professionals.
Societies as Collection of Subjective Realities
Individuals engage in deliberate, purposeful activity and, via language, attach interpretations to their activities. Sociologists will be less anxious in explaining the behavior than to know how consumers come to perceive the world in the manner they do (Bartková, 2019). To achieve this goal of interpretative knowledge, essentially, descriptive research approaches are used to get as close to the reality of the patients or social groups being studied as possible (Scambler, 2019). In terms of quality of life and ailment, this informative analysis focuses mostly on (symbolic) connotations rather than confining its understanding of health to what may be deemed the confined field of professional care.
Thus the community should focus on what it means to be unwell. For the approach, the symbolic interactions stand out and the constructionism. Social Scientism, the influence of COVID-19 is overpowering, influencing frameworks and varying rapidly human civilization, and human progress is inescapable and irresistible in that procedure (Scambler, 2019). This is not sudden, but a slow process rising, from leaps and bounds, an urgency to severity, and from occasionally to notify additional transformation of the culture, and evolve from expressionism to modernity.
Health and Disease from a Symbolic Interaction Perspective
This viewpoint arose from a preoccupation with communication and how it allows us to acquire self-awareness. Any language is built on the usage of symbols that represent the interpretations we assign to cultural and psychosocial objects (Dylman, Champoux-Larsson & Zakrisson, 2020). There is an interchange of this symbolism in each social situation where social relationships occur; that is, we search for hints in understanding the behavior and intents of others. Because learners interact street, the interpretive process necessitates a discussion between the people involved. According to this approach, cultural relations have been impacted by the emotions of others (Cohen, 2019). So, if we show any deviant or ‘abnormal conduct, it is possible that the terminology used to describe this behavior in a specific region at a certain time would be attributed to others as people (Hier, 2019). This has the ability to significantly alter our sense of self-identity (Chowdhury & Goswami, 2020). In the case of diabetes, many people have had perceptions that are negative on the use of insulin to treat diabetes.
The knowledge some of the patients have had or heard from close friends has led to negative conclusions. Medicine can be regarded as a societal activity in this light, and its entitlements to be an impartial science would be questioned (Chowdhury & Goswami, 2020). Public discontent can arise in the doctor-patient relationship if the doctor applies a preexisting outline (disease categories) too rigorously to the patient’s personal sickness experience (Luis Turabian, 2018). Culture is essential in healthcare because it encompasses unified aspects of human behavior such as languages, interaction, conventions, attitudes, and ideals. In this regard, the public and the health professionals should incorporate some cultural values with an aim to reduce the misconceptions of diseases such as diabetes, heart disorders and enable better treatment.
The Relativity of Social Reality from Social Constructionist Viewpoint on Health and Disease
The notion of authenticity as a community phenomenon reinforces the conception of the cultural construct in disease knowledge. In other words, there is no absolute standard; only our subjective views of it occur (Macchioni & Prandini, 2019). This sociology of sickness perception scrutinizes problems of how some complex called their ailments as well as the lifestyle choices they make to live managing their conditions. Cultural and individual characteristics both have a crucial influence in shaping the disease state (Mullens et al., 2020). Many healthcare organizations now recognize how human perspectives affect the process of heath and sicknesses, for example, how public health has been socially constructed over time and how scientific competence has changed substantially. The public manages the issues related to health with their cultural values to protect the sick and those that are healthy (Mullens et al., 2020). Many of these Health professionals are more advanced in that most of them have knowledge of different health conditions.
Identifying the Subject of Sociology of Health and Disease
In the learning of health and sickness, sociology provides two unique areas of investigation. On the one hand, it aims to “make sense of sickness” by using sociological perspectives on an investigation of chronic infection and the social structure of well-being and illness on the other (Halwani et al., 2016). It contributes significantly to multiple disciplines into topics of relevance to medical specialists, healthcare strategy formulation, and epidemiological investigations at this particular stage. Sociological investigation can help us understand how broader social dynamics impact people’s health and culture circles at a deeper level. (Burch & Magalhães, 2017). Social disparities, professional connections, transformation and personality, information and authority, and consumerism and risk are examples of such dynamic
In a period of 20 years, well-being promotion and health sociological academics have extensively examined the function of associated systems and their connection to skillful scientific understanding (Cohen, 2019). This connection is effected by a variety of rising developments. Consequently, clinical practice has become more democratic as people lose faith in medical as well as scientific competence and have more exposure to other care services (Burch & Magalhães, 2017). Sociologists urge more individual accountability for health managing risk, with social care users are placed as engaged and “informed users” of health strength‐care strategy (Burch & Magalhães, 2017). The development of service handlers as knowledgeable customers puts the conventional relationship to the test.
Conclusion
The current Covid-19 epidemic has wreaked havoc on the demographics’ mental and sociological well-being. Diabetes has also been a leading cause of death in different parts of the world due to its complications. It may be challenging to provide appropriate diabetic treatment in order to obtain the desired results. Acknowledging patients’ viewpoints, beliefs, heritage, societal problems, and linguistic barriers may make it easier to offer appropriate treatment and help both healthcare professionals accomplish their mutual objective of enhanced care heath. The public and health care workers, for example, have developed thread major depression, anxiousness, depressive disorder, as well as specific other primary causes as a result of their exposure, according to research.
People’s choices and perceptions of sensitivity for others were also influenced by social remoteness and protective measures. Sociology has enabled a realization of how different professions understand the risks under public health. In this context, the health professionals have more knowledge than the lay society that uses cultural beliefs in protecting the people. The sociologists monitor the different patterns and behaviors and, thus, this enables institutions and other stakeholders to care for the survival of humanity.
References
24th Sociology of Health and Illness Monograph. (2015). Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(8), 1394-1394. Web.
Abbas, M. (2019). Bariatric surgery in patients with ventricular assist devices: Is it Worth the Risk? Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 22(3). Web.
Abiodun, O., & Olu-Abiodun, O. (2018). The women who fear the unknown: Potential drivers of the cervical cancer epidemic in rural Nigeria. Journal of Global Oncology, 4(Supplement 2), 27s-27s. Web.
Bartková, L. (2019). How do consumers perceive the dual quality of goods and their economic aspects in the European Union? An empirical study. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 382-394. Web.
Buchanan, J., & Sripada, C. (2019). Folk judgments about mood enhancement: well-being trumps set points. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 4(2), 145-154. Web.
Burch, J., & Magalhães, P. (2017). How do decision aids affect the understanding and decisions of people facing health treatment or screening decisions? Cochrane Clinical Answers. Web.
Cherry, J., & Heininger, U. (2017). Measles morbidity and mortality in the developed world are greater than the public perceives.Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 4(suppl_1), S574-S574. Web.
Chowdhury, S., & Goswami, S. (2020). COVID-19 and type 1 diabetes: dealing with the difficult duo. International Journal Of Diabetes In Developing Countries, 40(3), 315-320. Web.
Cieslik, M. (2017). The happiness riddle and the quest for a good life. Houndmills. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cohen, P. (2019). Scholarly Communication in Sociology. Open Sociology.
Colonna, M. (2017). Editorial overview: Sense and react: how the innate immune system detects threats and generates protective responses. Current Opinion in Immunology, 44, v-vii. Web.
Curran, D. (2018). Beck’s creative challenge to class analysis: From the rejection of class to the discovery of risk-class. Journal of Risk Research, 21(1), 29–40. Web.
Feng, M., & Feng, L. (2017). Philosophical analysis on the nature and forms of information—From the perspective of Marxist philosophy. Proceedings, 1(3), 99. Web.
Green, R. (2019). Maintaining masculinity: Moral positioning when accounting for prostate cancer illness. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for The Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine. Web.
Giordano, C. (2021). Freedom or money? The dilemma of migrant live-in elderly carers in times of COVID19.Gender, Work & Organization 28(S1): 137–150. Web.
Halwani, M., Koshak, E., & Maddy, E. (2016). Teaching infection control longitudinally in an integrated medical program: Will that make the difference? Infection, Disease & Health, 21(3), 139-140. Web.
Harding, S. (2021). Dreaming Marx, Engels, Durkheim, and Simmel. Journal of Classical Sociology. Web.
Heilmann, L. (2019). Health and numeracy: the role of numeracy skills in health satisfaction and health-related behavior. ZDM, 52(3), 407-418. Web.
Hier, S.P. (2019). Moral panic and the new neoliberal compromise. Current Sociology, 67: 879–97. Web.
Just, M., & Echaust, K. (2021). An optimal tail selection in risk measurement. Risks, 9(4), 70. Web.
Kearney, M., McGeoch, M., & Chown, S. (2019). Where do functional traits come from? The role of theory and models. Biodiversity Information Science And Standards, 3. Web.
Lidskog R., Sundqvist G. (2012) Sociology of risk. In: Roeser S., Hillerbrand R., Sandin P., Peterson M. (Eds) Handbook of Risk Theory. Springer, Dordrecht. Web.
Luis Turabian, J. (2018). Doctor-patient relationship epidemiology and its implications on public health. Epidemiology International Journal, 2(3). Web.
Lupton, D. (2016). Self-tracking, health and medicine. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 1-5.
Lupton, D. (2017). Towards design sociology. Sociology Compass, 12(1), e12546. Web.
Macchioni, E., & Prandini, R. (2019). Work-life balance measures of working carers and well-being satisfaction within couple relationships: The result of an Italian policy looking through the gender lens. Social Sciences, 8(4), 109. Web.
Mitchell, B., Williams, A., Wong, Z., & O’Connor, J. (2017). Assessing a temporary isolation room from an infection control perspective: A discussion paper. Infection, Disease & Health, 22(3), 129-135. Web.
Mullens, C., Hernandez, J., Anderson, E., & Allen, L. (2020). Just because (most) hospitals are publishing charges does not mean prices are more transparent. JMIR Medical Informatics, 8(2), e14436. Web.
Panno, A. (2016). Trait Emotional Intelligence Is Related to Risk-Taking when Adolescents Make Deliberative Decisions. Games, 7(3), 23. Web.
Pitikoe, S. (2017). Basotho herders learn through culture and social interaction. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 13, 104-112. Web.
Reinert, D. (2016). The future of OSH: A wealth of chances and risks.Industrial Health, 54(5), 387-388. Web.
Rolfe, D., Ramsden, V., Banner, D., & Graham, I. (2018). Using qualitative Health Research methods to improve patient and public involvement and engagement in research. Research Involvement and Engagement, 4(1). Web.
Scambler, G. (2019). A sociology of shame and blame. Cham: Palgrave Pivot
Schneiker, A. (2018). Risk-aware or risk-averse? Challenges in implementing security risk management within humanitarian NGOs. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 9(2), 107-131. Web.
Schrecker, T. (2021). What is critical about critical public health? Focus on health inequalities. Critical Public Health, 1-6. Web.
Sinclair, C. (2019). Societal-level ethical responsibilities regarding active euthanasia: an analysis using the universal declaration of ethical principles for psychologists. Ethics & Behavior, 30(1), 14-27. Web.
Stevens, A. (2020). Governments cannot just ‘follow the science’ on COVID-19. Nature Human Behaviour 4(6): 560. Web.
Ward, P. (2020). A sociology of the Covid-19 pandemic: A commentary and research agenda for sociologists. Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 726-735. Web.
Wardman, J. K. (2020). Recalibrating pandemic risk leadership: Thirteen crisis ready strategies for CVOID-19. Journal of Risk Research 23(7–8): 1092–1120. Web.
Zinn, J. (2021). Introduction: Towards a sociology of pandemics. Current Sociology, 1-18. Web.