The Arizona Department of Corrections is a correctional agency located in my state, Arizona. The facility’s ancillary support structures are all housed in the centralized control where there is zero-tolerance legislation for sexual harassment and abuse. As a result, this outlines a preventative and response approach for all employees and inmates. The limit on cross-gender viewing and searches is another feature of the correctional facility. Except for female officers, the Arizona State Prison Complex (ASPC) is a male-only facility with policies prohibiting cross-gender body searches except in emergencies (Clear et al., 2018). This agency aids the legal system in administering justice by ensuring that criminals receive the punishment they deserve.
Their key duty is to ensure that the offender’s sentence is carried out, which may include prison, jail, or community service. This agency’s four main objectives are deterrence, retribution, incapacitating, and rehabilitation. This agency provides retribution by assigning punishment to those who commit crimes. The Arizona Department of Corrections employs deterrence by instilling fear in criminals. The goal is to create a threat to prevent people from committing crimes in the future. They make sure that anyone entering their facility understands that there will always be a consequence for their actions.
Since the convicted offender is taken off the streets and put in jail or constrained somewhere, the agency is very good at incapacitating them. Through incapacitation of the individual, the agency precludes the person from committing crimes in the future. When offenders are in prison, they cannot commit crimes because they are constantly monitored. Rehabilitation is very important in the agency because it helps people reintegrate into society after being incarcerated by providing programs and job opportunities. The main goal of rehabilitation is for offenders to accept responsibility for the crimes they have committed. In addition, technology plays a crucial role in the agency. The use of technology has the potential to improve staff safety by improving the ability to observe, detect contraband and weapons, monitor inmate movement and location, and provide staff protection. The Arizona Department of Corrections can provide service and help achieve its mission with the help of technology.
The arguments used by proponents of restorative justice to persuade society of the benefits of restorative justice over incarnation and other forms of punishment include the fact that it significantly reduces reoffending for some criminals. It lessens the urge of victims to violent response against their guilty parties. It also aids in reducing the costs of criminal justice when used as a diversion. One of the most compelling arguments is that it lowers the cost of criminal justice. In today’s society, restorative justice attempts to reintegrate offenders into their communities.
Additionally, some restorative justice initiatives are successful in lowering recidivism rates and inspiring individuals to rejoin their society as healthy and productive individuals. This implies that this shift to restorative justice is well-founded in criminologist evidence (Moss et al., 2019). It enables parties to communicate more effectively and develop compassion for the offender while putting their differences aside. They believe that present methods of handling crime focus on the symptoms rather than the causes. They are correct; the present retributive structure can be criticized heavily for simply incarcerating offenders to hold them from society rather than rehabilitating them and suggesting their behavior. They believe that incarcerating someone only breeds hatred in them and accomplishes nothing. Thus, it is better to learn why someone did something wrong than to punish them.
Punishment would have to be a better model for a corrections system. Imprisonment is harsh and immediate retribution for deterring unlawful acts and reforming criminals. When a person receives a penalty, it causes the offenders to reflect on their actions and the gravity of the crime, how it is not acceptable in society, and understand their imprisonment. Punishing criminals gives the community a sense of security and peace of mind about criminal behavior. When offenders become incarnated, it is a way for them to no longer harm the people they have already harmed (Lopez et al., 2018). The prison must be regarded as a place of punishment. However, the retributive concept of shading blood is hollow and pointless as the killing does not bring the dead back; instead, it just forms a chain of hatred that is harmful to both the individuals and society. Even though it is the appropriate retribution for lawbreakers, officials should consider providing rehabilitation programs to better the standards of life of those who have been incarnated.
However, prisons must also become places where offenders are rehabilitated so they may return to society as more productive members. Unless criminal retribution is strictly enforced, individuals will continue to commit crimes out of fear of being punished. Incarnating offenders encourage them to consider their actions and how each action has a consequence, the worst of which is incarceration. Therefore, these purposes, incapacitation, retribution, deterrence, and rehabilitation, play a vital role in society. As a result, punishment is an effective method of lowering crime rates all over the world.
References
Clear, T. R., Reisig, M. D., & Cole, G. F. (2018). American corrections. Cengage learning.
Lopez, A., Moreira, N., Rivera, A., Amdouni, B., Espinoza, B., & Kribs, C. M. (2018). Economics of prison: Modeling the dynamics of recidivism. Arizona State University. Web.
Moss, S. A., Lee, E., Berman, A., & Rung, D. (2019). When do people value rehabilitation and restorative justice over the punishment of offenders?Victims & Offenders, 14(1), 32-51. Web.