Rationale for Landmines Ban Annotated Bibliography

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda®
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

Good, Rachel. “Yes We Should: Why The U.S. Should Change Its Policy Toward The 1997 Mine Ban Treaty.” Journal Of International Human Rights, vol. 9, no. 2, 2011, pp. 209-229.

The article explores the history and core foundations of the Mine Ban Treaty as well as analyzes the reasons for the U.S. government’s withdrawal of the agreement. The author criticizes American authorities for sustaining the policy of exceptionalism.

Therefore, it is important for the power-state to reconsider their humanitarian policy to restore their commitment to protecting human rights and freedom. The source is relevant for the research studies because it produces strategies for accepting further development of landmine ban campaign.

Hansen, Toran. “The Campaign to Ban Landmines.” Peace Review, vol. 16, no. 3, 2004, pp. 365-370.

The article is dedicated to the analysis of constrains and perspectives of the international campaign against landmine. In particular, Hansen points out that state’s policy toward the destruction of stockpiles and landmine clearance can become a step forward to developing a powerful global community.

Considering various cultural and political backgrounds is also essential for the policy reinforcement. Therefore, the source is of great value for the research because it provides enough evidence supporting landmines ban. It also introduces statistics and sufficient detail dedicated to the analysis of non-party states.

Matthew, Richard A., and Kenneth R. Rutherford. “The Evolutionary Dynamics of the Movement to Ban Landmines.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 1, 2003, pp. 29-56.

The analysis of evolutionary progress of the MBT is important to examine because it creates a wider picture of what barriers should be overcome. Focusing on period from 1991-2002, the authors seek to emphasize the benefit of introducing ban policies due to the greater opportunities for innovation and safety mechanisms.

In addition, the scholar insists that expansion of the campaigns across the countries can also contribute to the enhancement of the humanitarian policy. The source, therefore, will help us predict what trends in policy development will be for non-party state.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2019, June 3). Rationale for Landmines Ban. https://ivypanda.com/essays/rationale-for-landmines-ban/

Work Cited

"Rationale for Landmines Ban." IvyPanda, 3 June 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/rationale-for-landmines-ban/.

References

IvyPanda. (2019) 'Rationale for Landmines Ban'. 3 June.

References

IvyPanda. 2019. "Rationale for Landmines Ban." June 3, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/rationale-for-landmines-ban/.

1. IvyPanda. "Rationale for Landmines Ban." June 3, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/rationale-for-landmines-ban/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Rationale for Landmines Ban." June 3, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/rationale-for-landmines-ban/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
1 / 1